<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Is Martha Coakley?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/14/who-is-martha-coakley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/14/who-is-martha-coakley/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New Agenda &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Protect Male Ego: Blame the Woman</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/14/who-is-martha-coakley/comment-page-1/#comment-41930</link>
		<dc:creator>The New Agenda &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Protect Male Ego: Blame the Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15642#comment-41930</guid>
		<description>[...] have the support of the Obama administration or the big money Democrats in the primaries and even Pelosi endorsed Capuano. The fact is that politicians are always considered under the light of their party&#8217;s main [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have the support of the Obama administration or the big money Democrats in the primaries and even Pelosi endorsed Capuano. The fact is that politicians are always considered under the light of their party&#8217;s main [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peg</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/14/who-is-martha-coakley/comment-page-1/#comment-36175</link>
		<dc:creator>Peg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15642#comment-36175</guid>
		<description>Coakley is a remarkable woman.  A different kind of politician - she works and earns her accolades.  A woman in a Boston old boys&#039; political world, she was very successful.

I think she will represent Massachusetts and women very well in the US Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coakley is a remarkable woman.  A different kind of politician &#8211; she works and earns her accolades.  A woman in a Boston old boys&#8217; political world, she was very successful.</p>
<p>I think she will represent Massachusetts and women very well in the US Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/14/who-is-martha-coakley/comment-page-1/#comment-32611</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15642#comment-32611</guid>
		<description>Have you all gone crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you all gone crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/14/who-is-martha-coakley/comment-page-1/#comment-31823</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15642#comment-31823</guid>
		<description>I am very impressed by Coakley. She will represent MA well- and the women of the United States. Go Martha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very impressed by Coakley. She will represent MA well- and the women of the United States. Go Martha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loralee</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/14/who-is-martha-coakley/comment-page-1/#comment-31806</link>
		<dc:creator>Loralee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15642#comment-31806</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;ll contribute to her campaign. We NEED these independent thinking women in office!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ll contribute to her campaign. We NEED these independent thinking women in office!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/14/who-is-martha-coakley/comment-page-1/#comment-31769</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 03:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15642#comment-31769</guid>
		<description>*sigh*  Capuano, Pelosi, Pagliuca ... why are my people such political &lt;i&gt;morons&lt;/i&gt; all the time?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh*  Capuano, Pelosi, Pagliuca &#8230; why are my people such political <i>morons</i> all the time?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen H.</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/14/who-is-martha-coakley/comment-page-1/#comment-31766</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 01:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15642#comment-31766</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget that Martha Coakley made news this past week because she had the courage and integrity to publicly state that she wouldn&#039;t have voted for the healthcare bill with the Stupak Amendment (the anti-choice amendment tacked on at the last minute by anti-choice Dems that goes way further than Hyde).  Could that be another reason Pelosi decided to endorse her opponent just a couple of days later?  Her opponent Capuano first ridiculed Coakley for her pro-woman stance, although he has subsequently come around to saying the same thing (after the public furor).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget that Martha Coakley made news this past week because she had the courage and integrity to publicly state that she wouldn&#8217;t have voted for the healthcare bill with the Stupak Amendment (the anti-choice amendment tacked on at the last minute by anti-choice Dems that goes way further than Hyde).  Could that be another reason Pelosi decided to endorse her opponent just a couple of days later?  Her opponent Capuano first ridiculed Coakley for her pro-woman stance, although he has subsequently come around to saying the same thing (after the public furor).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnneE</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/11/14/who-is-martha-coakley/comment-page-1/#comment-31758</link>
		<dc:creator>AnneE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=15642#comment-31758</guid>
		<description>Maybe she is ahead because people are tired of the same old stuff.  Maybe they want a public servant that will act in their interest.  Off topic--Eleanor Clift wrote a column in Newsweek that was titled, &quot;Both Parties Abandon Women&#039;s Rights.&quot;  Yah Think? Now the media has made this discovery, it is fact and we will be hearing about it 24/7 until they latch on to something else that they can breathlessly report and drive their numbers .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe she is ahead because people are tired of the same old stuff.  Maybe they want a public servant that will act in their interest.  Off topic&#8211;Eleanor Clift wrote a column in Newsweek that was titled, &#8220;Both Parties Abandon Women&#8217;s Rights.&#8221;  Yah Think? Now the media has made this discovery, it is fact and we will be hearing about it 24/7 until they latch on to something else that they can breathlessly report and drive their numbers .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

