<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good news and a &#8220;first&#8221; — Chief Performance Officer Nancy Killefer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/08/good-news-and-a-first-%e2%80%94-chief-performance-officer-nancy-killefer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/08/good-news-and-a-first-%e2%80%94-chief-performance-officer-nancy-killefer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/08/good-news-and-a-first-%e2%80%94-chief-performance-officer-nancy-killefer/comment-page-1/#comment-7912</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3688#comment-7912</guid>
		<description>KayJL

Love to read your posts! I&#039;m figuring there&#039;s a lot of focus on Obama now because 1) he&#039;s about to be sworn in as our next President, and 2) there&#039;s a lot of left over anger about how things went down with the Democratic party this year. But, I hope that once Inuaguration Day has passed, and while we will of course need to follow what any President is doing as far as women&#039;s issues go, that we will broaden what we&#039;re paying attention to AND focus on what TNA has stated to be a specific goal for 2009, which is domestic violence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KayJL</p>
<p>Love to read your posts! I&#8217;m figuring there&#8217;s a lot of focus on Obama now because 1) he&#8217;s about to be sworn in as our next President, and 2) there&#8217;s a lot of left over anger about how things went down with the Democratic party this year. But, I hope that once Inuaguration Day has passed, and while we will of course need to follow what any President is doing as far as women&#8217;s issues go, that we will broaden what we&#8217;re paying attention to AND focus on what TNA has stated to be a specific goal for 2009, which is domestic violence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gillian</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/08/good-news-and-a-first-%e2%80%94-chief-performance-officer-nancy-killefer/comment-page-1/#comment-7905</link>
		<dc:creator>Gillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3688#comment-7905</guid>
		<description>Go Vassar! (My college). :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Vassar! (My college). <img src='http://www.thenewagenda.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KayJL</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/08/good-news-and-a-first-%e2%80%94-chief-performance-officer-nancy-killefer/comment-page-1/#comment-7534</link>
		<dc:creator>KayJL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3688#comment-7534</guid>
		<description>hi, Anna...

it&#039;s true all eyes will be on Obama--he&#039;s president.  but one creative way of moving forward in addition to watching what the President does in regard to women&#039;s issues would be to also pay close attention to our state and local government, who&#039;s running for (and being elected) to those positions, and what are those people saying and doing about women&#039;s issues.

sexism is pervasive, stubbornly rooted in our history, and growing like a weed in our immediate neighborhoods--domestic violence, for example.  then there are our places of business, our local schools and how attitudes towards women (including girls&#039; attitudes about themselves) are being shaped from the get-go. 

I agree.  there&#039;s plenty we can do, and should do.  but that does include watchdogging the POTUS, regardless of who&#039;s in that position and whether or not we voted for him.  and the people who did vote for him have to be realistic about that.  the President of the United States is just about the last person who&#039;s ever going to get a pass on scrutiny, regardless of issue.

one other perspective about the POTUS.  every four years anywhere from approximately 41 to 49.5% of the population is unhappy with who&#039;s occupying the WH.  the country always survives without 100% needing to achieve lockstep. 

the public figure under the microscope in a discussion doesn&#039;t  have to be the POTUS, either.  I&#039;d feel the same way if I made a comment about Rick Warren and sexism, and one of the conservative members took it as a signal that I needed to be reconciled with Jesus.  

imo the people Americans need to be reconciling with are other Americans.  this country has been polarized by wingnut control of both major parties for too long, and we can&#039;t keep letting ourselves be torn apart by politicians, or their supporters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, Anna&#8230;</p>
<p>it&#8217;s true all eyes will be on Obama&#8211;he&#8217;s president.  but one creative way of moving forward in addition to watching what the President does in regard to women&#8217;s issues would be to also pay close attention to our state and local government, who&#8217;s running for (and being elected) to those positions, and what are those people saying and doing about women&#8217;s issues.</p>
<p>sexism is pervasive, stubbornly rooted in our history, and growing like a weed in our immediate neighborhoods&#8211;domestic violence, for example.  then there are our places of business, our local schools and how attitudes towards women (including girls&#8217; attitudes about themselves) are being shaped from the get-go. </p>
<p>I agree.  there&#8217;s plenty we can do, and should do.  but that does include watchdogging the POTUS, regardless of who&#8217;s in that position and whether or not we voted for him.  and the people who did vote for him have to be realistic about that.  the President of the United States is just about the last person who&#8217;s ever going to get a pass on scrutiny, regardless of issue.</p>
<p>one other perspective about the POTUS.  every four years anywhere from approximately 41 to 49.5% of the population is unhappy with who&#8217;s occupying the WH.  the country always survives without 100% needing to achieve lockstep. </p>
<p>the public figure under the microscope in a discussion doesn&#8217;t  have to be the POTUS, either.  I&#8217;d feel the same way if I made a comment about Rick Warren and sexism, and one of the conservative members took it as a signal that I needed to be reconciled with Jesus.  </p>
<p>imo the people Americans need to be reconciling with are other Americans.  this country has been polarized by wingnut control of both major parties for too long, and we can&#8217;t keep letting ourselves be torn apart by politicians, or their supporters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/08/good-news-and-a-first-%e2%80%94-chief-performance-officer-nancy-killefer/comment-page-1/#comment-7428</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3688#comment-7428</guid>
		<description>Is it my imagination, or do threads that are highly emotional and very anti-Obama more interesting than those that are about something positive and/or highly informative in ways that stretch beyond Obama hate.

I did not support Obama. And I distain much about him. But if we don&#039;t get past what I see as an obsession about Obama, Clinton and Palin I fear we will remain stuck and flailing in the wind.

Women&#039;s issues can be tackled on many fronts.

What groups is TNA collaborating with at this point? How can we start to move forward in creative ways in addition to responding to Obama&#039;s decisions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it my imagination, or do threads that are highly emotional and very anti-Obama more interesting than those that are about something positive and/or highly informative in ways that stretch beyond Obama hate.</p>
<p>I did not support Obama. And I distain much about him. But if we don&#8217;t get past what I see as an obsession about Obama, Clinton and Palin I fear we will remain stuck and flailing in the wind.</p>
<p>Women&#8217;s issues can be tackled on many fronts.</p>
<p>What groups is TNA collaborating with at this point? How can we start to move forward in creative ways in addition to responding to Obama&#8217;s decisions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/08/good-news-and-a-first-%e2%80%94-chief-performance-officer-nancy-killefer/comment-page-1/#comment-7291</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3688#comment-7291</guid>
		<description>Gretchen, thank you for this intellegent and interesting piece on  Nancy, since I knew nothing about her!
Yes there will be challenges, but aren&#039;t we (women) used to that.? After all, in history, we&#039;ve had few roadmaps to guide us...and now another challenge is just that.
So I wish her the best and will watch her take the bull..and run with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gretchen, thank you for this intellegent and interesting piece on  Nancy, since I knew nothing about her!<br />
Yes there will be challenges, but aren&#8217;t we (women) used to that.? After all, in history, we&#8217;ve had few roadmaps to guide us&#8230;and now another challenge is just that.<br />
So I wish her the best and will watch her take the bull..and run with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/08/good-news-and-a-first-%e2%80%94-chief-performance-officer-nancy-killefer/comment-page-1/#comment-7283</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3688#comment-7283</guid>
		<description>Gretchen - Thanks for this piece. I had heard about her but knew very little. This article was extremely informative. And, while any new position faces unique challenges, this is a start. We shall see how it unfolds.

goesh - I wouldn&#039;t assume this position is &quot;fluff&quot; because it&#039;s new. I&#039;m a super anxious, worrier, glass-is-half empty, skeptical, critical sort of person, but even I have a sense of let&#039;s see what happens! If I can do that, anyone can!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gretchen &#8211; Thanks for this piece. I had heard about her but knew very little. This article was extremely informative. And, while any new position faces unique challenges, this is a start. We shall see how it unfolds.</p>
<p>goesh &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t assume this position is &#8220;fluff&#8221; because it&#8217;s new. I&#8217;m a super anxious, worrier, glass-is-half empty, skeptical, critical sort of person, but even I have a sense of let&#8217;s see what happens! If I can do that, anyone can!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KayJL</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/08/good-news-and-a-first-%e2%80%94-chief-performance-officer-nancy-killefer/comment-page-1/#comment-7255</link>
		<dc:creator>KayJL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3688#comment-7255</guid>
		<description>gee, she does sound really solid, and I like the job position.  imo it refers back to two elements of the campaign--McCain saying he would utilize Palin to reform government agencies, and Obama saying he would approach government reform with a scalpel.

enter the scalpel :)

I hope this works out, it&#039;s really encouraging, but one key will be how well she&#039;s supported when she locates government excess/corruption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gee, she does sound really solid, and I like the job position.  imo it refers back to two elements of the campaign&#8211;McCain saying he would utilize Palin to reform government agencies, and Obama saying he would approach government reform with a scalpel.</p>
<p>enter the scalpel <img src='http://www.thenewagenda.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I hope this works out, it&#8217;s really encouraging, but one key will be how well she&#8217;s supported when she locates government excess/corruption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goesh</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/08/good-news-and-a-first-%e2%80%94-chief-performance-officer-nancy-killefer/comment-page-1/#comment-7250</link>
		<dc:creator>goesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3688#comment-7250</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad of the gender chosen to fill the new position but its a new position with no history, no heritage, no culture and that mean&#039;s a constant battle with long entrenched agencies all vying for budget money  and power - a woman with alot of brains and talent in a fluff position is better than no woman in said position. Our hope still lies in grassroots movements such as NA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad of the gender chosen to fill the new position but its a new position with no history, no heritage, no culture and that mean&#8217;s a constant battle with long entrenched agencies all vying for budget money  and power &#8211; a woman with alot of brains and talent in a fluff position is better than no woman in said position. Our hope still lies in grassroots movements such as NA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

