DAILY BEAST: How Obama Sold Women Out
November 10, 2009
by The New Agenda
|The following article is an op-ed written by The New Agenda’s Amy Siskind at The Daily Beast. The article may be found in its entirety here.
We knew it would end eventually. Just like a Hollywood romance, great love affairs just don’t seem to stand the test of time. As the Obama administration began, we were gleefully informed by a leading lady feminist that President Obama was Christmas and Hannukah and New Years all rolled into one when it came to women’s issues. Turns out, it’s a bit more like April Fools.
For the millions of women who voted for Obama on his promise to protect their reproductive rights, this past weekend’s whipsaw on abortion funding is just the latest example of a president who frankly could care less about women beyond their votes. Ladies, we were sold a political brand name that touted diversity. But we were delivered a president with a woman problem. Now it’s time to do something about it.
Women’s love affair with Obama started in 2007. Some loved the idea of him—while not questioning his ideas. So when some women leaders heard the candidate say things like “sweetie” or “you’re likable enough,” or saw Obama’s speechwriter Jon Favreau groping the breast of a cardboard cutout of Hillary Clinton on Facebook (no comment), these leaders ignored the signs of subtle misogyny. The National Organization for Women (under its former leader) endorsed its first all-male ticket. And NARAL endorsed Obama over Sen. Clinton, even though she had a proven track record on reproductive rights. In January 2009, Ms. Magazine’s cover featured a now-infamous image of Obama in a superman pose sporting a t-shirt that reads: This is What a Feminist Looks Like.
With these women leaders behind him, President Obama felt he could be himself. He appointed fewer women into his cabinet than President Bill Clinton. He surrounded himself with czars, more than 90% of whom are male. He appointed Larry Summers, of “girls are inferior in math and science” fame, to a key economic post. He played basketball, golfed and fished with men and men only. He had beers with Skip Gates, but ignored it when Rihanna was almost strangled to death. And so on.
The love affair started to fade with Obama’s off-handed response during an MSNBC interview questioning his all-male outings: “I think this is bunk.” That remark gave women a reason to take a closer look at the inner workings of Obama and his ideas. And just as Betty Friedan described the subtlety of sexism as “the problem that has no name,” “bunk” revealed that the boys club was still alive and well at the White House.
And then came the Stupak Amendment. There were signs that Obama was agnostic on choice, but this sealed the deal. Analyst Taylor Marsh sums it up most eloquently: “It was Pres. Obama who opened the door to sell us out when he decided to put the Hyde Amendment in the budget, something Bill Clinton never did. But Mr. Obama didn’t stop there. During the stimulus fight, at the first sign of displeasure, our president personally asked that contraceptives be taken out. Now the president seems ready to finish the job, with Democrats in the House helping him do it.”
But did women let this pass? Not this time. The sleeping giant—America’s majority constituency—is awakening. Note how few men are speaking out about the fact that a major issue for women was thrown under the bus to get a deal done: That women were not valued. It is the women leaders doing the talking and the typing.
Women’s organization such as Emily’s List, NOW, Planned Parenthood and The New Agenda spoke out—each with its own message and solutions—loud and clear. Women on Capitol Hill, led by vocal heroines like Rep. Diana DeGette of Colorado and Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, built a coalition unwilling to sign a bill including the Stupak Amendment. Passionate women advocates such as Phyllis Chesler and Jane Hamsher among countless others penned their displeasure.
And it stuck. By midday Monday, the story line in the media had shifted from the public option to abortion funding. And just as women’s love affair with Obama came careening to a end, the president noticed—and very publicly tried to distance himself from what went down over at Pelosi’s house. In an act of pure politics, Obama chose to equivocate.
What lessons have we learned?
Lesson one—we need more women in leadership roles. Women’s organizations need to drop partisanship and work together to get more women into public office for both parties. Sisters, we cannot count on either party to represent our interests; we can only count on ourselves. (And when our women leaders do, on occasion, get it wrong—as Speaker Pelosi did this past weekend—we need an ample bench of women politicians surrounding her, and strong advocacy groups to steer her right).
Lesson two—with this awakening, there will be a quest to get a woman into the White House in 2012. Find us a woman leader who might have her personal beliefs, but will agree to keep them as just that, and you might just have a deal!
I’ve said it before, the Democratic Party took the Frederick Douglas approach to women and the presidency. When women were trying to gain the vote, Douglas stated that if it came down to black men getting the vote, or women getting the vote, black men should go first. So it looks like we are still expected to sit on the back of everyone’s bus. That’s what my former party did to me, I am not sure if the Republican party has been just as dimsive of its women.
As far as Nancy Pelosi goes, the only thing that she has done since becoming Speaker is her hair and cow-towing to the boys club. She is a “queen bee” and wants to be the only girl in the boys club. She was less than supportive than of Clinton.
I admit it, I am still smarting from the way women were treated in the last election. Having grown up in the age of feminism, I believed that if I was a good little girl, worked hard and got a graduate degree I would be considered human. But things have not changed, in some senses they have gotten worse.
Would it have been worse if McCain had been elected? I suspect not. In fact, I suspect it would have been better. People would be in the streets protesting the war. Women would be marching, outraged over the loss of their rights.
Instead what we have is a bunch of complacent people rolling over at best, at worse, actively cheering on the war, the loss of women’s rights, some how convinced these things are okay because they are being done for the greater good.
yttik, I agree totally. I’m seeing some dumb women walking around effectively going, “At least the Democrats have ripped our rights out of our hands and stomped them flat! The Republicans wouldn’t even have done THAT much!”
This is a VERY GOOD article! I think we can even take it a bit further, in that the Stupak Amendment really amounts to control of women. The Pro-choice movement ralied around the issue that government cannot control what women want (or need) to do. In many ways, the Stupak Amendment is not a pro-life issue, it is a control issue. Women will not be allowed to contract with an insurance company for based upon coverage they want. By even allowing the Stupak Amendment to be discussed and passed, it paves the way for the government to dictate the insurance coverage for all health insurance, not just a public option. And the insurance industry will follow happily, because the financial industry has all ready been bought and paid for.
Amy I really admire you writing these articles for general liberal consumption. I do go and read the comments you get on them and they are mostly so blinded by their liberal ideology it is stunning. I did register to comment on Huff Puff but then decided they are such a bunch of misogynist liberal twits it isn’t worth my time. Still there is a possibility that if they have to listen to a pro woman viewpoint as opposed to a “feminist” viewpoint they might be swayed.
Anne E: I agree for women things have gotten far worse in this country and Democrats have led the way. How and when did the Democrats manage to domesticate the “feminists”? The good news is the “feminists” aren’t leading anyone any longer, they are just a bunch of fringe groups who talk to themselves about themselves.
Thank you, Amy, for your tireless advocacy for us all!
Regarding Healthcare issues, check out the National Women’s Law Center:
Their website is here: https://www.nwlc.org/reformmatters/
How your Congressperson sold women out:
Here’s a list, by state, that will tell you if your Representative voted to take away abortion coverage from women.
http://salsa.wiredforchange.co.....t_KEY=3000
Contact information is also provided in the list.
Leave your Response Want an avatar? Get a gravatar!
Community Room
February 6, 2012 at 4:25 pm
January 30, 2012 at 2:36 pm
January 26, 2012 at 4:38 pm
January 23, 2012 at 1:04 pm
January 15, 2012 at 11:37 am
January 9, 2012 at 6:36 pm
January 7, 2012 at 10:10 pm
January 5, 2012 at 9:31 am
BUILD your NETWORK
Our Network of College Women
Protecting our Teenage Girls
We’re in the Media »
Click to see our latest stories in the media
More Stories »Recent Comments
The Latest from our Blog
Archives
Pioneer Mentors
Blogroll
Find us Online
Subscribe Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS)
The New Agenda is a 501(c)(4) organization dedicated to improving the lives of women and girls by bringing about systemic change in the media, at the workplace, at school and at home. More...