<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Palin &#8220;Hate Affair&#8221; Will Backfire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/16/why-the-palin-hate-affair-will-backfire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/16/why-the-palin-hate-affair-will-backfire/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 01:31:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenniferintexas</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/16/why-the-palin-hate-affair-will-backfire/#comment-60021</link>
		<dc:creator>jenniferintexas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15789#comment-60021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Modern Feminist,

Is that like a smart Obot?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern Feminist,</p>
<p>Is that like a smart Obot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/16/why-the-palin-hate-affair-will-backfire/#comment-60020</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15789#comment-60020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The left is trying to cover their fear of Palin with ridicule, but is so breathless that it only reflects how Palin has actually captivated them. 

Yes, captivated them.  They can&#039;t stop thinking about her. 

I can only wonder what women like Katrina vanden Heuvel think when they sign on to a book that is designed to mock Palin (Going Rouge).  Is this what is means to be a good obedient progressive?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The left is trying to cover their fear of Palin with ridicule, but is so breathless that it only reflects how Palin has actually captivated them. </p>
<p>Yes, captivated them.  They can&#8217;t stop thinking about her. </p>
<p>I can only wonder what women like Katrina vanden Heuvel think when they sign on to a book that is designed to mock Palin (Going Rouge).  Is this what is means to be a good obedient progressive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/16/why-the-palin-hate-affair-will-backfire/#comment-60019</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15789#comment-60019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MF, you make one comment to which no one replies, and then take imaginary offense at an equally imaginay storm of disagreement that you thought would head your way that never materialized ... And then accuse everyone ELSE of being over sensitive. Come on.

Also I find it revealing that you claim to disapprove of the sexism directed at Palin while swallowing the whole &quot;intellectual lightweight idiot bimbo&quot; tale whole.  Have you ever investigated her actual beliefs and actions or just listened to the media tear her apart while believing all of it and clucking your tongue disapprovingly?

When you respond to a filthy storm of personal attack like what she&#039;s been subjected to with a tepid &quot;yes but,&quot; it&#039;s like replying to a rape with faux outrage followed by an &quot;innocent&quot; question about what she had been drinking.  You&#039;re looking for an excuse why of&#039;s okay, or at least not worth the outrage of when a &quot;worthy&quot; woman is attacked.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MF, you make one comment to which no one replies, and then take imaginary offense at an equally imaginay storm of disagreement that you thought would head your way that never materialized &#8230; And then accuse everyone ELSE of being over sensitive. Come on.</p>
<p>Also I find it revealing that you claim to disapprove of the sexism directed at Palin while swallowing the whole &#8220;intellectual lightweight idiot bimbo&#8221; tale whole.  Have you ever investigated her actual beliefs and actions or just listened to the media tear her apart while believing all of it and clucking your tongue disapprovingly?</p>
<p>When you respond to a filthy storm of personal attack like what she&#8217;s been subjected to with a tepid &#8220;yes but,&#8221; it&#8217;s like replying to a rape with faux outrage followed by an &#8220;innocent&#8221; question about what she had been drinking.  You&#8217;re looking for an excuse why of&#8217;s okay, or at least not worth the outrage of when a &#8220;worthy&#8221; woman is attacked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loralee</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/16/why-the-palin-hate-affair-will-backfire/#comment-60018</link>
		<dc:creator>Loralee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15789#comment-60018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Modern Feminist, &quot;The Majority of wome don&#039;t support Palin?&quot; Heck the majority of women don&#039;t support any woman. Why else would Hillary Clinton, a more qualified and experienced candidate lose to a lesser man? I wonder if she lost all states that had a caucus format because people are afraid to vote for a woman openly. It was definitely awkward at my caucus. Noone had anything substantial to say as to why they were voting for Obama. It&#039;s a scary thing. That&#039;s the purpose of this site. To make women aware that society has pitted us against each other. To make us Democrats aware that our party has paid a lot of lip service and little action.

I don&#039;t necessarily support Palin but I like her better than I would if I were just listening to mainstream media. Look beyond her personal views on abortion and look at what she has actually done. I have. And so far it seems to me that she is one of the few politicians to have the guts to actually go against her own party and work with the Democrats (until after she was tapped for VP and the Dems got word not to work with her anymore).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern Feminist, &#8220;The Majority of wome don&#8217;t support Palin?&#8221; Heck the majority of women don&#8217;t support any woman. Why else would Hillary Clinton, a more qualified and experienced candidate lose to a lesser man? I wonder if she lost all states that had a caucus format because people are afraid to vote for a woman openly. It was definitely awkward at my caucus. Noone had anything substantial to say as to why they were voting for Obama. It&#8217;s a scary thing. That&#8217;s the purpose of this site. To make women aware that society has pitted us against each other. To make us Democrats aware that our party has paid a lot of lip service and little action.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t necessarily support Palin but I like her better than I would if I were just listening to mainstream media. Look beyond her personal views on abortion and look at what she has actually done. I have. And so far it seems to me that she is one of the few politicians to have the guts to actually go against her own party and work with the Democrats (until after she was tapped for VP and the Dems got word not to work with her anymore).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modern Feminist</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/16/why-the-palin-hate-affair-will-backfire/#comment-60017</link>
		<dc:creator>Modern Feminist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15789#comment-60017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So apparently this site is a &#039;voice for all women&#039;....with the disclaimer that they must agree with your views?

Funny.

If that&#039;s the case, than you really should change the name &quot;a voice for a small minority of women&quot; since the majority of women don&#039;t support Palin.

I DID afterall agree with the author&#039;s premise that Newsweek&#039;s choice of photo was sexist.

Is Sarah, or are you for that matter, so sensitive you can&#039;t face a bit of criticism?  A different female perspective?

That&#039;s not my idea feminine strength.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So apparently this site is a &#8216;voice for all women&#8217;&#8230;.with the disclaimer that they must agree with your views?</p>
<p>Funny.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the case, than you really should change the name &#8220;a voice for a small minority of women&#8221; since the majority of women don&#8217;t support Palin.</p>
<p>I DID afterall agree with the author&#8217;s premise that Newsweek&#8217;s choice of photo was sexist.</p>
<p>Is Sarah, or are you for that matter, so sensitive you can&#8217;t face a bit of criticism?  A different female perspective?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not my idea feminine strength.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/16/why-the-palin-hate-affair-will-backfire/#comment-60016</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15789#comment-60016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Newsweek covered up the Blue Star Sarah had up on the window denoting her son being in Iraq. Trust me, it was intentional.&quot;

I have no doubt it was.  Can you imagine the orgy of vicious, bilious, evil GLEE that will ensue if that poor kid gets hurt over there?

For me, the running shorts weren&#039;t the problem.  She runs.  But why post a leggy, sexy picture of a woman &lt;i&gt;when you want to humiliate her and call her a problem&lt;/I&gt;?

Is punishing women and fucking women the same thing in many men&#039;s minds?  Hell, many &lt;i&gt;women&#039;s&lt;/i&gt; minds?

Rhetorical question.  I already know the answer, and it enrages me.  I keep coming back to it, but all this &quot;pornulation is empoweriffic&quot; garbage that the let-wing has been spewing for the past twenty years is a bunch of horseshit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Newsweek covered up the Blue Star Sarah had up on the window denoting her son being in Iraq. Trust me, it was intentional.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have no doubt it was.  Can you imagine the orgy of vicious, bilious, evil GLEE that will ensue if that poor kid gets hurt over there?</p>
<p>For me, the running shorts weren&#8217;t the problem.  She runs.  But why post a leggy, sexy picture of a woman when you want to humiliate her and call her a problem?</p>
<p>Is punishing women and fucking women the same thing in many men&#8217;s minds?  Hell, many women&#8217;s minds?</p>
<p>Rhetorical question.  I already know the answer, and it enrages me.  I keep coming back to it, but all this &#8220;pornulation is empoweriffic&#8221; garbage that the let-wing has been spewing for the past twenty years is a bunch of horseshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/16/why-the-palin-hate-affair-will-backfire/#comment-60015</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15789#comment-60015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I remember from the musical... didn&#039;t &quot;problem child&quot; Maria turn out the be the exact, perfect answer to what the Von Trapp family needed without knowing it? That she was needed out in the world and among other people instead of following a secluded, isolated vocation? And wasn&#039;t there a high and mighty, cold-hearted opportunistic opponent set to take over the Von Trapp until Maria&#039;s love and energy turned them into a happy family again?

Geez, looks like Newsweek actually hit on the perfect headline. Fuuny when sarcasm backfires!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I remember from the musical&#8230; didn&#8217;t &#8220;problem child&#8221; Maria turn out the be the exact, perfect answer to what the Von Trapp family needed without knowing it? That she was needed out in the world and among other people instead of following a secluded, isolated vocation? And wasn&#8217;t there a high and mighty, cold-hearted opportunistic opponent set to take over the Von Trapp until Maria&#8217;s love and energy turned them into a happy family again?</p>
<p>Geez, looks like Newsweek actually hit on the perfect headline. Fuuny when sarcasm backfires!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shouldvevotedforhillary</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/16/why-the-palin-hate-affair-will-backfire/#comment-60014</link>
		<dc:creator>shouldvevotedforhillary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15789#comment-60014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amy

Bravo! For an excellently put article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy</p>
<p>Bravo! For an excellently put article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/16/why-the-palin-hate-affair-will-backfire/#comment-60012</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15789#comment-60012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little thing I noticed. Newsweek covered up the Blue Star Sarah had up on the window denoting her son being in Iraq. Trust me, it was intentional. They want to diminish her in any way that they can.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little thing I noticed. Newsweek covered up the Blue Star Sarah had up on the window denoting her son being in Iraq. Trust me, it was intentional. They want to diminish her in any way that they can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy in CA</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/16/why-the-palin-hate-affair-will-backfire/#comment-60011</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy in CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15789#comment-60011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Amy!  I completely agree.  Those that &quot;hate&quot; Sarah Palin don&#039;t realize they have empowered her.  How many people can post a Facebook entry and make headlines!  

As for male politicians being on the front cover with running shorts - I think Mike Huckabee has (he is a runner too).  Obama has been featured &quot;shirtless&quot;.  Both, however, were depicted in a postitive light, instead of trying to make fun of them.  The picture of Sarah in her running outfit was so out of context even for their sexist caption, all it did was make Newsweek look bad and lazy (photoshop anyone?).  

I have also been paying attention to some of the op-ed pieces circulating regarding a Palin 2012 run.  While the media is vetting her pretty hard, the current administration keeps digging a hole regarding women.  This could be an interesting next few years!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Amy!  I completely agree.  Those that &#8220;hate&#8221; Sarah Palin don&#8217;t realize they have empowered her.  How many people can post a Facebook entry and make headlines!  </p>
<p>As for male politicians being on the front cover with running shorts &#8211; I think Mike Huckabee has (he is a runner too).  Obama has been featured &#8220;shirtless&#8221;.  Both, however, were depicted in a postitive light, instead of trying to make fun of them.  The picture of Sarah in her running outfit was so out of context even for their sexist caption, all it did was make Newsweek look bad and lazy (photoshop anyone?).  </p>
<p>I have also been paying attention to some of the op-ed pieces circulating regarding a Palin 2012 run.  While the media is vetting her pretty hard, the current administration keeps digging a hole regarding women.  This could be an interesting next few years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
