The New Agenda - a voice for all women
Become a Member | Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • Board and Officers
    • Advisory Council
    • Young Women Leadership Council
    • FAQ's
    • We Get Results!
    • Contact Us
  • Media
    • Print & Internet
    • TV & Radio
    • Press Releases
  • Get Involved
    • Take Action!
    • Get Email Alerts
    • NGN Day
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
  • Features
  • Blog
Home » Safety, Sexism

Harold Ford Keeps Up Sexist Rhetoric

February 4, 2010

by The New AgendacloseAuthor: The New Agenda Name: agenda
Email: editor@thenewagenda.net
Site: http://thenewagenda.net
About: See Authors Posts (438)

|
12 Comments
  • Email
  • Share
  • Tweet

Seems Harold Ford Jr. just can’t help himself. Can’t hold back the sexist rhetoric.

Skip to 4:15 and hear him refer to Senator Kirsten Gillibrand as “young lady.” Well, technically Mr. Ford, Senator Gillibrand is 4 years OLDER than you. Just sayin!

The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Harold Ford Jr.
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor Economy

So once again Mr. Ford: Get Your Sexism Out of New York!!!

12 Comments » Want an avatar? Get a gravatar!

  • KendallJ said:

    He’s a jackass, but I didn’t hear him say anything sexist. Referring to Gillibrand as a young lady doesn’t strike me as sexist!

    February 4, 2010 at 2:03 pm
  • Bes said:

    No comments because what do you say? With Democrats it happens again and again and again. How do party leaders get so dumb they can’t figure out that 52% of the population is female and females vote in larger numbers than males?

    February 4, 2010 at 2:47 pm
  • KendallJ said:

    Bes,

    Women are tought to hate each other and the pols count on that!

    February 4, 2010 at 3:31 pm
  • marille said:

    why is being called “young lady” is sexist?
    the usual terms of sexism in partisan politics was dumb and pretty or ugly and old. both can be portrayed as bitches. gillibrand is not old, not ugly and not dumb. neither of these would go, she is not seen as that beautiful to be used in direction porn. all Ford has left, is that she is not old. despite that she is older than him. in that setting young lady gets associated with unexperienced, given a shot into politics by the governor.
    to use age is always a subtle way to discriminate women. and “Lady”. remember senator from Pennsylvania to congresswoman Bachman “Act like a lady”. as female you don’t want to be called a lady in politics. the appropriate term is the junior senator from New York and every other term is inappropriate and demeaning.

    February 4, 2010 at 8:04 pm
  • Bes said:

    Male politicians need to refer to female politicians by their title. They need to understand that they demean themselves by with their sexist comments.

    February 4, 2010 at 10:38 pm
  • Amy Siskind said:

    KendallJ,

    I would call girls in their teens “young lady”.

    To use that term on a sitting senator shows that this man has programmed his mind to demean her – plain and simple. Not to mention that he is 39, and she is 43.

    How would it ring to you if Sen Gillibrand ran against, say former Governor Pataki and she referred to him as “young man”?

    February 4, 2010 at 10:42 pm
  • yttik said:

    For those of you who don’t understand the implication of calling a grown woman, a US Senator, “young lady” it’s a bit like calling a man, “boy.” It’s intended to disrespect and put them in their place.

    February 4, 2010 at 11:24 pm
  • KendallJ said:

    O.K. I get your points. I just don’t want to be some one who over reads into things. Nowadays any critique of Obama is considered racist, whether it is or not. They over-reached to accuse the Clintons of being racist at every turn. They did the same thing to Palin. I think we should be careful not to do the same here. If Gillibrand was say Barbara Boxers age, clearly much older, I’d be pissed, but I think this is borderline and not blatant at all. With that being said, I can see your points and on some level agree with you all.

    February 5, 2010 at 12:49 am
  • Optixmom said:

    I was at my alma mater the day after this piece aired on the Report and it was the “topic” of the day with the female PhD students. They realized that “young lady” was used as a demeaning term. These women are in their 20′s and they find it offensive to be called “young lady” by anyone. Two of them commented to me that it was a term used by their parents when they were being disciplined as teens. It would be like Gillibrand calling Ford, “little man” as one might when describing a child in an endearing way because he has done something man-worthy.

    February 5, 2010 at 7:57 am
  • Mollie said:

    He should have just called her an old lady.

    February 5, 2010 at 12:21 pm
  • Kiuku said:

    This is overt sexism; it is neither subtle or questionable.

    Calling a woman over the age of 25 a “young lady” is demeaning. It is demeaning to anyone over 20, but sometimes there can be confusion as to whether or not she is a teenager.

    Calling a woman of accomplishment a “young lady” is sexist, and meant to change the issue from an objective topic to subjective ones, such as the woman herself, where men can wield sexism. Using the word “lady” among professionals at any point in time is simply not dignified.

    He has clearly used the words “young lady” to demean women around him. I’ve had men do it to me. That men cannot treat women who are in their professional league in any way different than they treat women in their personal lives is a topic worthy of discussion.

    February 5, 2010 at 3:15 pm
  • Karen said:

    Sometimes, the context determines whether or not a certain word is sexist. When I was still working at Wendy’s, I had a different manager – a man – for a few days. He kept referring to me as “Sweetie” If he was my boyfriend or my husband, I would probably consider it cute and endearing. However, his comment constantly irritated me, and I kept thinking, “We just met. I don’t know you.” Fortunately, he stopped when I told him it bothered me.

    February 7, 2010 at 9:41 am

Leave your Response Want an avatar? Get a gravatar!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Community Room

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Obama lacks political will to crack down on Wall street crooks. Be sure to read the comments.
    http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs.....23945.html

    May 8, 2012 at 11:30 am

  • 0
    Respond
    BevWKY

    Yes, why? ;-)

    http://conservatives4palin.com.....evito.html

    May 8, 2012 at 9:56 am

  • 0
    Respond
    BevWKY

    Yes, but making women appear incapable of helping themselves is only half of it. It’s also talking about DECADES of Obama helping… o.O

    May 7, 2012 at 2:04 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    Kathy

    I am appalled at that ad. Does Obama seriously think he can appeal to women by showing us we are not capable of helping ourselves??

    May 7, 2012 at 1:37 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    BevWKY

    Does anyone honestly believe Obama’s “Julia” story equals liberation for women? http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=51265

    May 7, 2012 at 1:19 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Strange, Romney’s Mormon family not polygamist BUT Obama’s father was polygamist. I didn’t realize!
    http://crayfisher.wordpress.co...../#comments

    April 20, 2012 at 12:57 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Sounders, Seattle’s women’s soccer team, draws large enthusiastic crowd in first exhibition game
    http://seattletimes.nwsource.c.....ers10.html

    April 11, 2012 at 4:39 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    If the Dems and Reps don’t start talking REAL women’s issues soon, I may have found my write in candidate!
    http://shine.yahoo.com/work-mo.....00637.html

    April 6, 2012 at 1:18 pm

Join the Conversation
The New Agenda is an organization devoted to improving the lives of women and girls.
Join our National Movement –
  • We Get Results
  • Become a Member
  • Get Email Alerts
  • Volunteer With Us

BUILD your NETWORK

The Mentor Exchange

Our Network of College Women

The New Agenda on Campus

Protecting our Teenage Girls

The New Agenda Foundation

We’re in the Media »

Click to see our latest stories in the media

More Stories »

    Recent Comments

    • marille: What's The Problem With The National Women's History Museum?
    • Linda Denny: What's The Problem With The National Women's History Museum?
    • RevAmyinSC: The "XX" Factor in the GOP Vice Presidential Selection
    • RevAmyinSC: What's The Problem With The National Women's History Museum?
    • MaryL: Wrong head is rolling at Yahoo
    • Bes: The "XX" Factor in the GOP Vice Presidential Selection

    The Latest from our Blog

    • 12 Telling Stats on Female MBAs
    • WSJ Moderator Squelches Suzy Welch
    • Wrong head is rolling at Yahoo
    • Happy Mother’s Day!!!
    • The “XX” Factor in the GOP Vice Presidential Selection

    Archives

    Pioneer Mentors

    • Gretchen Carlson
    • Claudia Poccia
    • Jacki Zehner

    Blogroll

    • 20-first
    • Afrocity
    • Amazing Women Rock
    • Catalyst
    • Elect Women Magazine
    • Equal Writes
    • FemaleScienceProfessor
    • Femisex
    • Hardy Girls Healthy Women
    • Jack & Jill Politics
    • Jenn Q. Public
    • Katalusis
    • MADE
    • Marinagraphy
    • Me and My 1000 Girlfriends, That's Who
    • MomsRising
    • One In Three Women
    • Smart Girl Nation
    • Still4Hill
    • Stray Yellar Dawg
    • Taylor Marsh
    • Tennessee Guerilla Women
    • TexasDarlin
    • The Confluence
    • The Red Pump Project
    • The Stiletto
    • The Vyne
    • United For Equality
    • Uppity Woman
    • What About Our Daughters
    • Women and Hollywood
    • WOMENomics

Find us Online

  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Flickr

Subscribe Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS)

The New Agenda is a 501(c)(4) organization dedicated to improving the lives of women and girls by bringing about systemic change in the media, at the workplace, at school and at home. More...

  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • Board of Directors
    • Welcome
    • FAQ’s
  • Media
    • Print & Internet
    • TV & Radio
    • Press Releases
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Get Involved
    • Email Alerts
    • We Spoke Out!
    • Volunteer
  • Features
  • Blog
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
    • TNA Store
  • Contact Us