The New Agenda - a voice for all women
Become a Member | Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • Board and Officers
    • Advisory Council
    • Young Women Leadership Council
    • FAQ's
    • We Get Results!
    • Contact Us
  • Media
    • Print & Internet
    • TV & Radio
    • Press Releases
  • Get Involved
    • Take Action!
    • Get Email Alerts
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
  • Features
  • Blog
Home » Health & Fitness, Sexism

Second Base: Funny Objectifying, or Too Complex for Categories?

May 12, 2009

by Judy SilvercloseAuthor: Judy Silver Name: Judy Silver
Email: blog@thenewagenda.net
Site:
About: See Authors Posts (49)

|
15 Comments
  • Email
  • Share
  • Tweet

secondbase21“Save Second Base” by donating to breast cancer research – get it? It’s a promotional tag line that fund raisers have used for several years without controversy. However this year, when a Princeton student group made posters that added: “Gentlemen: Save Second Base,” controversy erupted. A counter-campaign posted slogans like “Ladies: Save the Male G-Spot – support prostate cancer research,” and “Gentlemen: Save Tittyfucking.”  Chloe Angyal’s Diary explains the counter-campaign’s ire:

Women are not their breasts. Presenting breast cancer research as an effort to save women’s breasts, rather than their lives, reduces women to their mammary glands. …This becomes particularly problematic for women who have survived breast cancer by having one or both breasts removed… Surely we underestimate men if we believe that the only way to get them to care about women’s health is by striking into their hearts the fear of a dwindling supply of boobies…We care about prostate cancer because it’s cancer, and it’s deadly, not because it attacks the male sexual organs. We care about men’s lives, and no one’s trying to sell prostate cancer research by warning women and gay men that prostate cancer will make certain sexual acts impossible.

The event organizers, writing in the Daily Princetonian, counter:

We chose the slogan “Save Second Base” with the intent to appeal directly to college students and especially to students (particularly males) who wouldn’t relate to the prim, girly pink ribbons and rhinestones that often correspond with breast cancer fundraisers. …The slogan was meant to be lighthearted and fun; in fact, many breast cancer survivors have advocated using this slogan as a way to humorously raise awareness and funds.

secondbaseprotest1Posting on the Equal Writes blog, Nick Cox goes further:

The feminist who gets offended by the misogynies that she sees everywhere is putting herself in the position of the victim, and expecting those in power to take pity on her. In that moment she throws away all she has been working for. The next generation of feminists may find it makes the most sense to cultivate not indignation but indifference… I, for one, thought the “Save Second Base” slogan was very funny. It was a clever way to illustrate the tangible effects of a disease that sometimes tends to ossify into a stock phrase whose utterance brings to mind little more than a folded pink ribbon. I did not find it the least bit offensive, and I really don’t think the shitstorm it generated was at all merited.


On the same blog, Josh Franklin takes a more nuanced approach:

I feel that we ought to discuss this state of affairs, one that seems far too common, where feminists’ legitimate criticisms of gender phenomena are met with the frustrating evasion, “can’t you take a joke?” …What I want to advocate for here is a discourse on gender issues that moves beyond emotion-laden categories of “funny” and “offensive”. I don’t know how, but I want to try to think about a way of speaking about gender and sexuality and oppression with more subtlety (because I love subtlety), but more importantly, with more compassion, especially for women like the beneficiaries of the [fundraiser].

Readers, what do you think? Is “Save Second Base” funny or offensive or both? Is it acceptable to trade-off objectification for saving women’s lives? Or do we need non-categorical ways of discussing these issues?

15 Comments » Want an avatar? Get a gravatar!

  • goesh said:

    - here we go, Nick and Josh, two men, telling women how to think, act and feel, yet again, men thinking it is their purview to entirely define women. Men put their hands on baseballs and the point made in this Post is 100% accurate – save a woman from breast cancer and you save the objects of sexual gratification.

    Nick thinks it’s funny. Hey Nick, how about this one – “Ladies: prevent your mate’s penis from getting even smaller, support prostate cancer research” Tit for tat, Nick, or should I say, teat for a tiny bit…??

    May 12, 2009 at 7:52 am
  • Shakti said:

    I agree Goesh! I appreciate men being welcomed to the new agenda but I am really tired of men telling me how to be a woman.

    May 12, 2009 at 10:17 am
  • Denise C said:

    I consider myself extremely sensitive to media’s portrayal of women. But I don’t have an issue with save second base. Yes, we should all care about breast cancer because it saves lives – BUT – good marketing is eye catching and memorable and this is definitely both. I don’t think it objectifies women or trivializes the deadliness of cancer – I do think that we shouldn’t be afraid to be lighthearted about serious issues.

    May 12, 2009 at 11:01 am
  • goesh said:

    Those baseballs are made for grabbing, ain’t they? That is the sole intent of this 2cd base gambit , getting breasts and baseballs in one motion , attaining 2cd base, making the human life secondary – in my opinion, very akin to adolscent males dropping an object in front of a seated girl so they can look up her skirt in the process.

    May 12, 2009 at 12:40 pm
  • Bes said:

    I saw a second base Tshirt on one of the students at work. I just thought it was silly and never realized what point it was trying to make. Why do men need to approve of a breast cancer publicity campaigns? Few men get breast cancer. I have seen some tit and ass advertising style breast cancer announcements in previous years that also struck me as off.

    May 12, 2009 at 12:53 pm
  • lahana said:

    I don’t have a problem with the phrase. I do have a problem with putting two baseballs over the breasts as if they were pasties.

    May 12, 2009 at 1:01 pm
  • Florida Lady said:

    I am glad attention is paid to this but wish, somehow, to be shielded from men who insist that *they* are ‘not offended’ by a sexist remark or tee-shirt.
    No shoot – you’re the audience. It was targeting you. Your issues, your sensibility, your body is not the butt of the joke. It never is.
    Since when do we women care if men are offended by sexism? This is like those cable news pigs who indignantly insisted that Hillary was not singled out with sexist treatment but merely entangled in the sharp elbows of big politics.
    Yet the aura of “we can’t even appear racist and will just smile and nod” enveloped The One – to his benefit.
    Women who don’t agree with men’s sexist evaluation of women’s concerns are humorless drudges who need to ‘get a life.’
    But anyone who disagrees with The One or his enforcers, men to a person, are bigots if they make a peep of anything but enthusiastic praise.
    It is all so exhausting.

    May 12, 2009 at 2:18 pm
  • Adrienne in CA said:

    I’d be interested in knowing what tangible impact “Save Second Base” (I’ve also seen “Save The Ta-Tas”) t-shirts actually have on breast cancer donations (versus “awareness” which amounts to … what exactly?). The website says they’ve donated $30,000 since 2006 to the Kelly Rooney Foundation and other cancer non-profits. Not that huge a sum. I can’t see any good that would come of decrying this effort to honor a dead sister/friend.

    We must concentrate on solving the root problem: too few women in positions of leadership. It’s understandable that breast cancer campaigns might expect to benefit from slogans that appeal to men, since men dominate the power and money ranks that decide what gets funded and what doesn’t. Men also dominate the media opinion ranks that comment on controversies of this sort, so that if individual women or even women’s groups complain, they can be made to seem petty for rejecting ostensible support. Catch-22.

    *****A

    May 12, 2009 at 9:49 pm
  • Carrie said:

    I do find it offensive, and I’m also sick of men telling women what they should or shouldn’t find offensive. I do appreciate thoughtful comments from men about situations, though, as long as they acknowledge that there are some things about being women that they cannot understand (although they can, and should, try to).

    May 13, 2009 at 12:32 am
  • goesh said:

    I wonder what men who have lost a loved one to breast cancer think of this Ad? Pssst! Hey mister! Your wife died of breast cancer, so like, ah, tell me, do you think putting baseballs on women’s breasts like helps promote awareness of breast cancer? I mean like do you think baseballs on breasts could have maybe saved her life??

    May 13, 2009 at 2:56 am
  • samanthasmom said:

    When a woman has breast cancer, it’s not just “second base” that needs to be saved. The whole ball field is at stake. It’s not that I can’t appreciate having a sense of humor. When my son was undergoing treatment for cancer, he and his friends from the hospital wore “I’m having a no-hair day” tee shirts all of the time. However, I think that these baseball tee shirts send a message that it’s a woman’s breasts that need to be saved when it fact it’s her whole life.

    May 13, 2009 at 11:36 am
  • Janis said:

    Maybe I can punch that guy in the face and then blame him for taking on a victim mentality when his eyes bruise.

    May 13, 2009 at 11:47 am
  • RealChange said:

    This is NOT good marketing. Of course it’s offensive. It is gratuitous use of women’s sexuality to get the attention of men and women who are anxious to please men. This is bottom denominator marketing, just like the marketing that was used to promote and then elect Barack Obama. So many times I heard…Oh, he ran a better campaign, he played the game better…to which my response was, so now we reward those who can lie, cheat and steal the best and call that “good” campaigning, “good” marketing? Heaven help us. This ’2nd base” campaign to draw attention to breast cancer is that same kind of sleazy marketing.

    May 13, 2009 at 10:29 pm
  • A-Nell said:

    This is like using a cartoon to “raise awareness.” All it does is distract from the real issues of life and death as well as aesthetics if the woman survives. Both are important but not for jokes. Just as it leaves a bad taste if anyone makes a joke about 9-11. Humor, yes, but not sexist humor.

    May 13, 2009 at 11:16 pm
  • Florida Lady said:

    to real change @10:29 – you are so right!
    true that…

    May 14, 2009 at 11:20 pm

Leave your Response Want an avatar? Get a gravatar!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Community Room

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Comcast launches minority owned channels to comply with government regulation. Where are the woman controlled channels? http://thehill.com/blogs/hilli.....ommitments

    February 22, 2012 at 11:22 am

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Report on the status of women in the US media. And remember that US media is exported all over the world. http://wmc.3cdn.net/a6b2dc282c.....6b0hk8.pdf

    February 17, 2012 at 2:39 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Mexico’s ruling party picks a woman as presidential candidate. Josefina Vazquez Mota, 51 http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/06/.....?hpt=hp_t3

    February 6, 2012 at 4:25 pm

  • 1
    Respond
    Bes

    Washington State has an effective Reproductive rights group who proposes legislation at the STATE LEVEL.
    Reproductive Parity Act. http://www.prochoicewashington.org/

    January 30, 2012 at 2:36 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Report sheds light on the ways in which the media profits from elections while polluting political discourse and failing to cover issues. http://www.freepress.net/press.....1&t=3

    January 26, 2012 at 4:38 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Two studies show Media sexism in 2008 was responsible for Hillary being pushed from the race. Democrats allowed the situation. http://www.usnews.com/news/blo.....s-2008-bid

    January 23, 2012 at 1:04 pm

  • 0
    Respond
    BevWKY

    Interesting comparisons to the 2008 campaigns:
    http://conservatives4palin.com.....d-one.html

    January 15, 2012 at 11:37 am

  • 0
    Respond
    Bes

    Washington State introduces legislation requiring all insurance sold in state which covers maternity to cover abortion http://blog.seattlepi.com/seat.....insurance/

    January 9, 2012 at 6:36 pm

Join the Conversation
The New Agenda is an organization devoted to improving the lives of women and girls.
Join our National Movement –
  • We Get Results
  • Become a Member
  • Get Email Alerts
  • Volunteer With Us

BUILD your NETWORK

The Mentor Exchange

Our Network of College Women

The New Agenda on Campus

Protecting our Teenage Girls

The New Agenda Foundation

We’re in the Media »

Click to see our latest stories in the media

More Stories »

    Recent Comments

    • Bes: Hey, PETA--Don't Women Deserve as Much Respect as Animals?
    • ryan: Hey, PETA--Don't Women Deserve as Much Respect as Animals?
    • ryan: Hey, PETA--Don't Women Deserve as Much Respect as Animals?
    • Bes: Community Room
    • Bes: Hey, PETA--Don't Women Deserve as Much Respect as Animals?
    • Allison: Hey, PETA--Don't Women Deserve as Much Respect as Animals?

    The Latest from our Blog

    • Hey, PETA–Don’t Women Deserve as Much Respect as Animals?
    • The Local Mom Effect
    • Every Issue is a Women’s Issue
    • Mary Rogan on Whitney Houston: A former addict’s perspective on a singer’s ruined life
    • Is It 2012 or 1812?

    Archives

    Pioneer Mentors

    • Gretchen Carlson
    • Claudia Poccia
    • Jacki Zehner

    Blogroll

    • 20-first
    • Afrocity
    • Amazing Women Rock
    • Catalyst
    • Elect Women Magazine
    • Equal Writes
    • FemaleScienceProfessor
    • Femisex
    • Hardy Girls Healthy Women
    • Jack & Jill Politics
    • Jenn Q. Public
    • Katalusis
    • MADE
    • Marinagraphy
    • Me and My 1000 Girlfriends, That's Who
    • MomsRising
    • One In Three Women
    • Smart Girl Nation
    • Still4Hill
    • Stray Yellar Dawg
    • Taylor Marsh
    • Tennessee Guerilla Women
    • TexasDarlin
    • The Confluence
    • The Red Pump Project
    • The Stiletto
    • The Vyne
    • United For Equality
    • Uppity Woman
    • What About Our Daughters
    • Women and Hollywood
    • WOMENomics

Find us Online

  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Flickr

Subscribe Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS)

The New Agenda is a 501(c)(4) organization dedicated to improving the lives of women and girls by bringing about systemic change in the media, at the workplace, at school and at home. More...

  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Mission & Goals
    • Board of Directors
    • Welcome
    • FAQ’s
  • Media
    • Print & Internet
    • TV & Radio
    • Press Releases
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
    • Get Involved
    • Email Alerts
    • We Spoke Out!
    • Volunteer
  • Features
  • Blog
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
    • TNA Store
  • Contact Us