The New Agenda - a voice for all women
Become a Member | Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • Board and Officers
    • Advisory Council
    • Young Women Leadership Council
    • FAQ's
    • We Get Results!
    • Contact Us
  • Media
    • Print & Internet
    • TV & Radio
    • Press Releases
  • Get Involved
    • Take Action!
    • Get Email Alerts
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
  • Features
  • Blog
Home » Uncategorized

Congratulations to Kelly Ayotte and Christine O’Donnell

September 15, 2010

by The New AgendacloseAuthor: The New Agenda Name: The New Agenda
Email: manager@thenewagenda.net
Site:
About: See Authors Posts (81)

|
22 Comments
  • Email
  • Share
  • Tweet

NH's Kelly Ayotte

The New Agenda congratulates Delaware’s Christine O’Donnell and New Hampshire’s KellyAyotte on their primary victories.

We are pleased that the RNSC retraced their missteps last evening and will now back BOTH candidates.

And of course, congratulation to Sarah Palin, “Queenmaker”!  Thank you Sarah for supporting women and helping them advance politically.  Hopefully leaders of both parties can learn from your example.

22 Comments » Want an avatar? Get a gravatar!

  • Janis said:

    It’s lovely to see women winning! Yes, I do wish there were more liberal women, but if there aren’t, then that’s not the fault of the GOP women nor those who voted for them. These women should only be congratulated.

    The Dems know what they have to do in order to profit from women’s thirst for power and legitimacy — run and support powerful, skilled women candidates. I look forward to seeing them do it so we can celebrate these victories on both sides of the aisle.

    September 15, 2010 at 2:47 pm
  • Samsmom said:

    (Name shortened to fit your space.)
    Congratulations to all of the women on both sides of the aisle who ran yesterday -win or lose. Thank you for putting yourselves out there for all of us.

    September 15, 2010 at 3:40 pm
  • Bes said:

    “The Dems know what they have to do in order to profit from women’s thirst for power and legitimacy — run and support powerful, skilled women candidates”

    That would be interesting to see. I think a lot of Dem women lost their credibility during the 2008 Democratic festival of sexism and that sham of a nominating convention. That set of choices by the Dems would be hard to come back from however they don’t even recognize that they have a sexism problem. In other words I doubt anyone stupid enough to create or participate in the Democrat’s sexism problem is smart enough to solve the problem. The Dems only hope is an insurgent grass roots take over of the party, something like the Tea Party. I don’t think liberal elitism mixes well with grass roots practicality and appeal.

    September 15, 2010 at 4:37 pm
  • Janis said:

    “The Dems only hope is an insurgent grass roots take over of the party, something like the Tea Party.”

    I’ve been thinking the same thing, but I don’t think it will happen. The current Dems arrived because they coopted one grassroots movement already. I think that the Dean phenom in 2004 really illustrated to the Dem leadership that:

    1) there was a lot of dissatisfaction and energy out there in their party, and
    2) there was a SHITLOAD of money attached to it.

    In 2008, they coopted that and crafted a branding campaign that looked the same from the outside — millions of unique individuals sending their latte money in from teh Intarwebz all on their own! — but was 10,000% pre-packaged and establishment approved.

    They coopted that grassroots movement and turned it into pure astroturf … and it’s been revealed that they did it. The Dem grassroots are used, abused, demoralized at having been manipulated, and exhausted at this point. There will be no more Democratic grassroots for some time.

    I wish there were; I’d love to see both parties taken back from TPTB. I also fear that the Tea Party will be similarly coopted by the GOP party bigwigs, once they realize that this thing is real, scary, powerful, and not going away. Last night’s results may be the last straw for that.

    But I hope the Tea Partiers are just as cantankerous and ungovernable as they appear to be, because there will be infiltration at this point, just like the Deaniacs of 2004 turned into the Obots of 2008, only done up a bit more slickly.

    September 15, 2010 at 5:48 pm
  • Janis said:

    Crap — spamulator ate me …

    September 15, 2010 at 5:49 pm
  • Janis said:

    BTW, it’s O’Donnell. :-)

    September 15, 2010 at 7:59 pm
  • marille said:

    Senator Barbara Mikulsky from Maryland also won her primary, although there was nothing dramatic about that. she is establishment but was a strong Hillary backer.
    other liberal women on local elections won, some of them I can’t cheer on. the vast majority of our county’s board of election is female, but with one exception they all act like a cheer leading squat to the superintendent. they seem not to have ever heard of an oversight function to he superintendent and the school system. the county is devided in green and red zone and you can guess where the bottomless bucket of funds goes. we have schools with serious problems. no one listens, answers to emails, takes action. we have several parent coalitions. the board and the school system is numb to any problems. they listen to the superintendent who claims that our county has word class education and we certainly hold a record on the money spent. our parent coalition volunteered for the challengers, but the incumbants (all on the apple ballot “teacher endorsed”) won. and we know that the teachers in distressed schools get no support from their union.

    September 15, 2010 at 8:13 pm
  • BevWKY said:

    I wish there were; I’d love to see both parties taken back from TPTB. I also fear that the Tea Party will be similarly coopted by the GOP party bigwigs, once they realize that this thing is real, scary, powerful, and not going away. Last night’s results may be the last straw for that.

    But I hope the Tea Partiers are just as cantankerous and ungovernable as they appear to be, because there will be infiltration at this point, just like the Deaniacs of 2004 turned into the Obots of 2008, only done up a bit more slickly.

    It’s going to be truly difficult for the GOP to infiltrate something that “part” of it in the first place. That’s probably one of the biggest mistakes I keep seeing media pundits make all across the board, left to right. That the TP is some grassroots revolt within that party. Or even simply a conservative resurgence.

    Uh, no.

    It’s truly a movement made up of coservatives, independents and quite a few liberals who are fed up with the status quo and the things that have happened in the last few years. Simply American We The People who are tired of not being listened to by both parties.

    September 15, 2010 at 9:01 pm
  • marille said:

    just saw the politico article on Christine O Donnell. The hate machine is on. all the financial trouble coinciding with previous runs, a defaulting student loan, a defaulting mortgage. they think republicans can be shamed to not vote for her. the claim is that castle will not endorse her and that rove has conceded the general race.
    and then that Bill Maher made fun of her in 2006.
    it is a stinking sexist machine, reminds me very much of the net of lies they sun around Palin and democrats bought it. in the echo chamber of lies the person disappears and left is a sorry caricature of the target.
    it will need a serious effort to stop this from start.

    how are the liberal media portraying themselves by ridiculing someone who defaults on student and home loan?
    how are they portraying themselves by thinking Maher finding it too funny if some woman says she find lying disrespectful. what is wrong with that answer?

    September 16, 2010 at 12:03 am
  • BevWKY said:

    You know, I really shouldn’t try posting late at night when I’m half asleep and don’t have a grammar checker. ;-) I think what I was attempting to say is that it might be considerably difficult for something like the Tea Party movement to be co-opted by the GOP when it’s could turn out to be a larger representation of the American people than either of the two parties in the first place, maybe not in an actual national organiztion but in terms of that true local grassroots turnout at the pols where it counts.

    And that’s what terrifies both parties.

    September 16, 2010 at 4:22 am
  • Janis said:

    Bev, I know that the Teap Party presents itself as a mix, and that it’s membership is also a mix. But the fact is that they run candidates who tack right. This means that they will impinge on GOP territory first, and are a more immediate threat to them.

    This means that the GOP will go after them first.

    And just believing that the purity and cleanliness of their principles will protect them is bunk. When someone worth several billion dollars tries to take the wheel, the wheel gets taken. The ONLY thing that will protect the Tea Party is if it’s members expect it to get taken over and take explicit, ongoing steps to prevent it. Otherwise, it will be useless in four years.

    You don’t stay uninjured as a driver by pretending that you’re so good you won’t have an accident. You do it by expecting you will, and wearing a seatbelt. The Tea Party had damned well better buckle up — they are far too valuable a populist movement to succumb to the inflated opinion that inherent fabulousness will insulate them from outside threat. They must assume they will be infiltrated by money and take steps to prevent it — and continue to take them, like continuing to get flu shots every year.

    September 16, 2010 at 12:29 pm
  • Janis said:

    And the spamulator eats my comment again … :-(

    September 16, 2010 at 12:30 pm
  • BevWKY said:

    Bev, I know that the Tea Party presents itself as a mix, and that it’s membership is also a mix. But the fact is that they run candidates who tack right. This means that they will impinge on GOP territory first, and are a more immediate threat to them.

    This means that the GOP will go after them first.

    Actually, they just had their chance. They were called primaries. The GOP establishment found out that it doesn’t always go the way they think it will when dealing with the Tea Party movement and they better start playing by new rules.

    Now it’s the Democrat’s turn in November.

    The thing is, there were quite a few GOP incumbents going down before Tea Party insurgents, but it’s also happened to Democrats in primaries, too. We’re just not hearing about them. Not sure if it’s a lamestream media thing in that they tend to want to talk more about the so-called GOP civil war for some odd reason (of course, no ulterior motives there, yah know o.O) or if for some reason it actually is happening more on state and local levels with the Dems but it is happening. I ran across an article just this morning about a large number of Dem incumbents losing to TP challengers in state races in Maryland, I think it was.

    Of course, I could give the media the benefit of the doubt and say it might simply be that there’s not time left once everyone gets done talking about things like that Delaware race.

    I could, but I probably won’t. ;-)

    September 16, 2010 at 2:22 pm
  • Janis said:

    “Actually, they just had their chance. They were called primaries.”

    And you think the GOP is just going to throw up its hands now and say “Oh, well! They bested us! We give up!”

    The Tea Party will need to be vigilant. The GOP will not just sit there and say, “Welp, they beat us fair and square!”

    September 16, 2010 at 2:26 pm
  • BevWKY said:

    Probably not, but then again remember how so many of the TP leaders are women? I just ran acros this:

    http://michellemalkin.com/2010.....boyz-club/

    Even I’m going whoa. O_O

    The mud, it is a flying.

    The women, they ain’t backing down.

    This is getting really interesting. :-D

    September 16, 2010 at 3:20 pm
  • Bes said:

    Both the Dems and the Republicans and Corporate Media are lackeys for Corporate America which is profitable for them. So Any political party or movement that appeals to what is best for The People is going to get a lot of followers. Even if people aren’t drawn to the new movements core principals (Liberal or Conservative) they are going to be drawn to an image of government of The People, by The People and for The People as opposed to what we have now…a government of Corporate America, by Corporate American, for Corporate America. Also only people who are too stupid to find their way to register to vote still believe the Corporate Media’s “news” and opinion is worth listening to.

    September 16, 2010 at 3:22 pm
  • A different Amy said:

    I’m just curious, when Democratic Senate candidates Robin Carnahan of Missouri and Roxanne Conlin of Iowa won their primaries, did The New Agenda offer up congratulations in their blog? I used your search function and didn’t find anything, but maybe I’m missing something.

    I thought this was supposed to be a nonpartisan organization for all women. Where’s the love?

    September 17, 2010 at 12:05 am
  • Bes said:

    different Amy: I don’t remember hearing of Roxanne Conlin or Robin Carnahan. Many women here are fed up with the Dems and block them out now, after many years of sending our money and energy their way. If you think something should be covered here it is a good idea to bring it up yourself. I have quit listening or paying attention to the Dems. After the sexism I saw in 2008 I don’t know what it would take to get me to reengage. If Dems want to rehab their image with thinking women it is going to be up to them to make their case. For Dems to claim they are being treated unfairly is laughable to me after what they have done to Hillary and Palin and any other woman who stands for election.

    September 17, 2010 at 12:38 am
  • Amy Siskind said:

    A different Amy – would you like to write a blog piece about those two women for us? Unfortunately, I’ve never heard of either of them. We do, in fairness, support an equal amount of Dem women if you have been following our blog. But I think the excitement, and therefore the media coverage and public knowledge is on the TP and RNC side.

    September 17, 2010 at 8:25 am
  • marille said:

    bevWKY, we had primaries in MD and TP candidates could not run against dems. the only races outside democrats and republicans were the school boards and what I saw to my disgust was winning of the incumbants. not a single challenger from parent initiatives made the cut.

    September 17, 2010 at 11:24 pm
  • A different Amy said:

    Amy Siskind, I will try. But to tell you the truth, reading this blog (and others, political and otherwise) is turning in to something of a time-suck, keeping me from my real advocacy work–PTA stuff :) .

    September 19, 2010 at 6:48 pm
  • Optixmom said:

    A different Amy,
    I did look at the two candidates you mentioned and am extremely intrigued. I hope to put together something in regard to Roxanne Collin shortly because God knows we need women represented in Iowa. If elected she would be the first!

    –Optix

    September 19, 2010 at 6:50 pm

Leave your Response Want an avatar? Get a gravatar!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Community Room

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Comcast launches minority owned channels to comply with government regulation. Where are the woman controlled channels? http://thehill.com/blogs/hilli.....ommitments

    February 22, 2012 at 11:22 am

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Report on the status of women in the US media. And remember that US media is exported all over the world. http://wmc.3cdn.net/a6b2dc282c.....6b0hk8.pdf

    February 17, 2012 at 2:39 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Mexico’s ruling party picks a woman as presidential candidate. Josefina Vazquez Mota, 51 http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/06/.....?hpt=hp_t3

    February 6, 2012 at 4:25 pm

  • 1
    Respond
    Bes

    Washington State has an effective Reproductive rights group who proposes legislation at the STATE LEVEL.
    Reproductive Parity Act. http://www.prochoicewashington.org/

    January 30, 2012 at 2:36 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Report sheds light on the ways in which the media profits from elections while polluting political discourse and failing to cover issues. http://www.freepress.net/press.....1&t=3

    January 26, 2012 at 4:38 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Two studies show Media sexism in 2008 was responsible for Hillary being pushed from the race. Democrats allowed the situation. http://www.usnews.com/news/blo.....s-2008-bid

    January 23, 2012 at 1:04 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    BevWKY

    Interesting comparisons to the 2008 campaigns:
    http://conservatives4palin.com.....d-one.html

    January 15, 2012 at 11:37 am

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Washington State introduces legislation requiring all insurance sold in state which covers maternity to cover abortion http://blog.seattlepi.com/seat.....insurance/

    January 9, 2012 at 6:36 pm

Join the Conversation
The New Agenda is an organization devoted to improving the lives of women and girls.
Join our National Movement –
  • We Get Results
  • Become a Member
  • Get Email Alerts
  • Volunteer With Us

BUILD your NETWORK

The Mentor Exchange

Our Network of College Women

The New Agenda on Campus

Protecting our Teenage Girls

The New Agenda Foundation

We’re in the Media »

Click to see our latest stories in the media

More Stories »

    Recent Comments

    • Bes: Hey, PETA--Don't Women Deserve as Much Respect as Animals?
    • ryan: Hey, PETA--Don't Women Deserve as Much Respect as Animals?
    • ryan: Hey, PETA--Don't Women Deserve as Much Respect as Animals?
    • Bes: Community Room
    • Bes: Hey, PETA--Don't Women Deserve as Much Respect as Animals?
    • Allison: Hey, PETA--Don't Women Deserve as Much Respect as Animals?

    The Latest from our Blog

    • Hey, PETA–Don’t Women Deserve as Much Respect as Animals?
    • The Local Mom Effect
    • Every Issue is a Women’s Issue
    • Mary Rogan on Whitney Houston: A former addict’s perspective on a singer’s ruined life
    • Is It 2012 or 1812?

    Archives

    Pioneer Mentors

    • Gretchen Carlson
    • Claudia Poccia
    • Jacki Zehner

    Blogroll

    • 20-first
    • Afrocity
    • Amazing Women Rock
    • Catalyst
    • Elect Women Magazine
    • Equal Writes
    • FemaleScienceProfessor
    • Femisex
    • Hardy Girls Healthy Women
    • Jack & Jill Politics
    • Jenn Q. Public
    • Katalusis
    • MADE
    • Marinagraphy
    • Me and My 1000 Girlfriends, That's Who
    • MomsRising
    • One In Three Women
    • Smart Girl Nation
    • Still4Hill
    • Stray Yellar Dawg
    • Taylor Marsh
    • Tennessee Guerilla Women
    • TexasDarlin
    • The Confluence
    • The Red Pump Project
    • The Stiletto
    • The Vyne
    • United For Equality
    • Uppity Woman
    • What About Our Daughters
    • Women and Hollywood
    • WOMENomics

Find us Online

  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Flickr

Subscribe Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS)

The New Agenda is a 501(c)(4) organization dedicated to improving the lives of women and girls by bringing about systemic change in the media, at the workplace, at school and at home. More...

  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • Board of Directors
    • Welcome
    • FAQ’s
  • Media
    • Print & Internet
    • TV & Radio
    • Press Releases
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Get Involved
    • Email Alerts
    • We Spoke Out!
    • Volunteer
  • Features
  • Blog
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
    • TNA Store
  • Contact Us