<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will President-elect Obama fire Jon Favreau?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/06/will-president-elect-obama-fire-jon-favreau/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/06/will-president-elect-obama-fire-jon-favreau/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Obama Sold Women Out : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/06/will-president-elect-obama-fire-jon-favreau/comment-page-2/#comment-31313</link>
		<dc:creator>How Obama Sold Women Out : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2448#comment-31313</guid>
		<description>[...] or &#8220;you&#8217;re likable enough,&#8221; or saw Obama&#8217;s speechwriter Jon Favreau groping the breast of a cardboard cutout of Hillary Clinton on Facebook (no comment), these leaders ignored the signs of subtle misogyny. The National [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or &#8220;you&#8217;re likable enough,&#8221; or saw Obama&#8217;s speechwriter Jon Favreau groping the breast of a cardboard cutout of Hillary Clinton on Facebook (no comment), these leaders ignored the signs of subtle misogyny. The National [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh ****, Do We Have To Listen To This **** Again? : The New Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/06/will-president-elect-obama-fire-jon-favreau/comment-page-2/#comment-14009</link>
		<dc:creator>Oh ****, Do We Have To Listen To This **** Again? : The New Agenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2448#comment-14009</guid>
		<description>[...] ugly, but it&#8217;s business as usual.  It reminds me of Sheryl Robinson&#8217;s piece about Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau and the cutout of Hillary&#8212;&#8211;that kind of frat boy behavior.  However, the frat boy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ugly, but it&#8217;s business as usual.  It reminds me of Sheryl Robinson&#8217;s piece about Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau and the cutout of Hillary&#8212;&#8211;that kind of frat boy behavior.  However, the frat boy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Plumley</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/06/will-president-elect-obama-fire-jon-favreau/comment-page-2/#comment-7498</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Plumley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2448#comment-7498</guid>
		<description>I am not a lawyer, but a scientist and mother.  However, if this is a country of for and by the people, isn&#039;t Favreau sexually harrassing the whole country.  Seriously, if we hired Obama and he works for us, and we can document the hostile work place.  Another female speechwriter is in the photograph, and thousands of women have personally responded in disgust.   They clearly know they are in violation of the law.  So, why exactly can&#039;t we title 9 them or something?  Lawyers, please?  They are never going to let us be free.  We have to take it.  Otherwise, mental midgets like Napolean above, will always be there to push us back down on our knees.  We must help each other.  Obama has a voting block now of misogynists, homophobes, and right wing xians.  These little digs of his against all things feminine serve to solidify his base, we must protect each other in this scary new day.  The boys are back.  Watch out environment.  Watch out democracy.  Howard Dean is in the House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a lawyer, but a scientist and mother.  However, if this is a country of for and by the people, isn&#8217;t Favreau sexually harrassing the whole country.  Seriously, if we hired Obama and he works for us, and we can document the hostile work place.  Another female speechwriter is in the photograph, and thousands of women have personally responded in disgust.   They clearly know they are in violation of the law.  So, why exactly can&#8217;t we title 9 them or something?  Lawyers, please?  They are never going to let us be free.  We have to take it.  Otherwise, mental midgets like Napolean above, will always be there to push us back down on our knees.  We must help each other.  Obama has a voting block now of misogynists, homophobes, and right wing xians.  These little digs of his against all things feminine serve to solidify his base, we must protect each other in this scary new day.  The boys are back.  Watch out environment.  Watch out democracy.  Howard Dean is in the House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Round Up: Blago, Obama Politics, Misogyny, and More &#124; Red Hot &#38; Blue Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/06/will-president-elect-obama-fire-jon-favreau/comment-page-2/#comment-6906</link>
		<dc:creator>News Round Up: Blago, Obama Politics, Misogyny, and More &#124; Red Hot &#38; Blue Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2448#comment-6906</guid>
		<description>[...] change we can believe in: Obama&#8217;s top speech writer gropes Hillary&#8217;s breast &#8230; yet another puerile act or indicative of campaign rooted in sexism, misogyny, and Clinton [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] change we can believe in: Obama&#8217;s top speech writer gropes Hillary&#8217;s breast &#8230; yet another puerile act or indicative of campaign rooted in sexism, misogyny, and Clinton [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthisgold</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/06/will-president-elect-obama-fire-jon-favreau/comment-page-2/#comment-4858</link>
		<dc:creator>truthisgold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2448#comment-4858</guid>
		<description>Amy and All,

One of the reasons I feel that our work ahead is so challenging is that it is apparent that neither Messrs. Obama and Favreau nor any other members of that staff exhibit even the slightest interest in acknowledging or changing the current sexist status quo.  He is considerably behind Bush in appointments to women and has never demonstrated any desire to be anything other than condescending and misogynistic toward women [&#039;you&#039;re likeable enough, Hillary&#039;]

This does not mean that we have not already made an impact or that we are not doing well--in the short time since our incarnation, we have made some great strides and become a recognizeable force in the fight for women&#039;s rights.  It simply means that we have a lot more work to do, and that we cannot depend upon &quot;the kindness of strangers&quot;, especially when they come in the persons of Favreau and Obama etal.  We need to remember that people like these are not allies in the fight for women&#039;s and human rights, and they will not be inclined to assist us willingly in any way.

That being said, I congratulate everyone for what we have been able to accomplish thus far, and I have strong faith in our capabilities in terms of attaining our goals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy and All,</p>
<p>One of the reasons I feel that our work ahead is so challenging is that it is apparent that neither Messrs. Obama and Favreau nor any other members of that staff exhibit even the slightest interest in acknowledging or changing the current sexist status quo.  He is considerably behind Bush in appointments to women and has never demonstrated any desire to be anything other than condescending and misogynistic toward women ['you're likeable enough, Hillary']</p>
<p>This does not mean that we have not already made an impact or that we are not doing well&#8211;in the short time since our incarnation, we have made some great strides and become a recognizeable force in the fight for women&#8217;s rights.  It simply means that we have a lot more work to do, and that we cannot depend upon &#8220;the kindness of strangers&#8221;, especially when they come in the persons of Favreau and Obama etal.  We need to remember that people like these are not allies in the fight for women&#8217;s and human rights, and they will not be inclined to assist us willingly in any way.</p>
<p>That being said, I congratulate everyone for what we have been able to accomplish thus far, and I have strong faith in our capabilities in terms of attaining our goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lightacandle</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/06/will-president-elect-obama-fire-jon-favreau/comment-page-2/#comment-4801</link>
		<dc:creator>lightacandle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2448#comment-4801</guid>
		<description>Some people don&#039;t &quot;get&quot; it regarding the sick Jon Favreau photograph, which he not only posed for but later posted on Facebook where the world could view it.

( photo at: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/12/04/one_more_question.html )

I have heard that colleges  and potential employers routinely scrutinize Facebook and other websites to see if applicants have posted anything they (the employers and admissions officers) deem crass, lacking in respect for fellow human beings, or lacking in common sense.

Jon Favreau&#039;s photo of himself and an Obama staffer friend portraying the date-rape of Hillary Clinton  is all three of the above.

Any respectable and responsible workplace would NOT allow someone at the management level to post such a picture of a workplace colleague ... and would, in FACT, consider the Favreau photo degrading to a fellow employee and creating a &quot;hostile work environment&quot; for the female co-workers ... and would FIRE the perpetrator (Jon Favreau, in  this case).

Jon Favreau SHOULD be FIRED.

He lacks good judgment.

He lacks common courtesy.

He lacks common sense.

And he lacks a respectful attitude toward an Obama administration colleague ... Favreau and Clinton are SUPPOSED to be on the same team.

Jon Favreau is clearly NOT on the same team with Sen. Clinton and is clearly creating a HOSTILE work situation.

The ones who don&#039;t &quot;get&quot; this and think this is &quot;just&quot; the stupid prank of a drunk frat-boy have a serious problem and should seek counseling.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

&quot;SHADOW&quot; now . . . and &quot;SHADOW&quot; forever!

&quot;Stop Humiliation And Disparagement Of Women&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people don&#8217;t &#8220;get&#8221; it regarding the sick Jon Favreau photograph, which he not only posed for but later posted on Facebook where the world could view it.</p>
<p>( photo at: <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/12/04/one_more_question.html" rel="nofollow">http://voices.washingtonpost.c.....stion.html</a> )</p>
<p>I have heard that colleges  and potential employers routinely scrutinize Facebook and other websites to see if applicants have posted anything they (the employers and admissions officers) deem crass, lacking in respect for fellow human beings, or lacking in common sense.</p>
<p>Jon Favreau&#8217;s photo of himself and an Obama staffer friend portraying the date-rape of Hillary Clinton  is all three of the above.</p>
<p>Any respectable and responsible workplace would NOT allow someone at the management level to post such a picture of a workplace colleague &#8230; and would, in FACT, consider the Favreau photo degrading to a fellow employee and creating a &#8220;hostile work environment&#8221; for the female co-workers &#8230; and would FIRE the perpetrator (Jon Favreau, in  this case).</p>
<p>Jon Favreau SHOULD be FIRED.</p>
<p>He lacks good judgment.</p>
<p>He lacks common courtesy.</p>
<p>He lacks common sense.</p>
<p>And he lacks a respectful attitude toward an Obama administration colleague &#8230; Favreau and Clinton are SUPPOSED to be on the same team.</p>
<p>Jon Favreau is clearly NOT on the same team with Sen. Clinton and is clearly creating a HOSTILE work situation.</p>
<p>The ones who don&#8217;t &#8220;get&#8221; this and think this is &#8220;just&#8221; the stupid prank of a drunk frat-boy have a serious problem and should seek counseling.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>&#8220;SHADOW&#8221; now . . . and &#8220;SHADOW&#8221; forever!</p>
<p>&#8220;Stop Humiliation And Disparagement Of Women&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Hot &#38; Blue Wednesday Roundup for 12/10/08 &#124; Red Hot &#38; Blue Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/06/will-president-elect-obama-fire-jon-favreau/comment-page-2/#comment-4726</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Hot &#38; Blue Wednesday Roundup for 12/10/08 &#124; Red Hot &#38; Blue Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2448#comment-4726</guid>
		<description>[...] in the White House. Aren&#8217;t we supposed to expect more from Mr. Hopey-Changy, his staff, and the man with “authority over [Obama’s] own words”? I guess not. Just add this to the list and litany of sexism and misogyny rampant within Team [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the White House. Aren&#8217;t we supposed to expect more from Mr. Hopey-Changy, his staff, and the man with “authority over [Obama’s] own words”? I guess not. Just add this to the list and litany of sexism and misogyny rampant within Team [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New Agenda turns 4 months old&#8230; : The New Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/06/will-president-elect-obama-fire-jon-favreau/comment-page-2/#comment-4702</link>
		<dc:creator>The New Agenda turns 4 months old&#8230; : The New Agenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2448#comment-4702</guid>
		<description>[...] first organization to speak out on Favreau and &#8220;Gropersgate&#8221; (thanks to Riverdaughter or Murph for coming up with the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first organization to speak out on Favreau and &#8220;Gropersgate&#8221; (thanks to Riverdaughter or Murph for coming up with the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chief speechwriter for Obama’s presidential campaign acting like an Asshole &#171; Quelques Filles</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/06/will-president-elect-obama-fire-jon-favreau/comment-page-2/#comment-4646</link>
		<dc:creator>Chief speechwriter for Obama’s presidential campaign acting like an Asshole &#171; Quelques Filles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2448#comment-4646</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted by somuchbraver under Danielle &#124; Tags: Politics, date rape, fraternities &#124; &#160;  Here is a link to a much better blog entry, but I thought everyone could stand to take a look at this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted by somuchbraver under Danielle | Tags: Politics, date rape, fraternities | &nbsp;  Here is a link to a much better blog entry, but I thought everyone could stand to take a look at this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Napoleon</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/12/06/will-president-elect-obama-fire-jon-favreau/comment-page-2/#comment-4637</link>
		<dc:creator>Napoleon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=2448#comment-4637</guid>
		<description>Anne? What in tarnation? This country started going downhill when the stocks were abolished? I mean, I realize it&#039;s fun to vent on a blog, but really, this is crazy. I just can&#039;t believe this. 

If women&#039;s rights advocates hope for a better future, there needs to be reasoned debate. This is not reasonable debate. This is blind outrage. If we sanction blind outrage, why expect real misogynists and real pigs to listen, reflect, and change. If Favreau is a pig, just who are the good guys?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne? What in tarnation? This country started going downhill when the stocks were abolished? I mean, I realize it&#8217;s fun to vent on a blog, but really, this is crazy. I just can&#8217;t believe this. </p>
<p>If women&#8217;s rights advocates hope for a better future, there needs to be reasoned debate. This is not reasonable debate. This is blind outrage. If we sanction blind outrage, why expect real misogynists and real pigs to listen, reflect, and change. If Favreau is a pig, just who are the good guys?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

