<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Messenger Wore a Skirt&#8221;*</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/04/16/the-messenger-wore-a-skirt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/04/16/the-messenger-wore-a-skirt/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: run75441 (Bill H)</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/04/16/the-messenger-wore-a-skirt/comment-page-1/#comment-14412</link>
		<dc:creator>run75441 (Bill H)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=8447#comment-14412</guid>
		<description>ER:

I had read the &quot;Shleifer&quot; debacle while gathering information on Born, Mack, and Dorgan. My mini-article was getting too long as it was and few people will read beyond two paragraphs in this modern internet and acronymically text messaging world. 

Favoritism is the modus operandi of Washington DC. It is no mistake that Paulson, Bernanke, Geithner, Summers, Greenspan, etc.,  the very ones who have led us to today&#039;s bailout, hail from W$ the place responsible for the present economic crisis requiring a bailout. Breaking that norm is close to impossible. 

Obama is a University of Chicago Democrat and has hobnobbed with &quot;freshwater&quot; economists who are centered there and the likes of which would include Milton Friedman, Lucas, Cochrane, etc. I suspect he was influenced by them. While Summers and Geithner are &quot;saltwater&quot; influenced, all appear to have that tie to W$. I was never a fan of Summers and had written Obama a letter suggesting there were better candidates who were not prejudiced to be had. Instead, we got &quot;Timmie.&quot; 

Thank you for your reply and the additional articles to review. I will add them to my knowledge base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ER:</p>
<p>I had read the &#8220;Shleifer&#8221; debacle while gathering information on Born, Mack, and Dorgan. My mini-article was getting too long as it was and few people will read beyond two paragraphs in this modern internet and acronymically text messaging world. </p>
<p>Favoritism is the modus operandi of Washington DC. It is no mistake that Paulson, Bernanke, Geithner, Summers, Greenspan, etc.,  the very ones who have led us to today&#8217;s bailout, hail from W$ the place responsible for the present economic crisis requiring a bailout. Breaking that norm is close to impossible. </p>
<p>Obama is a University of Chicago Democrat and has hobnobbed with &#8220;freshwater&#8221; economists who are centered there and the likes of which would include Milton Friedman, Lucas, Cochrane, etc. I suspect he was influenced by them. While Summers and Geithner are &#8220;saltwater&#8221; influenced, all appear to have that tie to W$. I was never a fan of Summers and had written Obama a letter suggesting there were better candidates who were not prejudiced to be had. Instead, we got &#8220;Timmie.&#8221; </p>
<p>Thank you for your reply and the additional articles to review. I will add them to my knowledge base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/04/16/the-messenger-wore-a-skirt/comment-page-1/#comment-14404</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=8447#comment-14404</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Bill H, for your article.  I hope you will post it far and wide across the media, and that you will send a copy to President Obama.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;” Personality, ego, and a blind belief in the ability of the market place to dictate the proper path and the correction has gotten in front of common sense. Maybe it is time to sideline Summers and his protégé Geithner in favor of Born, Mack, and Dorgan. Each has shown more foresight into how today’s problems and issues were created and how to resolve them.”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; time to sideline Summers.  His advice has clearly led us down the path to financial crisis.  Here’s another Summers’ caper:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Andrei Shleifer, a close friend of Summers cost Harvard a $26 million settlement with the U.S. government. A federal court found Shleifer liable for conspiracy to defraud the U.S. Government, after Shleifer violated conflict-of-interest rules by making secret investments in Russia at the same time he was working for a Harvard group contracted by the U.S. Government to advise the Russian government. While Shleifer was being investigated, Summers pushed to have Shleifer promoted to a prominent chair at Harvard. http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/Against-Larry-Summers-the-by-John-Wilson-081106-709.html&lt;/blockquote&gt;


3 additional pertinent articles:

a. &lt;i&gt;” The Enemy Within: President Obama Must Dump Summers?To Save His Presidency”&lt;/i&gt; by Debra Hanania-Freeman, ”http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2009/3613must_dump_summers.html

b. &lt;i&gt;”Eight reasons to dump Larry Summers”,&lt;/i&gt;
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2009/3613must_dump_summers.html

c. &lt;i&gt;”Larry Summers, Tim Geithner and Wall Street&#039;s ownership of government”&lt;/i&gt;http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/04/04/summers/

It’s scary that Summers is advising Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Bill H, for your article.  I hope you will post it far and wide across the media, and that you will send a copy to President Obama.</p>
<blockquote><p><i>” Personality, ego, and a blind belief in the ability of the market place to dictate the proper path and the correction has gotten in front of common sense. Maybe it is time to sideline Summers and his protégé Geithner in favor of Born, Mack, and Dorgan. Each has shown more foresight into how today’s problems and issues were created and how to resolve them.”</i></p></blockquote>
<p>It <i>is</i> time to sideline Summers.  His advice has clearly led us down the path to financial crisis.  Here’s another Summers’ caper:</p>
<blockquote><p>Andrei Shleifer, a close friend of Summers cost Harvard a $26 million settlement with the U.S. government. A federal court found Shleifer liable for conspiracy to defraud the U.S. Government, after Shleifer violated conflict-of-interest rules by making secret investments in Russia at the same time he was working for a Harvard group contracted by the U.S. Government to advise the Russian government. While Shleifer was being investigated, Summers pushed to have Shleifer promoted to a prominent chair at Harvard. <a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/Against-Larry-Summers-the-by-John-Wilson-081106-709.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.opednews.com/articl.....6-709.html</a></p></blockquote>
<p>3 additional pertinent articles:</p>
<p>a. <i>” The Enemy Within: President Obama Must Dump Summers?To Save His Presidency”</i> by Debra Hanania-Freeman, ”http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2009/3613must_dump_summers.html</p>
<p>b. <i>”Eight reasons to dump Larry Summers”,</i><br />
<a href="http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2009/3613must_dump_summers.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.larouchepub.com/oth.....mmers.html</a></p>
<p>c. <i>”Larry Summers, Tim Geithner and Wall Street&#8217;s ownership of government”</i><a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/04/04/summers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/opinion/g.....4/summers/</a></p>
<p>It’s scary that Summers is advising Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: run75441</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/04/16/the-messenger-wore-a-skirt/comment-page-1/#comment-14398</link>
		<dc:creator>run75441</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=8447#comment-14398</guid>
		<description>Just about the time I think I have it correct, I find I missed something . . . sigh! At Angry Bear blog, it was &quot;Stormy&quot; another sound economics writer. If you get a chance, please open up the Stanford Magazine and the Angry Bear sites. There is plenty of information on the former about Brooksley and much about Larry at Angry Bear. It is good to be armed with data and history. Read the comments in The Boston Globe site, they are good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just about the time I think I have it correct, I find I missed something . . . sigh! At Angry Bear blog, it was &#8220;Stormy&#8221; another sound economics writer. If you get a chance, please open up the Stanford Magazine and the Angry Bear sites. There is plenty of information on the former about Brooksley and much about Larry at Angry Bear. It is good to be armed with data and history. Read the comments in The Boston Globe site, they are good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S H Mills</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/04/16/the-messenger-wore-a-skirt/comment-page-1/#comment-14395</link>
		<dc:creator>S H Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=8447#comment-14395</guid>
		<description>Harvard Derivatives Whiz (Dr. Iris Mack) Fired For Whistleblowing (to Larry Summers) About Frightening Trades at Harvard Management Company

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciiKONDAucc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harvard Derivatives Whiz (Dr. Iris Mack) Fired For Whistleblowing (to Larry Summers) About Frightening Trades at Harvard Management Company</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciiKONDAucc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciiKONDAucc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia Ruccia</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/04/16/the-messenger-wore-a-skirt/comment-page-1/#comment-14392</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Ruccia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=8447#comment-14392</guid>
		<description>This story is one that should be retold every day many times over for the next 1000 years, kind of like the story of Queen Esther. This sad tale should be the tipping point of how we did things in the past and how we will do things in the future. The past-----denigrating women because they are women and not worthy of having any sense. The new----all ideas are on the table whatever body they emanate from!!!!

If the conventional wisdom is that we &quot;had to have Summers no matter what&quot; than the people who think that way have not just poor judgement but no judgement. This economy will right itself----let&#039;s hope the perpetrators won&#039;t get the undeserved credit of fixing it!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story is one that should be retold every day many times over for the next 1000 years, kind of like the story of Queen Esther. This sad tale should be the tipping point of how we did things in the past and how we will do things in the future. The past&#8212;&#8211;denigrating women because they are women and not worthy of having any sense. The new&#8212;-all ideas are on the table whatever body they emanate from!!!!</p>
<p>If the conventional wisdom is that we &#8220;had to have Summers no matter what&#8221; than the people who think that way have not just poor judgement but no judgement. This economy will right itself&#8212;-let&#8217;s hope the perpetrators won&#8217;t get the undeserved credit of fixing it!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

