Another Women’s Healthcare Smackdown: What To Do
December 21, 2009
by Amy Siskind
|This article also appears at the Huffington Post.
When Sen. Ben Nelson’s (D-Neb.) abortion language was added to the Senate health care bill, a Republican member of my organization sent me this email: “Don’t blame us. It’s your party and president that started this mess.”
Is it me, or is Obama’s health care bill increasingly like the movie Groundhog Day? Another day, another women’s health smackdown.
Ladies, we are a bargaining chip – and apparently, not a very big one. Women’s health is under assault. Mammograms, pap smears, the Stupak Amendment and the Nelson language are all part of the wake up call of our generation.
As 2009 draws to a close, women stand at a crossroad of possibility. In 2009, women made significant strides in combating overt sexism and, at long last, elected a woman candidate because of, not despite, her gender. Yet, if women don’t wake up and restructure our activism, the basic privileges and liberties that we have all taken for granted for several decades could well be fleeting.
The good news – women have the power to effectuate change. After the 2008 misogyny-fest, we said “no more” to overt sexism. As a result, 2009 might well be dubbed The Year of the Apology. Chris Matthews apologized on behalf of Dick Armey for Armey’s comment to Joan Walsh. Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) apologized for calling Fed Adviser Linda Robertson a “K Street Whore.” Letterman apologized (twice) for his “jokes” about Governor Palin’s teenage daughter. Heck, even Chris Brown apologized for almost strangling Rihanna to death.
Women also flexed their muscles this year up in Massachusetts where Martha Coakley won a landslide victory in the state’s primary election for Ted Kennedy’s vacant senate seat. Yes, Coakley is poised to become that state’s first female senator. Yes, Coakley would become our country’s 18th woman senator (a record). But the most compelling takeaway is this: Martha won because of, not despite, her gender. Coakley’s campaign was successfully able to harness the support of women and women’s organizations from around the country.
If our country and women were ready in 2008, we could have used the Coakley template to elect our first woman president. And yes, in the last few months we’ve heard a fair amount of “I told you so’s” from Hillary Clinton supporters. But as we embark on 2010, it’s time to put that aside and move forward. In 2010, women need to unite and work to get more women in leadership roles.
Why the call to action? I’ll sum it up in one word: Mammogram. The new mammogram guidelines came from a government agency in Obama’s Democratic Administration. Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson had actually rebuked a similar recommendation in 2002 under the W. Bush Administration. That the mammogram recommendations were even made public is emblematic of the weakened state of women’s bargaining power.
Our saving grace would be our women leaders — of both parties. Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) and Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) co-sponsored an amendment to the Senate’s health-care bill. Meanwhile, other women leaders, including Senate candidate Carly Fiorina (R-Calif.) and Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), have also spoken out on behalf of women. If not for this bipartisan effort on the part of our women leaders, women in their 40s would have become the first target of health care rationing.
And the battle is only beginning. Rationing pap smears has also been mentioned.
Question: How is it possible that our country could considering cutting back preventative screenings for breast cancer and cervical cancer; yet not a word about taxpayer funding of Viagra? How can this be?
The Nelson language is just another notch. And whether or not you are pro-choice, here’s again the takeaway: All aspects of women’s health are under assault. Who knows what will be rationed or taken away next?
In 2010, we must elect more women into positions of power. And, we need to reformulate the old game plan of only focusing on Democratic women. It’s a losing strategy. In 2009, we learned that we cannot count on the Democratic Party to stand up for women. We can, however, count on women politicians to stand up for women.
For here’s the other aspect: We cannot control the political climate around us. Four of the 10 most vulnerable Senate seats in 2010 are held by Democratic women: Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.), Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), and Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.). We need to cultivate and finance women from all parties. We need strong candidates for every political headwind and tailwind.
And, yes, we can do this. Our progress in 2009 shows that when women unite around an issue, we will prevail. We said “no more” to the misogynyfest of 2008 and we prevailed. We said “yes” to making history in Massachusetts and achieved that too. In 2010, we must roll up our sleeves – women of all ages – and work to get more women into positions of leadership. Simply put: Our health and well being depends on it.
[...] the whole story here: Amy Siskind aggregated by [...]
Excellent insights here….Obama was supposed to be the “transformative president” for women’s issues. But he’s become a major player in the “misogynyfest of (not only) 2008″ but in the crucial healthcare debate which has left American women hurt, battered and punched where it really makes a different: their bodies. So, Obama is a woman-batterer and it seems he knew that he had no principles to begin with. The Senate kicked out a bunch of mostly female Single-payer system advocates and treated them like garbage. Now, Barack has battered and bruised badly women once again! This vain, narcissistic teleprompter-for-President is the worst president in history insofar as a principled stand for women’s health is concerned. Shame! Going to bed begging with Sen. Nelson was the final straw….
For the whole Summer he stayed away from the public, refusing to communicate, explain to the people WHAT his own vision of healthcare should be. Surely, he could have put to work his overpraised “communications skills”. The Supreme Communicator chickened out of the Debate, dropped the ball, and allowed the opposition and the uninformed public to run off to tea parties! Well, this one-term Carter and Bush II guy is not holding much promise for women’s health unless they wear the hijab, which he vigorously defended in Cairo….Sharia Law next….
Concerning Boxer, there is a female alternative running against her, Carly Fiorina.Carly is the only announced candidate running on the GOP side.So while Boxer is perhaps vulnerable( not a given) it is not correct that as a result of her possible defeat ,there would be a loss of a seat held by a woman. This is one unique( but which will become more commonplace as more women are elected) situation where women are running against one another.
I don’t really agree that we prevailed. I also don’t agree that there was a real general awakening of any kind. But I do think that we are slowly gathering a base and we are making small ripples that will hopefully become tidal waves that destroy the patriarchy once and for all.
[...] The New Agenda » Blog Archive » Another Women's Healthcare … [...]
I don’t know. It looks like conservatives are getting ready to challenge the legality of the health care bill: that mandates everyone buy it. The bill is Patriarchy established, and its so sleazy and sneaky. First of all, I live in a country that cannot mandate something that makes an unequal burden, and this health insurance scam creates an unequal burden for women, by not covering their reproductive health completely, and forcing single parents (most of whom are women) to pay for health insurance for their dependents until age 27, as a federal mandate. I’m sorry but I live in America, and the federal government cannot mandate that I buy something. I won’t buy it. I suggest all women not buy it.
If I work, I pay income tax. If I buy something I pay state regulated taxes. I don’t have a right to drive. If I want to drive, at times I need to buy state regulated insurance. But I have a right to life, a basic constitutional right to life, and I don’t need to buy health insurance. It’s unconstitutional.
While I appreciate Amy’s thoughts about needing more women in leadership, it’s become clear to me in the past few days, as I watched Senators Patty Murray of Washington and Barbara Boxer of California go along with the other Democrats to allow gender discrimination against women in healthcare and MANDATING uninsured women to purchase policies that discriminate against them on the basis of someone ELSE’s religious beliefs about abortion. 87% of private insurance policies have paid for abortion — THAT is the status quo, not Hyde. Our hope for action should not solely rely on others, i.e. electing others, even women. Action also needs to rely on US, you and me. Contact your local NOW or Planned Parenthood to coordinate or simply gather up some of your like-minded friends and get down to your Senator’s local office and PICKET them. Call the local newspaper and let them know when you’ll be there. And when you are asked why you’re making such a fuss about “a single issue like abortion”, say you’re not making a fuss about abortion, you’re demanding equal rights under the law. The uninsured are at least 51% women (if not more), and why should women be forced to PAY for health insurance that discriminates against a procedure that only pertains to women? If Ben Nelson wants to make his vote about “choice” then fine, but then give WOMEN the “choice” to say NO to buying health insurance that discriminates against them on the basis of someone else’s religious beliefs. We can’t let them have it both ways, folks. Plain and simple.
[...] The New Agenda » Blog Archive » Another Women's Healthcare … [...]
Leave your Response Want an avatar? Get a gravatar!
Community Room
February 6, 2012 at 4:25 pm
January 30, 2012 at 2:36 pm
January 26, 2012 at 4:38 pm
January 23, 2012 at 1:04 pm
January 15, 2012 at 11:37 am
January 9, 2012 at 6:36 pm
January 7, 2012 at 10:10 pm
January 5, 2012 at 9:31 am
BUILD your NETWORK
Our Network of College Women
Protecting our Teenage Girls
We’re in the Media »
Click to see our latest stories in the media
More Stories »Recent Comments
The Latest from our Blog
Archives
Pioneer Mentors
Blogroll
Find us Online
Subscribe Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS)
The New Agenda is a 501(c)(4) organization dedicated to improving the lives of women and girls by bringing about systemic change in the media, at the workplace, at school and at home. More...