<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Name that PR Firm???</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/08/name-that-pr-firm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/08/name-that-pr-firm/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Ms. Serious? &#171; Blue Lyon</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/08/name-that-pr-firm/comment-page-1/#comment-7794</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Ms. Serious? &#171; Blue Lyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2515#comment-7794</guid>
		<description>[...] a trick. We’ve seen this kind of rehabilitation before. We saw it with Summers and Favreau, when articles that showed them a favorable light, especially articles by women began to emerge from various media [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a trick. We’ve seen this kind of rehabilitation before. We saw it with Summers and Favreau, when articles that showed them a favorable light, especially articles by women began to emerge from various media [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That&#8217;s Really Super, Supergirl &#171; peacocks and lilies</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/08/name-that-pr-firm/comment-page-1/#comment-7565</link>
		<dc:creator>That&#8217;s Really Super, Supergirl &#171; peacocks and lilies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2515#comment-7565</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve seen this kind of rehabilitation before. We saw it with Summers and Favreau, when articles that showed them a favorable light, especially articles by women began to emerge from various media [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;ve seen this kind of rehabilitation before. We saw it with Summers and Favreau, when articles that showed them a favorable light, especially articles by women began to emerge from various media [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yes, we are aware of Ms. Magazine cover&#8230;. : The New Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/08/name-that-pr-firm/comment-page-1/#comment-7508</link>
		<dc:creator>Yes, we are aware of Ms. Magazine cover&#8230;. : The New Agenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2515#comment-7508</guid>
		<description>[...] now haven&#8217;t we.  Remember Larry Summers suddenly getting all sort of adulating press (e.g. hiring a PR firm to repair his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now haven&#8217;t we.  Remember Larry Summers suddenly getting all sort of adulating press (e.g. hiring a PR firm to repair his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/08/name-that-pr-firm/comment-page-1/#comment-4471</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2515#comment-4471</guid>
		<description>P.S. Ignore the ?-marks in the post above. Not sure why they showed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. Ignore the ?-marks in the post above. Not sure why they showed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ER</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/08/name-that-pr-firm/comment-page-1/#comment-4470</link>
		<dc:creator>ER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2515#comment-4470</guid>
		<description>Great idea!  While we&#039;re looking for Larry&#039;s PR firm, here are some facts and words to use to respond to each of the &#039;glowing&#039; articles on Larry Summers.  (Usually the newspapers have a place to voice your opinions on articles.  Also, letters to the editor, etc wouldn&#039;t hurt).

1. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://thenewagenda.net/2008/11/09/the-boston-globe-on-summers-and-the-new-agenda/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;from Sheryl Robinson’s post on The New Agenda)&lt;/a&gt;:  Summers was a main player in financial deregulation, a primary cause of the present economic crisis. Summers sought to silence Brooksley Born, head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, who correctly foresaw that unregulated derivatives trading could put other financial markets at risk. While Born attempted to draft regulations to address this risk, Summers and his cronies accused her of fostering a financial crisis. Congress, apparently under pressure from Summers et al, suspended Born’s Commissions’ regulatory authority. Born then left her position as head of the Commission. “It was Larry Summers who called her up and screamed at her,” according to Siskind, who notes that the financial meltdown might have been averted if Summers had listened to Born (a woman).?? 

2. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whirledbank.org/ourwords/summers.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;While at the World Bank&lt;/a&gt;, Summers signed a memo that declared: “Just between you and me, shouldn&#039;t the World Bank be encouraging MORE migration of the dirty industries to the LDCs [Least Developed Countries]?” The memo noted, “I think the economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable and we should face up to that.”?. 
?
3. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/Against-Larry-Summers-the-by-John-Wilson-081106-709.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Andrei Shleifer&lt;/a&gt;, a close friend of Summers cost Harvard a $26 million settlement with the U.S. government. A federal court found Shleifer liable for conspiracy to defraud the U.S. Government, after Shleifer violated conflict-of-interest rules by making secret investments in Russia at the same time he was working for a Harvard group contracted by the U.S. Government to advise the Russian government. While Shleifer was being investigated, Summers pushed to have Shleifer promoted to a prominent chair at Harvard. 

4. Conflict of interest: Summers is a managing director of the hedge fund D. E. Shaw &amp; Co. Will he try to help his friends by continuing to bail out businesses?

Keep up the pressure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea!  While we&#8217;re looking for Larry&#8217;s PR firm, here are some facts and words to use to respond to each of the &#8216;glowing&#8217; articles on Larry Summers.  (Usually the newspapers have a place to voice your opinions on articles.  Also, letters to the editor, etc wouldn&#8217;t hurt).</p>
<p>1. (<a href="http://thenewagenda.net/2008/11/09/the-boston-globe-on-summers-and-the-new-agenda/" rel="nofollow">from Sheryl Robinson’s post on The New Agenda)</a>:  Summers was a main player in financial deregulation, a primary cause of the present economic crisis. Summers sought to silence Brooksley Born, head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, who correctly foresaw that unregulated derivatives trading could put other financial markets at risk. While Born attempted to draft regulations to address this risk, Summers and his cronies accused her of fostering a financial crisis. Congress, apparently under pressure from Summers et al, suspended Born’s Commissions’ regulatory authority. Born then left her position as head of the Commission. “It was Larry Summers who called her up and screamed at her,” according to Siskind, who notes that the financial meltdown might have been averted if Summers had listened to Born (a woman).?? </p>
<p>2. <a href="http://www.whirledbank.org/ourwords/summers.html" rel="nofollow">While at the World Bank</a>, Summers signed a memo that declared: “Just between you and me, shouldn&#8217;t the World Bank be encouraging MORE migration of the dirty industries to the LDCs [Least Developed Countries]?” The memo noted, “I think the economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable and we should face up to that.”?.<br />
?<br />
3. <a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/Against-Larry-Summers-the-by-John-Wilson-081106-709.html" rel="nofollow">Andrei Shleifer</a>, a close friend of Summers cost Harvard a $26 million settlement with the U.S. government. A federal court found Shleifer liable for conspiracy to defraud the U.S. Government, after Shleifer violated conflict-of-interest rules by making secret investments in Russia at the same time he was working for a Harvard group contracted by the U.S. Government to advise the Russian government. While Shleifer was being investigated, Summers pushed to have Shleifer promoted to a prominent chair at Harvard. </p>
<p>4. Conflict of interest: Summers is a managing director of the hedge fund D. E. Shaw &amp; Co. Will he try to help his friends by continuing to bail out businesses?</p>
<p>Keep up the pressure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zee</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/08/name-that-pr-firm/comment-page-1/#comment-4421</link>
		<dc:creator>Zee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2515#comment-4421</guid>
		<description>If they need to rehabilitate him, we&#039;re working.

Let&#039;s keep the pressure up.  Send Summers to pasture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they need to rehabilitate him, we&#8217;re working.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s keep the pressure up.  Send Summers to pasture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

