The New Agenda - a voice for all women
Become a Member | Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • Board and Officers
    • Advisory Council
    • Young Women Leadership Council
    • FAQ's
    • We Get Results!
    • Contact Us
  • Media
    • Print & Internet
    • TV & Radio
    • Press Releases
  • Get Involved
    • Take Action!
    • Get Email Alerts
    • NGN Day
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
  • Features
  • Blog
Home » Unity, Women's History

‘Courage in women is often mistaken for insanity.’ – Women Get the Right to Vote

August 22, 2010

by The New AgendacloseAuthor: The New Agenda Name: The New Agenda
Email: manager@thenewagenda.net
Site:
About: See Authors Posts (83)

|
20 Comments
  • Email
  • Share
  • Tweet

The following piece was originally posted on our blog on June 1, 2010.  Since so many of our new viewers have subsequently sent it our way since then, we are posting it again!

This is the story of our Mothers and our Grandmothers who lived only 90 years ago.

A1

Remember, it was not until 1920 that women were granted the right to go to the polls and vote.

A2

The women were innocent and defenseless, but they were jailed nonetheless for picketing the White House, carrying signs asking for the vote.

A3

(Lucy Burns)

And by the end of the night, they were barely alive. Forty prison guards wielding clubs and their warden’s blessing went on a rampage against the 33 women wrongly convicted of ‘obstructing sidewalk traffic.’


They beat Lucy Burns, chained her hands to the cell bars above her head and left her hanging for the night, bleeding and gasping for air.

A4
(Dora Lewis)

They hurled Dora Lewis into a dark cell, smashed her head against an iron bed and knocked her out cold. Her cellmate, Alice Cosu, thought Lewis was dead and suffered a heart attack. Additional affidavits describe the guards grabbing, dragging, beating, choking, slamming, pinching, twisting and kicking the women.

Thus unfolded the Night of Terror on November 15, 1917, when the warden at the Occoquan Workhouse in Virginia ordered his guards to teach a lesson to the suffragists imprisoned there because they dared to picket Woodrow Wilson’s White House for the right to vote. For weeks, the women’s only water came from an open pail. Their food–all of it colorless slop–was infested with worms.

A5
(Alice Paul)

When one of the leaders, Alice Paul, embarked on a hunger strike, they tied her to a chair, forced a tube down her throat and poured liquid into her until she vomited. She was tortured like this for weeks until word was smuggled out to the press.

So, refresh my memory. Some women won’t vote this year because
- why, exactly? We have carpool duties? We have to get to work? Our vote doesn’t matter? It’s raining?

A6
(Mrs. Pauline Adams in the prison garb she wore while serving a sixty-day sentence.)

Last week, I went to a sparsely attended screening of HBO’s new movie ‘Iron Jawed Angels.’ It is a graphic depiction of the battle these women waged so that I could pull the curtain at the polling booth and have my say. I am ashamed to say I needed the reminder.

A7
(Miss Edith Ainge, of Jamestown , New York )

All these years later, voter registration is still my passion. But the actual act of voting had become less personal for me, more rote. Frankly, voting often felt more like an obligation than a privilege. Sometimes it was inconvenient.

A8

(Berthe Arnold, CSU graduate)

My friend Wendy, who is my age and studied women’s history, saw the HBO movie, too. When she stopped by my desk to talk about it, she looked angry. She was–with herself. ‘One thought kept coming back to me as I watched that movie,’ she said. ‘What would those women think of the way I use, or don’t use, my right to vote? All of us take it for granted now, not just younger women, but those of us who did seek to learn.’ The right to vote, she said, had become valuable to her ‘all over again.’

HBO released the movie on video and DVD . I wish all history, social studies and government teachers would include the movie in their curriculum I want it shown on Bunco night, too, and anywhere else women gather. I realize this isn’t our usual idea of socializing, but we are not voting in the numbers that we should be, and I think a little shock therapy is in order.

A9

(Conferring over ratification [of the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution] at [National Woman's Party] headquarters, Jackson Pl [ace] [ Washington , D.C. ]. L-R Mrs. Lawrence Lewis, Mrs. Abby Scott Baker, Anita Pollitzer, Alice Paul, Florence Boeckel, Mabel Vernon (standing, right))

It is jarring to watch Woodrow Wilson and his cronies try to persuade a psychiatrist to declare Alice Paul insane so that she could be permanently institutionalized. And it is inspiring to watch the doctor refuse. Alice Paul was strong, he said, and brave. That didn’t make her crazy.

The doctor admonished the men: ‘Courage in women is often mistaken for insanity.’

Please, if you are so inclined, pass this on to all the women you know.  We need to get out and vote and use this right that was fought so hard for by these very courageous women. Whether you vote  Democratic, Republican or Independent party – remember to vote.

A10

(Helena Hill Weed, Norwalk , Conn. Serving 3 day sentence in D.C. prison for carrying banner, ‘Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed.’)

History is being made.

20 Comments » Want an avatar? Get a gravatar!

  • Ellis said:

    Once I complained about working a 14-hour day as a election assistant and having just 4% turnout in my precinct. My then supervisor (biologically a woman) responded with, “the nice thing about being an American is, you don’t HAVE to vote.”

    She is also a Queen Bee and liked to say, “Boy, I wish there were more men in the building”. It makes one wonder why she chose to make a second career as a librarian. Perhaps it was a case of the wolf among the sheep.

    June 1, 2010 at 12:19 pm
  • Anna Belle said:

    This is a gorgeous photo essay and I’m glad to see it here.

    June 1, 2010 at 12:41 pm
  • Amy Siskind said:

    I’m wondering if while in jail, these women argued about which amongst them was worthy of being labeled a “feminist” (said tongue in cheek)!

    June 1, 2010 at 2:30 pm
  • Anna Belle said:

    Actually, Amy, you’d be surprised. Carrie Chapman Catt frequently criticized the Paul/Burns approach, and accused of them setting back the cause of suffragists across the nation. Thank goodness Paul & Burns did not listen to her and her supporters! By the end of it all, Catt was on board, of course.

    June 1, 2010 at 2:44 pm
  • Amy Siskind said:

    Oy AB!

    It’s going to be a long journey to unity. Fasten your seat belts!

    June 1, 2010 at 2:52 pm
  • Anna Belle said:

    And it goes on, of course. Here’s PBS arguing that it was Catt was the actual force behind the 19th amendment, not Paul. That’s a blatant lie, and the events of history show it was Paul and her campaign, which culminated in the Night of Terror that ultimately brought into being the 19th amendment.

    The truth, of course lies somewhere in between. Doubtless Paul’s methos would not have worked without decades of Catt’s softening up the powers that be. Doubtless Catt’s gentle approach would have failed miserably without Paul’s in your face tactics.

    The divisions in feminism today have deep roots, going back even before the Catt-Paul rhetorical wars, to the 14th amendment. I blogged about that here way back: http://thenewagenda.net/2009/0.....-fracture/

    June 1, 2010 at 2:53 pm
  • Valentina said:

    I saw in the Dallas Museum a photo of a woman (more recent) in the 50s who was in jail with her baby in her arms, for protesting for her rights. The amazing thing is that she was smiling, as if she couldn’t be happier anywhere else. That really caught my attention, and I wish I had a camera with me.

    June 1, 2010 at 3:07 pm
  • Valentina said:

    Amy, this photo essay is so beautiful… You give credit to many of the women who participated, and imply them all.

    I sent it to my family (everywhere) and friends.

    June 1, 2010 at 3:33 pm
  • Bes said:

    I think it is more important that female voices are heard than that we speak with one voice.

    June 1, 2010 at 3:50 pm
  • Valentina said:

    Wow Bes, you should coin that one!

    June 1, 2010 at 3:55 pm
  • Amy Siskind said:

    Great story Valentina – yes, it is inspiring to fight for what you believe in!

    Bes – great quote!

    June 1, 2010 at 4:03 pm
  • Janis said:

    Sorry, but after having my vote effectively invalidated in 2000 and then flat-out STOLEN in 2008 … I just do not see how marking that piece of paper matters. It means as much as voting did in the old Soviet Union. If voting were honest and counted and up-front, it would be a wonderful thing. It’s not. Until elections are honest, it is an empty gesture, and it sickens me to think that those women went through that hell for my own ex-party to invalidate my choice by giving my vote to a cheating, corrupt, snide, insulting son of a bitch out in the open — and be fellated by the world media for it.

    Voting means VERY LITTLE unless clean elections are insured.

    June 1, 2010 at 5:25 pm
  • Recovered Demoholic said:

    Brought to you by the Democratic Party: Woodrow Wilson, Jimmy Carter, Barack Obama.

    Congratulations again on the AAP retraction of ‘surgical nick.’ Still no word from MSM.

    June 2, 2010 at 9:25 am
  • Kathleen Wynne said:

    Amy,

    I think it relevant to point out, since these women sacrificed and suffered terribly, to get women the right to vote that they would also be just as adamant and committed to making certain our votes were being counted as cast!

    What’s the point of an election if our votes can be stolen and manilpulated because America has non-transparent elections? Be advised that those of us who have fought for years to achieve “meaningful” election reform were trumped by the German people in achieving this goal. They banned e-voting because the German Constitution considers “secret” vote counting (which is done inside the voting machine’s software) and/or in the back room by party leaders and those hired by them to count the votes out of sight of the average citizen.

    What baffles me is that the American people still believe that our elections are just fine, when all the evidence is there that someone like GW Bush can get into the WH for two terms and then the obama campaign can game the caucus system and then have the DNC Rules and By-laws committee break their own rules to award obama delegates he didn’t earn in order to “give” him the nomination.

    I’m certain these extraordinary and brave women patriots would agree with me when I assert that unless the American people recognize, as the German people did, that a democratic republic simply cannot exist unless the average citizen’s human right to see their votes being counted is protected and secured, then we are living in a sham democracy and very well explains why we are in the horrific mess we are in today with a corrupt government which has blatantly betrayed us for decades. They do this because they know “you can’t vote them out, if you didn’t vote them in.”

    June 4, 2010 at 12:45 pm
  • franziska said:

    that was cruel what they did to the suffragists says my daughter

    however, we had a discussion on comparing the fight against slavery with the one for women’s rights. the school kids of course think the first was a more important cause. the situation of women in the 17th and 18th century which had quite some similarities to slavery is unknown to them. the discussion then goes: ” women weren’t flagellated by their masters everyday”. “not every slave was. such cruelty depended whether you had a good or bad master, a good or bad husband”.
    as far as I know white women in the 17th or 18th century were not sold as children on the market. a couple centuries earlier they were forced into marriage as children.

    June 5, 2010 at 3:37 pm
  • Janis said:

    “as far as I know white women in the 17th or 18th century were not sold as children on the market”

    They were in the 19th. My grandmother was. Don’t talk to me about slavery and how white people can’t understand.

    June 5, 2010 at 9:22 pm
  • yttik said:

    Thanks for the photo essay!

    I share your frustration about not having votes counted, Janis. I got really discouraged years ago in a local election full of nonsense and swore off voting for good. But after a few weeks I realized that if they’re going to steal my vote, they damn well better have to work for it. And if they’re going to cheat my candidates out of primaries, they’re going to have to look me in the face while they’re doing it. I campaigned and caucused for Hillary, knowing the deck was stacked against her, knowing there was corruption going on, but I’d do it all again. And those Dems who looked at me all smug, sure aren’t looking so smug today.

    The thing about having the right to vote is that it isn’t just about marking a little box on a piece of paper, it’s about throwing a wrench in the best laid plans of tyrants and thugs. You don’t win very often, but you make their job a lot more difficult.

    August 22, 2010 at 5:38 pm
  • marille said:

    we went to the Alice Paul Institute to day for their annual celebration of womens equality day. the 90 years of voting and the new biography of Alice Paul by Mary Walton “A woman’s crucade, Alice Paul and the battle for the ballot. The author was there and introduced her book. they had actually a former women’s history student there who interviewed Alice Paul several times and the nurse who cared for her during her last 2 months of life.
    New jersey politicians were there, Robert Menendez who wants to give Alice Paul a posthumous award, Congressman Adler who supports the ERA.
    Anna Belle this new biography could help to have PBS retract their movie and redo the story. I think it is dangerous how the record of the battle was falsified. last week in her NYT column “my favorite August” Gail Collins summed up the battle from 1913 to 1920 to that the nagging women got wilson to change his mind.

    it takes a lot more than nagging and begging to make a step forward for women.

    August 22, 2010 at 10:31 pm
  • j a n said:

    I’m kind of surprised you haven’t dug a little deeper on this topic – as so many of your blog posts have been wonderful about rooting out bits of history we never hear about. Women (and black people!) in America could vote in 1776, as long as they owned property. They could vote for more than 30 years! And then this right was rescinded… and there is very little written about why that was.

    The 19th amendment is a good thing. But it’s also good to remember the U.S. was founded on equality.

    August 26, 2010 at 7:52 pm
  • Anna Belle Pfau said:

    Jan, thanks for the comment. As the resident women’s historian here, here are is my thinking on your comment:

    It really isn’t as easy as women who could own property could vote for 30 years. A very few women could vote in some places, never for 30 straight years, and those rights were sometimes granted, sometimes not, depending on who was controlling the voting booth. Remember that very few women could even own property, and those that did were almost universally widows. A woman had to get married and lose a husband and then refuse to marry again to own property. If she remarried, her property became his property and there went her right to vote. So I don’t consider it true women’s suffrage. It was almost like these women inherited their husband’s right to vote, or at least that’s how it was seen. Nowhere were women able to vote in enough numbers to manifest a feeling that they were able to affect political change, or even receive governance that considered their issues.

    Because of all these issues, it is a difficult subject to develop. A presentation of it as something we “lost” is not accurate, and neither is it appropriate to interpret this in any way as the founding fathers inclusion of women. It’s really more of a “look at this weird and largely meaningless anomaly.”

    And about our nation being founded on equality: I don’t believe the US was founded on equality. I believe the US was founded on the soon-to-be-realized dream of equality.

    The Declaration of Independence is a beautiful document, but it is only our founding document, not our governing document. The Declaration has always been at odds with our Constitution, and reconciling them has been the work of this nation for more than 200 years. Proud work, I think, because we have realized so much of what we dreamed of when we started, but that is largely the work of later generations.

    My 2 cents,
    AB

    August 27, 2010 at 12:32 pm

Leave your Response Want an avatar? Get a gravatar!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Community Room

  • 0
    Respond
    BevWKy

    Okay, maybe Warren not so extreme?
    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics.....lace-1991/

    May 19, 2012 at 12:31 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    BevWKY

    An extreme case of “identity politics” blowing up in someone’s face. Oye.
    http://tinyurl.com/7gluqzw

    May 18, 2012 at 12:34 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    BevWKY

    Great speech on VAWA:
    http://www.therightscoop.com/a.....women-act/

    May 17, 2012 at 11:17 am

  • 0
    Respond
    BevWKY

    Seen the new Susan B Anthony video about “Bureau of Womanhood Conformity”. Wow. Link goes to press release:

    http://tinyurl.com/7lke7uj

    May 17, 2012 at 10:58 am

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Obama lacks political will to crack down on Wall street crooks. Be sure to read the comments.
    http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs.....23945.html

    May 8, 2012 at 11:30 am

  • 0
    Respond
    BevWKY

    Yes, why? ;-)

    http://conservatives4palin.com.....evito.html

    May 8, 2012 at 9:56 am

  • 0
    Respond
    BevWKY

    Yes, but making women appear incapable of helping themselves is only half of it. It’s also talking about DECADES of Obama helping… o.O

    May 7, 2012 at 2:04 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    Kathy

    I am appalled at that ad. Does Obama seriously think he can appeal to women by showing us we are not capable of helping ourselves??

    May 7, 2012 at 1:37 pm

Join the Conversation
The New Agenda is an organization devoted to improving the lives of women and girls.
Join our National Movement –
  • We Get Results
  • Become a Member
  • Get Email Alerts
  • Volunteer With Us

BUILD your NETWORK

The Mentor Exchange

Our Network of College Women

The New Agenda on Campus

Protecting our Teenage Girls

The New Agenda Foundation

We’re in the Media »

Click to see our latest stories in the media

More Stories »

    Recent Comments

    • Bes: Picture It: Work-Life Balance
    • Linda Stern: Barbara Walters Attacks Mimi Alford
    • marille: What is going on with our classic channels? What about our opera and concert programs?
    • franzi: What is going on with our classic channels? What about our opera and concert programs?
    • Luanne: What is going on with our classic channels? What about our opera and concert programs?
    • Edee Lemonier: What is going on with our classic channels? What about our opera and concert programs?

    The Latest from our Blog

    • Can you meet me for breakfast or lunch?
    • What is going on with our classic channels? What about our opera and concert programs?
    • Picture It: Work-Life Balance
    • 12 Telling Stats on Female MBAs
    • WSJ Moderator Squelches Suzy Welch

    Archives

    Pioneer Mentors

    • Gretchen Carlson
    • Claudia Poccia
    • Jacki Zehner

    Blogroll

    • 20-first
    • Afrocity
    • Amazing Women Rock
    • Catalyst
    • Elect Women Magazine
    • Equal Writes
    • FemaleScienceProfessor
    • Femisex
    • Hardy Girls Healthy Women
    • Jack & Jill Politics
    • Jenn Q. Public
    • Katalusis
    • MADE
    • Marinagraphy
    • Me and My 1000 Girlfriends, That's Who
    • MomsRising
    • One In Three Women
    • Smart Girl Nation
    • Still4Hill
    • Stray Yellar Dawg
    • Taylor Marsh
    • Tennessee Guerilla Women
    • TexasDarlin
    • The Confluence
    • The Red Pump Project
    • The Stiletto
    • The Vyne
    • United For Equality
    • Uppity Woman
    • What About Our Daughters
    • Women and Hollywood
    • WOMENomics

Find us Online

  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Flickr

Subscribe Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS)

The New Agenda is a 501(c)(4) organization dedicated to improving the lives of women and girls by bringing about systemic change in the media, at the workplace, at school and at home. More...

  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • Board of Directors
    • Welcome
    • FAQ’s
  • Media
    • Print & Internet
    • TV & Radio
    • Press Releases
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Get Involved
    • Email Alerts
    • We Spoke Out!
    • Volunteer
  • Features
  • Blog
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
    • TNA Store
  • Contact Us