<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glenn Beck Honors Historical Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewagenda.net/2010/07/09/glenn-beck-honors-historical-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2010/07/09/glenn-beck-honors-historical-women/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeanLouise</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2010/07/09/glenn-beck-honors-historical-women/comment-page-1/#comment-48104</link>
		<dc:creator>JeanLouise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 04:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=21342#comment-48104</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a 100% with Uppity Woman on this one.  Beck blows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a 100% with Uppity Woman on this one.  Beck blows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uppity Woman</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2010/07/09/glenn-beck-honors-historical-women/comment-page-1/#comment-48100</link>
		<dc:creator>Uppity Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=21342#comment-48100</guid>
		<description>Glenn back has a camera
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGfpURNYpis


The Psychosis that is......Chickdom. Audio.

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201001200013


Shove it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn back has a camera<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGfpURNYpis" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGfpURNYpis</a></p>
<p>The Psychosis that is&#8230;&#8230;Chickdom. Audio.</p>
<p><a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201001200013" rel="nofollow">http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201001200013</a></p>
<p>Shove it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2010/07/09/glenn-beck-honors-historical-women/comment-page-1/#comment-48066</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=21342#comment-48066</guid>
		<description>Pro-choice means the woman chooses.  Sounds like precisely what happened in your friend&#039;s case; although it&#039;s not a choice I would have made personally, it worked for her mom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pro-choice means the woman chooses.  Sounds like precisely what happened in your friend&#8217;s case; although it&#8217;s not a choice I would have made personally, it worked for her mom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puma for Life</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2010/07/09/glenn-beck-honors-historical-women/comment-page-1/#comment-48065</link>
		<dc:creator>Puma for Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=21342#comment-48065</guid>
		<description>Not wanting to get into the rape/aborton discussion, but I do know someone who was the product of rape. Her mother gave birth to her and she went on to become a minister and very loving person.  So, yes, I am pro-choice, but being pro-choice means that it is ok to be pro-life and give birth to a child that is a product of rape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not wanting to get into the rape/aborton discussion, but I do know someone who was the product of rape. Her mother gave birth to her and she went on to become a minister and very loving person.  So, yes, I am pro-choice, but being pro-choice means that it is ok to be pro-life and give birth to a child that is a product of rape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BevWKY</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2010/07/09/glenn-beck-honors-historical-women/comment-page-1/#comment-47987</link>
		<dc:creator>BevWKY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=21342#comment-47987</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Well okay then, Bev. The “expert” thing was uncalled for but I’ll overlook it as a snarl because you probably love Glenn. I got used to that kind of tone during the Primaries. It’s an invitation to a brawl, and I respect AMY far too much to play that with you.&lt;/i&gt;

You have no idea what my overall opinion of Beck or anyone else is, so don&#039;t assume. I make up my own mind. OTOH, I am automatically suspicious of anyone who claims to know everything about someone on the basis on individual comments... without offering proof in the form of actual links or references that I can look at or check myself. 

I&#039;m funny that way. Shouldn&#039;t we all be? 

Plus, you still haven&#039;t provided any real proof of the things you&#039;re claiming, Uppity Woman, so all I know is that they sound no different on the surface than things people toss out as memes about many people in the national spotlight - including Obama and both of the Clintons. You want fair-minded people to listen to you and give such ravings about people on either side some credit, then do better than that or they&#039;re going to think you&#039;re simply reacting just because someone&#039;s name comes up, rather than to the content of the post. 

Which, by the way, is a very important topic. Because while I &lt;b&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/b&gt; watch Glenn Beck normally, I have begun following his Founding Fridays series and it&#039;s a fascinating look at what we&#039;re lost from this country&#039;s history. In particular, the episodes on black founders and women founders were mind-blowing. I could care less whether it&#039;s Beck or the man in the moon that is finally highlighting these people. Isn&#039;t it simply great that somebody finally is bringing them back to our attention? 

Or is the game of shooting the messenger more important? 

Because if it is, one has to wonder at what point we lose out on the actual process of learning things about each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Well okay then, Bev. The “expert” thing was uncalled for but I’ll overlook it as a snarl because you probably love Glenn. I got used to that kind of tone during the Primaries. It’s an invitation to a brawl, and I respect AMY far too much to play that with you.</i></p>
<p>You have no idea what my overall opinion of Beck or anyone else is, so don&#8217;t assume. I make up my own mind. OTOH, I am automatically suspicious of anyone who claims to know everything about someone on the basis on individual comments&#8230; without offering proof in the form of actual links or references that I can look at or check myself. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m funny that way. Shouldn&#8217;t we all be? </p>
<p>Plus, you still haven&#8217;t provided any real proof of the things you&#8217;re claiming, Uppity Woman, so all I know is that they sound no different on the surface than things people toss out as memes about many people in the national spotlight &#8211; including Obama and both of the Clintons. You want fair-minded people to listen to you and give such ravings about people on either side some credit, then do better than that or they&#8217;re going to think you&#8217;re simply reacting just because someone&#8217;s name comes up, rather than to the content of the post. </p>
<p>Which, by the way, is a very important topic. Because while I <b>don&#8217;t</b> watch Glenn Beck normally, I have begun following his Founding Fridays series and it&#8217;s a fascinating look at what we&#8217;re lost from this country&#8217;s history. In particular, the episodes on black founders and women founders were mind-blowing. I could care less whether it&#8217;s Beck or the man in the moon that is finally highlighting these people. Isn&#8217;t it simply great that somebody finally is bringing them back to our attention? </p>
<p>Or is the game of shooting the messenger more important? </p>
<p>Because if it is, one has to wonder at what point we lose out on the actual process of learning things about each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2010/07/09/glenn-beck-honors-historical-women/comment-page-1/#comment-47962</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 19:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=21342#comment-47962</guid>
		<description>Anna Belle, I remember when I was a teenager when Geraldine Ferraro was running as veep for Mondale, and she was a pro-choice catholic.  I was in church one Sunday during the campaign, and they actually invited this Irish priest -- from Ireland, he wasn&#039;t even AMERICAN and had NO BUSINESS sounding off about OUR fucking elections -- to come in and instruct we simple-minded little cogs as to why Geraldine Ferraro was evil and bad and wrong because she was pro-choice.  I still remember feeling this silent upwelling of fury from the women in the pews; I don&#039;t know if this was the reason, but that was the year that we stopped going to church as a family, and as we all know, it&#039;s the women that bring families to church each week.  It was my mom that was pissed, and that&#039;s why we stopped going.  (I&#039;m atheist at this point; the one thing I retained from my catholic upbringing was a love for the great organ music and my confirmation name, which was my grandmother&#039;s middle name.)

All I could think of was that that scummy, oily old bastard would have creamed himself for a handshake and photo op with Irish catholic Teddy Kennedy, &lt;i&gt;who had exactly the same opinions on abortion as Ferraro did&lt;/i&gt;.  But she was a &lt;i&gt;woman&lt;/i&gt; who held those opinions, and was thus a target for bilious throat-filling acidic hatred instead of unctuous hero-worship.

This is no different just because it&#039;s women who are guilty of it.  Most of them praise Jimmy Carter to the skies for being the liberal dreamboat hubby or something, while he has exactly the same opinions on abortion as Sarah Palin.  They are spewing far more stomach-churning hate toward women than they would ever dream of aiming at men with the same opinions.  Push comes to shove, they are &lt;i&gt;weak, scared little kids&lt;/i&gt;.  Little teenybopper empowerfulated pretend-feminists who, for all their rah-rah-blah-blah about girl powah haven&#039;t got the spine to take on a man and never will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anna Belle, I remember when I was a teenager when Geraldine Ferraro was running as veep for Mondale, and she was a pro-choice catholic.  I was in church one Sunday during the campaign, and they actually invited this Irish priest &#8212; from Ireland, he wasn&#8217;t even AMERICAN and had NO BUSINESS sounding off about OUR fucking elections &#8212; to come in and instruct we simple-minded little cogs as to why Geraldine Ferraro was evil and bad and wrong because she was pro-choice.  I still remember feeling this silent upwelling of fury from the women in the pews; I don&#8217;t know if this was the reason, but that was the year that we stopped going to church as a family, and as we all know, it&#8217;s the women that bring families to church each week.  It was my mom that was pissed, and that&#8217;s why we stopped going.  (I&#8217;m atheist at this point; the one thing I retained from my catholic upbringing was a love for the great organ music and my confirmation name, which was my grandmother&#8217;s middle name.)</p>
<p>All I could think of was that that scummy, oily old bastard would have creamed himself for a handshake and photo op with Irish catholic Teddy Kennedy, <i>who had exactly the same opinions on abortion as Ferraro did</i>.  But she was a <i>woman</i> who held those opinions, and was thus a target for bilious throat-filling acidic hatred instead of unctuous hero-worship.</p>
<p>This is no different just because it&#8217;s women who are guilty of it.  Most of them praise Jimmy Carter to the skies for being the liberal dreamboat hubby or something, while he has exactly the same opinions on abortion as Sarah Palin.  They are spewing far more stomach-churning hate toward women than they would ever dream of aiming at men with the same opinions.  Push comes to shove, they are <i>weak, scared little kids</i>.  Little teenybopper empowerfulated pretend-feminists who, for all their rah-rah-blah-blah about girl powah haven&#8217;t got the spine to take on a man and never will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Belle Pfau</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2010/07/09/glenn-beck-honors-historical-women/comment-page-1/#comment-47941</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Belle Pfau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 10:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=21342#comment-47941</guid>
		<description>Janis, I love your commentary! You are, of course, absolutely right, although you did forget to ask Claire how much time she&#039;d spent opposing the voluminous amount of male persons currently holding office and that same opinion she finds so evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janis, I love your commentary! You are, of course, absolutely right, although you did forget to ask Claire how much time she&#8217;d spent opposing the voluminous amount of male persons currently holding office and that same opinion she finds so evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2010/07/09/glenn-beck-honors-historical-women/comment-page-1/#comment-47934</link>
		<dc:creator>anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 05:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=21342#comment-47934</guid>
		<description>uppity woman agree with you. looked at the long version of Beck&#039;s statement on historical women. it sounds ot me like entertainment, like did ya know and something form the guinness book of records. this was no adequate portrayal of women in history, although I learned under what circumstance some women were allowed to vote in some states in the 17th century (owning property, the right was taken away when they voted against the dominating party who gave them the right). 
 I am with you janis voting women no matter what. if no women are running only for a male who has a significant stance pro women. here in maryland we have something special the &quot;reconsideration law&quot; because we marylanders are so emotional that in horrendous cases we send the guys for decades to prison. so the first judge usually halves the lay people&#039;s sentence. within five years the criminal can request a reconsideration hearing and some have gotten 14,16, 16 years off and were out in just a few years with diminution credits. has happened with multiple murderers, child rapists, multiple sexual assault and the ones out quickly murdered again. so far nobody takes this law on because keeping guys 60 years in prison is too expensive and the defense lawyers are almighty. a candidate including a male who stands up against this lobby and gets the process rolling to abandon the reconsideration law will get my vote. I am turning it around. female candidates get support no matter how much I agree, male candidates need to earn my vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uppity woman agree with you. looked at the long version of Beck&#8217;s statement on historical women. it sounds ot me like entertainment, like did ya know and something form the guinness book of records. this was no adequate portrayal of women in history, although I learned under what circumstance some women were allowed to vote in some states in the 17th century (owning property, the right was taken away when they voted against the dominating party who gave them the right).<br />
 I am with you janis voting women no matter what. if no women are running only for a male who has a significant stance pro women. here in maryland we have something special the &#8220;reconsideration law&#8221; because we marylanders are so emotional that in horrendous cases we send the guys for decades to prison. so the first judge usually halves the lay people&#8217;s sentence. within five years the criminal can request a reconsideration hearing and some have gotten 14,16, 16 years off and were out in just a few years with diminution credits. has happened with multiple murderers, child rapists, multiple sexual assault and the ones out quickly murdered again. so far nobody takes this law on because keeping guys 60 years in prison is too expensive and the defense lawyers are almighty. a candidate including a male who stands up against this lobby and gets the process rolling to abandon the reconsideration law will get my vote. I am turning it around. female candidates get support no matter how much I agree, male candidates need to earn my vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2010/07/09/glenn-beck-honors-historical-women/comment-page-1/#comment-47928</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 03:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=21342#comment-47928</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care about Angle.  This is one more piece of proof as far as I&#039;m concerned that voting women-only gets you ahead in the long run.  Think about all those women who ran and won in the recent spate of primary elections.  Among the ones I knew by name, there were (dramatic unveil):

&lt;i&gt;Four decent people, and one nutcase (Angle).&lt;/i&gt;

In other words, so voting women only gets you an 80% pretty-good rating.

Where the hell else are you going to get odds like that?  You get odds like that in Vegas, and you go home a millionaire.  What more proof do you need that even among the supposedly Oh So Eeevihl Conservatives, if you just VOTE WOMEN ALL THE TIME, things will improve?  Even the female nutballs are an improvement over the male ones!

And yet progressive women will still whine and stamp over doing this.  It&#039;s absolutely insane.  It&#039;s like trying to explain the Monty Hall problem or the Shell Game to stupid people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care about Angle.  This is one more piece of proof as far as I&#8217;m concerned that voting women-only gets you ahead in the long run.  Think about all those women who ran and won in the recent spate of primary elections.  Among the ones I knew by name, there were (dramatic unveil):</p>
<p><i>Four decent people, and one nutcase (Angle).</i></p>
<p>In other words, so voting women only gets you an 80% pretty-good rating.</p>
<p>Where the hell else are you going to get odds like that?  You get odds like that in Vegas, and you go home a millionaire.  What more proof do you need that even among the supposedly Oh So Eeevihl Conservatives, if you just VOTE WOMEN ALL THE TIME, things will improve?  Even the female nutballs are an improvement over the male ones!</p>
<p>And yet progressive women will still whine and stamp over doing this.  It&#8217;s absolutely insane.  It&#8217;s like trying to explain the Monty Hall problem or the Shell Game to stupid people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bes</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2010/07/09/glenn-beck-honors-historical-women/comment-page-1/#comment-47924</link>
		<dc:creator>Bes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 01:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=21342#comment-47924</guid>
		<description>Claire:  We have actual real problems in our country that could be improved.  So I am not interested in contorted what-if questions.  &quot;What if a girl is raped by her father and is as a result pregnant what do you say&quot;  Here is what I want to know from perspective politicians.  How will you balance the budget, how will you improve schools, how will you keep me from being tax poor, since at least 30% of our kids don&#039;t graduate from high school how will you seal the border so that illegals won&#039;t cross the border and take the jobs that our own illiterate citizens need and in the process drive down wages for us all.  We don&#039;t need to invent strange problems that probably affect 2 people as a basis to choose politicians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claire:  We have actual real problems in our country that could be improved.  So I am not interested in contorted what-if questions.  &#8220;What if a girl is raped by her father and is as a result pregnant what do you say&#8221;  Here is what I want to know from perspective politicians.  How will you balance the budget, how will you improve schools, how will you keep me from being tax poor, since at least 30% of our kids don&#8217;t graduate from high school how will you seal the border so that illegals won&#8217;t cross the border and take the jobs that our own illiterate citizens need and in the process drive down wages for us all.  We don&#8217;t need to invent strange problems that probably affect 2 people as a basis to choose politicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

