The New Agenda - a voice for all women
Become a Member | Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • Board and Officers
    • Advisory Council
    • Young Women Leadership Council
    • FAQ's
    • We Get Results!
    • Contact Us
  • Media
    • Print & Internet
    • TV & Radio
    • Press Releases
  • Get Involved
    • Take Action!
    • Get Email Alerts
    • NGN Day
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
  • Features
  • Blog
Home » Opportunity

Diversity in NIH Director’s Pioneer Awards

June 2, 2010

by OptixmomcloseAuthor: Optixmom Name:
Email: editor@thenewagenda.net
Site:
About: See Authors Posts (64)

|
3 Comments
  • Email
  • Share
  • Tweet

The opinions expressed herein are those of the author, and not necessarily those of The New Agenda.

On a semi-regular basis I like to do a news search on “women in science” just to see what comes up on the search engine radar.  I stumbled across an article about the lack of gender diversity in prestigious scientific awards in Canada.  The author of this Canadian article was trying to figure out why none of the recipients of these prestigious awards were women.  She listed the search criteria of the nominating committees and how certain criteria would automatically create a gender bias:

In the first stage, 40 proposals defining specific areas of research were approved as target areas for recruitment. Already we have a problem: Narrowly defining a research area is never a good way to find the very best and in this case it biased the pools towards male nominees.

In the second stage, the groups conducted searches for super-star candidates to fit their targeted research area. Here we run into serious problems. There is no transparency. We don’t know the composition of the committees nor how they conducted their searches. By all accounts, they were conducted by “informal networking,” a process that is highly susceptible to discrimination, even when all concerned have the best intentions. Why did all of the groups nominate men?

As I read further into her article she brought up search criteria that was developed by the United States National Institute of Health (NIH) for their Director’s Pioneer Award that led it to be a success in gender diversity.

Perhaps we can learn from the experience of our neighbours to the south. The American NIH Pioneer Awards are five-year $2.5 million grants to support highly innovative research. In the first year that they were offered, nine out of nine awards went to white men; in that year 61 out of the 64 judges were men. Members of the scientific community, both men and women, protested loudly. In 2005 awards went to six women and seven men. What was different?

The turnaround in the Pioneer Program was a consequence of the implementation of clear guidelines about how searches should be conducted. These guidelines include a wide-reaching call for nominations, encouragement of self-nomination, a search committee that is representative of the research community and a final review of the deliberation to ensure that gender diversity has been reasonably accounted for in the final pool of candidates.

I wanted to see for myself how successful this NIH award program was at nominating a diverse group of candidates, and I have to say it is great!  Take a look at the award recipients from 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009.  since the program committee changed their search strategy in 2005 they have awarded 35% of their Pioneer awards to women scientists.  {Optix gives NIH a high five!}

It can be seen from the changes that NIH implemented that the old way of doing things in the areas of awarding scientific excellence were indeed biased toward men.  This strategy that is being used at NIH should be reviewed and considered by many other groups within and outside the area of science.  Whenever a committee is looking for a slate of potential exceptional candidates and the goal is gender diversity, the NIH’s guidelines can help structure the search to meet that goal.

3 Comments » Want an avatar? Get a gravatar!

  • Bes said:

    Thanks for this post. Usually medical research is conducted on males only because females are so different that they might skew the results. Then what ever is discovered from the research is applied to both women and men because women are obviously the same as men. Something is very wrong with this thinking and women’s tax money is going to support this thinking. Maybe more women in the system will bring some sanity.

    June 3, 2010 at 12:35 pm
  • yttik said:

    Ahh, so when the playing field is level and and the biases towards men are removed, women seem to do a pretty good job of competing with men as equals.

    June 3, 2010 at 1:49 pm
  • Ellis said:

    This situation for women has improved. Yet, in the first year, women received 46% of the awards. Thereafter, women received 31%, 33% 25%, and 38% of the awards available. The field has been leveled somewhat it appears that there is still some slope to it.

    June 4, 2010 at 12:06 am

Leave your Response Want an avatar? Get a gravatar!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Community Room

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Obama lacks political will to crack down on Wall street crooks. Be sure to read the comments.
    http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs.....23945.html

    May 8, 2012 at 11:30 am

  • 0
    Respond
    BevWKY

    Yes, why? ;-)

    http://conservatives4palin.com.....evito.html

    May 8, 2012 at 9:56 am

  • 0
    Respond
    BevWKY

    Yes, but making women appear incapable of helping themselves is only half of it. It’s also talking about DECADES of Obama helping… o.O

    May 7, 2012 at 2:04 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    Kathy

    I am appalled at that ad. Does Obama seriously think he can appeal to women by showing us we are not capable of helping ourselves??

    May 7, 2012 at 1:37 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    BevWKY

    Does anyone honestly believe Obama’s “Julia” story equals liberation for women? http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=51265

    May 7, 2012 at 1:19 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Strange, Romney’s Mormon family not polygamist BUT Obama’s father was polygamist. I didn’t realize!
    http://crayfisher.wordpress.co...../#comments

    April 20, 2012 at 12:57 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Sounders, Seattle’s women’s soccer team, draws large enthusiastic crowd in first exhibition game
    http://seattletimes.nwsource.c.....ers10.html

    April 11, 2012 at 4:39 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    If the Dems and Reps don’t start talking REAL women’s issues soon, I may have found my write in candidate!
    http://shine.yahoo.com/work-mo.....00637.html

    April 6, 2012 at 1:18 pm

Join the Conversation
The New Agenda is an organization devoted to improving the lives of women and girls.
Join our National Movement –
  • We Get Results
  • Become a Member
  • Get Email Alerts
  • Volunteer With Us

BUILD your NETWORK

The Mentor Exchange

Our Network of College Women

The New Agenda on Campus

Protecting our Teenage Girls

The New Agenda Foundation

We’re in the Media »

Click to see our latest stories in the media

More Stories »

    Recent Comments

    • marille: What's The Problem With The National Women's History Museum?
    • Linda Denny: What's The Problem With The National Women's History Museum?
    • RevAmyinSC: The "XX" Factor in the GOP Vice Presidential Selection
    • RevAmyinSC: What's The Problem With The National Women's History Museum?
    • MaryL: Wrong head is rolling at Yahoo
    • Bes: The "XX" Factor in the GOP Vice Presidential Selection

    The Latest from our Blog

    • 12 Telling Stats on Female MBAs
    • WSJ Moderator Squelches Suzy Welch
    • Wrong head is rolling at Yahoo
    • Happy Mother’s Day!!!
    • The “XX” Factor in the GOP Vice Presidential Selection

    Archives

    Pioneer Mentors

    • Gretchen Carlson
    • Claudia Poccia
    • Jacki Zehner

    Blogroll

    • 20-first
    • Afrocity
    • Amazing Women Rock
    • Catalyst
    • Elect Women Magazine
    • Equal Writes
    • FemaleScienceProfessor
    • Femisex
    • Hardy Girls Healthy Women
    • Jack & Jill Politics
    • Jenn Q. Public
    • Katalusis
    • MADE
    • Marinagraphy
    • Me and My 1000 Girlfriends, That's Who
    • MomsRising
    • One In Three Women
    • Smart Girl Nation
    • Still4Hill
    • Stray Yellar Dawg
    • Taylor Marsh
    • Tennessee Guerilla Women
    • TexasDarlin
    • The Confluence
    • The Red Pump Project
    • The Stiletto
    • The Vyne
    • United For Equality
    • Uppity Woman
    • What About Our Daughters
    • Women and Hollywood
    • WOMENomics

Find us Online

  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Flickr

Subscribe Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS)

The New Agenda is a 501(c)(4) organization dedicated to improving the lives of women and girls by bringing about systemic change in the media, at the workplace, at school and at home. More...

  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • Board of Directors
    • Welcome
    • FAQ’s
  • Media
    • Print & Internet
    • TV & Radio
    • Press Releases
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Get Involved
    • Email Alerts
    • We Spoke Out!
    • Volunteer
  • Features
  • Blog
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
    • TNA Store
  • Contact Us