<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama should appoint a woman to Commerce, because jobs for women are not a given.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/05/obama-should-appoint-a-woman-to-commerce-because-jobs-for-women-are-not-a-given/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/05/obama-should-appoint-a-woman-to-commerce-because-jobs-for-women-are-not-a-given/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reclusive Leftist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Three disparate topics, but with a hidden thread connecting them (can you guess what it is?)</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/05/obama-should-appoint-a-woman-to-commerce-because-jobs-for-women-are-not-a-given/comment-page-1/#comment-7122</link>
		<dc:creator>Reclusive Leftist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Three disparate topics, but with a hidden thread connecting them (can you guess what it is?)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3582#comment-7122</guid>
		<description>[...] read this excellente post by Sheryl Robinson over at The New Agenda: Obama should appoint a woman to Commerce, because jobs for women are not a given. Sneaky, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read this excellente post by Sheryl Robinson over at The New Agenda: Obama should appoint a woman to Commerce, because jobs for women are not a given. Sneaky, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make Them Accountable / Media &#38; Politics (one section only today)</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/05/obama-should-appoint-a-woman-to-commerce-because-jobs-for-women-are-not-a-given/comment-page-1/#comment-7082</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Them Accountable / Media &#38; Politics (one section only today)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3582#comment-7082</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama should appoint a woman to Commerce, because jobs for women are not a given. (by Sheryl Robinson at the New Agenda) Women typically suffer greater hardship than men in times of economic downturn. More women in government means more support for issues that affect women, according to the UNIFEM report released this Fall. For this reason, Obama should appoint a woman to replace Bill Richardson, who has withdrawn as U.S. Secretary of Commerce-designate. Is Obama listening?  See below. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama should appoint a woman to Commerce, because jobs for women are not a given. (by Sheryl Robinson at the New Agenda) Women typically suffer greater hardship than men in times of economic downturn. More women in government means more support for issues that affect women, according to the UNIFEM report released this Fall. For this reason, Obama should appoint a woman to replace Bill Richardson, who has withdrawn as U.S. Secretary of Commerce-designate. Is Obama listening?  See below. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuesday: What is PUMA? &#171; The Confluence</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/05/obama-should-appoint-a-woman-to-commerce-because-jobs-for-women-are-not-a-given/comment-page-1/#comment-7066</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuesday: What is PUMA? &#171; The Confluence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3582#comment-7066</guid>
		<description>[...] Amy Siskind of The New Agenda must have read our post on the Double X, where we call for scrutiny of the next Congress&#8217;s legislation in order to ensure that women benefit from any stimulus packages that are proposed.  She pointed me in the direction of this post by Sheryl Robinson, Obama should appoint a woman to Commerce because jobs are not a given.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Amy Siskind of The New Agenda must have read our post on the Double X, where we call for scrutiny of the next Congress&#8217;s legislation in order to ensure that women benefit from any stimulus packages that are proposed.  She pointed me in the direction of this post by Sheryl Robinson, Obama should appoint a woman to Commerce because jobs are not a given.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Chase</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/05/obama-should-appoint-a-woman-to-commerce-because-jobs-for-women-are-not-a-given/comment-page-1/#comment-7049</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3582#comment-7049</guid>
		<description>I think this organization is on the right track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this organization is on the right track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheryl Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/05/obama-should-appoint-a-woman-to-commerce-because-jobs-for-women-are-not-a-given/comment-page-1/#comment-7048</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheryl Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3582#comment-7048</guid>
		<description>Ack! 3 million, not 300 million. Fixed it. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ack! 3 million, not 300 million. Fixed it. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KendallJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/05/obama-should-appoint-a-woman-to-commerce-because-jobs-for-women-are-not-a-given/comment-page-1/#comment-7047</link>
		<dc:creator>KendallJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3582#comment-7047</guid>
		<description>Hi Amy,

The radio show was great tonite. 

I think we know what we need to work on, and it&#039;s a long list. I think the planning, strategyzing and tactical moves are what we need to think about.  

We need a voice in the media. The question is how do we get one and can we get a voice without having to compromise the message to such an extent that it&#039;s drowned out anyway. Maybe the use of targetted boycotting can create an avenue for gaining access to the media and influence over the message.

One thing I think we need to think about is the differences between the women&#039;s movement and others such as the civil rights and gay rights movements. Women are not and do not form a community. Many other groups do. We are parts of other communities, but don&#039;t make up a community of our own in the same way that there is a &quot;black community&quot; for example. 

Gender dynamics are very complicated and because we give birth to men, we sleep with them, they are our brothers, fathers, husbands and sons, we are not a separate &quot;community&quot; from them. The familial relationships we have with men often isolate us from our cause. Because of this reality, we need different approaches, support systems and strategies to moving us forward. 

Educating children and adults about women&#039;s history and oppression in this country and the world is severely lacking. and is very important The civil rights movement is a big part of what our kids are learning in the public school systems. Almost every 10th grader knows of MLK Jr. and Melcolm X, but most college educated women don&#039;t know about Alice Paul, Elizabeth Caddy Stanton, Margret Sanger and so on. I learned of Susan B. Anthony in high school, while learning about the abolitionist movement to end slavery. It wasn&#039;t until I was in college and taking women&#039;s studies courses that I learned of her women&#039;s rights work.  We have taught a whole generation about the Civil Rights movement and the history of black slavery and segregation in this country, but they know almost nothing of women&#039;s struggles and our History. This is truley appaulling. This is a big peice of the puzzle and until people understand our history and oppression, we will not move forward. Through education, we can create a collective consciousness about sexism and misogyny that does not currently exist. The success of erasing our history and struggle is exactly what has kept us invisible. 

Sorry for being all over the place, but I&#039;m just thinking out loud. 

Thanks for listening my thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amy,</p>
<p>The radio show was great tonite. </p>
<p>I think we know what we need to work on, and it&#8217;s a long list. I think the planning, strategyzing and tactical moves are what we need to think about.  </p>
<p>We need a voice in the media. The question is how do we get one and can we get a voice without having to compromise the message to such an extent that it&#8217;s drowned out anyway. Maybe the use of targetted boycotting can create an avenue for gaining access to the media and influence over the message.</p>
<p>One thing I think we need to think about is the differences between the women&#8217;s movement and others such as the civil rights and gay rights movements. Women are not and do not form a community. Many other groups do. We are parts of other communities, but don&#8217;t make up a community of our own in the same way that there is a &#8220;black community&#8221; for example. </p>
<p>Gender dynamics are very complicated and because we give birth to men, we sleep with them, they are our brothers, fathers, husbands and sons, we are not a separate &#8220;community&#8221; from them. The familial relationships we have with men often isolate us from our cause. Because of this reality, we need different approaches, support systems and strategies to moving us forward. </p>
<p>Educating children and adults about women&#8217;s history and oppression in this country and the world is severely lacking. and is very important The civil rights movement is a big part of what our kids are learning in the public school systems. Almost every 10th grader knows of MLK Jr. and Melcolm X, but most college educated women don&#8217;t know about Alice Paul, Elizabeth Caddy Stanton, Margret Sanger and so on. I learned of Susan B. Anthony in high school, while learning about the abolitionist movement to end slavery. It wasn&#8217;t until I was in college and taking women&#8217;s studies courses that I learned of her women&#8217;s rights work.  We have taught a whole generation about the Civil Rights movement and the history of black slavery and segregation in this country, but they know almost nothing of women&#8217;s struggles and our History. This is truley appaulling. This is a big peice of the puzzle and until people understand our history and oppression, we will not move forward. Through education, we can create a collective consciousness about sexism and misogyny that does not currently exist. The success of erasing our history and struggle is exactly what has kept us invisible. </p>
<p>Sorry for being all over the place, but I&#8217;m just thinking out loud. </p>
<p>Thanks for listening my thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/05/obama-should-appoint-a-woman-to-commerce-because-jobs-for-women-are-not-a-given/comment-page-1/#comment-7041</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3582#comment-7041</guid>
		<description>Sorry....

3.  Title: ...appoint a woman as Secretary of Commerce, instead of &#039;to Commerce.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry&#8230;.</p>
<p>3.  Title: &#8230;appoint a woman as Secretary of Commerce, instead of &#8216;to Commerce.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/05/obama-should-appoint-a-woman-to-commerce-because-jobs-for-women-are-not-a-given/comment-page-1/#comment-7037</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3582#comment-7037</guid>
		<description>Sheryl

Great work!  You managed to weave a lot of different things into the whole with a good sense of logic and flow. Not easy to do. Thank you for doing the research, organizing the info and writing a great piece!

Two tips for future reference

1. When using acronyms (like UNIFEM) always spell out the name of the org so readers who don&#039;t know what it means (I include myself in that ignorant bunch) can be educated. Otherwise, such junctures can become a wall the reader hits and some don&#039;t continue on (thanks to the increasingly short attention span of the American public).

2. The reference to infastracture jobs comes late in the piece and a bit out of the blue. Perhaps more logical to put up in the first paragraph to help make sense of the opening claim regarding women&#039;s concerns about being left out of the stimulus package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheryl</p>
<p>Great work!  You managed to weave a lot of different things into the whole with a good sense of logic and flow. Not easy to do. Thank you for doing the research, organizing the info and writing a great piece!</p>
<p>Two tips for future reference</p>
<p>1. When using acronyms (like UNIFEM) always spell out the name of the org so readers who don&#8217;t know what it means (I include myself in that ignorant bunch) can be educated. Otherwise, such junctures can become a wall the reader hits and some don&#8217;t continue on (thanks to the increasingly short attention span of the American public).</p>
<p>2. The reference to infastracture jobs comes late in the piece and a bit out of the blue. Perhaps more logical to put up in the first paragraph to help make sense of the opening claim regarding women&#8217;s concerns about being left out of the stimulus package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KendallJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/05/obama-should-appoint-a-woman-to-commerce-because-jobs-for-women-are-not-a-given/comment-page-1/#comment-7035</link>
		<dc:creator>KendallJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3582#comment-7035</guid>
		<description>Sheryl,

You said &quot;300 million jobs&quot;. Is this a typo? I&#039;ve heard Obama talk about 5 million, 17 million less than Clinton created, but not 300 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheryl,</p>
<p>You said &#8220;300 million jobs&#8221;. Is this a typo? I&#8217;ve heard Obama talk about 5 million, 17 million less than Clinton created, but not 300 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Belle</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2009/01/05/obama-should-appoint-a-woman-to-commerce-because-jobs-for-women-are-not-a-given/comment-page-1/#comment-7021</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Belle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=3582#comment-7021</guid>
		<description>Spot on. You nailed the most important aspect of this. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on. You nailed the most important aspect of this. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

