What’s The Problem With The National Women’s History Museum?

May 10, 2012 by

The opinions expressed herein are those of the author, and not necessarily those of The New Agenda.

I have always been a big fan of Meryl Streep, and even more so when I found out that she was determined to have the National Women’s Museum be more than a dream, but a reality. And not just in words, but in deeds. Ms. Streep had pledged a cool 1 million dollars to this important project. Having a museum on the Mall in DC that represents the vast contributions by women to this country seems a no-brainer, at least to me. (Photo credit: Gettys.)

Yes, we have Women’s History Month in this country and everything, but that is hardly sufficient to cover all that women have done to help form this nation from the Revolutionary War on. How many people are aware of Deborah Sampson, a young woman who actually fought in the Revolutionary War? Or how about Celia Burliegh, the first woman ordained to the Unitarian ministry in 1871? Or the 19th century humorist, Katherine McDowell? How many of us were taught what the Suffragists really went through, the imprisonment, the beatings, being choked, and more?

Or for a more recent example, Col. Martha McSally, the pioneering fighter pilot about whom fellow TNA contributor, Whitney Zahnd, wrote in terms of her Arizona Representative seat run? I could go on and on, but the bottom line is, much of the education and common discourse about US history glosses over or ignores the history of women.

The point is, we need a Women’s History Museum, and yet the current plan for one is fraught with difficulty, from finances to management (or lack thereof on both counts). Even a heavy hitting donor like Meryl Streep is having a hard time getting any kind of real response from the organization’s higher-ups about what is going on, according to this Huffington Post article.

Not only are there questions about how the funds are managed, but now those politicians who had been spearheading this endeavor have backed off:

[...] On Capitol Hill, where museum executives hoped a new bill would be introduced this spring to help secure a building site on the National Mall, lawmakers who have previously sponsored similar bills were silent.

A spokesman for Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), chief sponsor of the new legislation in the House, offered a series of “no comments” when asked about its status. On the Senate side, numerous email queries to the companion bill’s main sponsor, Republican Susan Collins of Maine, went unanswered.

The unusual quiet from lawmakers, who are trying to stay clear of controversy particularly in an election year, follows HuffPost’s report that NWHM has developed only minimal educational programming or connections within the academic community. Internal documents and public records, along with interviews with NWHM staff, board members and advisers revealed little progress after 16 years toward a $400 million fundraising goal — even as a board member, Ann Stone, sold direct mail services to the museum. In addition, the article cited sources who said board members who questioned the arrangement or sought to recruit independent professionals to challenge Wages and Stone (no relation to story’s reporter) were forced out.

[...]

Maloney has given no timetable to introduce a new bill, even though NWHM previously indicated it would be this spring; NWHM has since backed off the spring deadline. Maloney spokesman Ben Chevat offered, “No comment” to numerous questions by HuffPost about the status of the legislation. A bill introduced a year ago in the House lists 68 co-sponsors. A similar bill in the upper chamber was co-sponsored by 23 senators. (Please click here to read the rest of this article.)

What gives with this? Why is the Museum’s CEO, Joan Wages, being so evasive on what is happening with plans and funds after 16 years? Just what is going on there? HuffPost investigated those very questions:

[...] “There is no official way for anyone in the public to have any say in what decisions are made by ‘the organization known as’ the NWHM,” Denise Baer, a Boston University political scientist and a close observer of the museum, said in an email. “Their decision processes to-date have been closed and insular, and not representative of the full range of views.”

In her four years promoting the museum, Streep said she had never been invited to a board meeting until late March — after Wages got wind of HuffPost’s investigation. “Believe me, I’m going,” said Streep of the scheduled June meeting.

[...]

When she became president of the museum in 2007, Wages seemed like a plausible candidate to head a legislative campaign to secure a dedicated site. “[My] credentials to lead the NWHM are primarily due to my experience as a lobbyist in Washington on behalf of three Flight Attendant unions,” she told HuffPost in an emailed statement.

Stone, too, seemed like an ideal backer: a well-connected Washington insider on the fault line of women’s politics, a pro-choice Republican with good fundraising credentials and a knack for publicity. Stone has been a member of the museum’s board since it was founded and has twice served as treasurer. She has been the senior vice president since 2007.

But a closer look reveals a project rife with apparent conflicts of interest, sloppy record keeping, murky objectives and a stubborn resistance to outside oversight.

As president and CEO, Wages earns a salary of $167,537. Since 2009, she has also served as chair of the board of directors. Wages and Stone both said they leave the room during board meetings when potential conflicts arise. (Please click here to read the rest of this story, along with numerous examples of mismanagement at the NWHM.)

There is something seriously wrong going on with this, from the management in place to the jumping ship by politicians in this election year. I am glad that that Andrea Stone at Huffington Post is investigating why this major project has come to a screeching halt. And it is good that Meryl Strep is not being shy in speaking out about her own frustrations with the delay in moving this forward.

Frankly, though, we deserve better than this. We deserve to have this museum on the Mall in DC. Women’s contributions to this nation have helped shape it in major ways, and that history should be on display for all to see.

At least that’s what I think. How about you?

Filed Under: Opportunity
Tags: