<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Summers is Over: The Washington Post reports on The New Agenda&#8217;s anti-Summers position</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/11/06/summers-is-over-the-washington-post-reports-on-the-new-agendas-anti-summers-position/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/11/06/summers-is-over-the-washington-post-reports-on-the-new-agendas-anti-summers-position/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/11/06/summers-is-over-the-washington-post-reports-on-the-new-agendas-anti-summers-position/comment-page-1/#comment-2572</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1425#comment-2572</guid>
		<description>Read it and see what you think.

http://www.president.harvard.edu/speeches/2005/nber.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read it and see what you think.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.president.harvard.edu/speeches/2005/nber.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.president.harvard.e...../nber.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/11/06/summers-is-over-the-washington-post-reports-on-the-new-agendas-anti-summers-position/comment-page-1/#comment-2571</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1425#comment-2571</guid>
		<description>If this is an accurate record of Summers&#039; presentation I think it is quite clear what the man was saying.  I will let you all decide for yourselves, but for me no amount of backpeddling after the fact will change my opinion.  

http://www.president.harvard.edu/speeches/2005/nber.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is an accurate record of Summers&#8217; presentation I think it is quite clear what the man was saying.  I will let you all decide for yourselves, but for me no amount of backpeddling after the fact will change my opinion.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.president.harvard.edu/speeches/2005/nber.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.president.harvard.e...../nber.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/11/06/summers-is-over-the-washington-post-reports-on-the-new-agendas-anti-summers-position/comment-page-1/#comment-2559</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1425#comment-2559</guid>
		<description>Larry Summers said some controversial statements to provoke discussion.  Not because he actually believed them.  He has repeatedly appoligised for his statements and acknowledged his mistake.  Women who know the man say he is not sexist and actively promotes the education of women.  In 1992 he was the chief economist at the world bank and told foreign leaders that educating women is key to economic development.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sheryl-sandberg/what-larry-summers-has-do_b_142126.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry Summers said some controversial statements to provoke discussion.  Not because he actually believed them.  He has repeatedly appoligised for his statements and acknowledged his mistake.  Women who know the man say he is not sexist and actively promotes the education of women.  In 1992 he was the chief economist at the world bank and told foreign leaders that educating women is key to economic development.<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sheryl-sandberg/what-larry-summers-has-do_b_142126.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....42126.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/11/06/summers-is-over-the-washington-post-reports-on-the-new-agendas-anti-summers-position/comment-page-1/#comment-2446</link>
		<dc:creator>The New Agenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1425#comment-2446</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This ‘innate differences’ thing happened in 2005, but it is neo-lib nonsense — like saying Gore claimed he invented the internet, or Ferroro and the Clintons made ‘racially insensitive’ remarks, or Palin ‘thought Africa was a country.’&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It is most certainly not  &quot;neo-lib nonsense.&quot;  One of the founders of The New Agenda, Nancy Hopkins, was in attendance at the meeting where Summers made his ridiculous remarks.  In fact, she was so incensed that she got up and walked out.  

Summers has no business in any position of responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This ‘innate differences’ thing happened in 2005, but it is neo-lib nonsense — like saying Gore claimed he invented the internet, or Ferroro and the Clintons made ‘racially insensitive’ remarks, or Palin ‘thought Africa was a country.’</p></blockquote>
<p>It is most certainly not  &#8220;neo-lib nonsense.&#8221;  One of the founders of The New Agenda, Nancy Hopkins, was in attendance at the meeting where Summers made his ridiculous remarks.  In fact, she was so incensed that she got up and walked out.  </p>
<p>Summers has no business in any position of responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turndownobama</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/11/06/summers-is-over-the-washington-post-reports-on-the-new-agendas-anti-summers-position/comment-page-1/#comment-2445</link>
		<dc:creator>turndownobama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1425#comment-2445</guid>
		<description>I am a PUMA because I supported HIllary. I supported Hillary because she and Bill did a good job in the 90s. They appointed Summers and he was a big part of their economic success.

Before attacking the CLINTON&#039;s Treasury appointee who cleaned up after Bush Sr and did a good job with bailouts -- PLEASE look into this more carefully. Please let&#039;s attack some bot candidate instead.

Summers was up for confirmation hearings several times as he worked his way up through the Treasury after Clinton appointed him in 1993 (as Under Secretary iirc). The 1991 memo was an issue then but Bill wasn&#039;t worried (imo the memo was satire).

Accusations of &#039;abrasive personality&#039; didn&#039;t keep Bill from promoting Summers throughout the Clinton administration.

This &#039;innate differences&#039; thing happened in 2005, but it is neo-lib nonsense -- like saying Gore claimed he invented the internet, or Ferroro and the Clintons made &#039;racially insensitive&#039; remarks, or Palin &#039;thought Africa was a country.&#039;

Restoring the Clinton cabinet is a GOOD thing for the country. Let&#039;s not give the bots an excuse to sabotage it.

For my own PUMA credentials -- see my old blog begun last fall, 1950democrat.livejournal.com; and my later web pages ironmyvote.com begun early 2008; turndownobama.com begun May 2008; PumaResponders.com begun this summer. I&#039;ve been posting for months on Hillaryis44.org and from their beginnings on clintondems.com, bitterpoliticz, pumapac.org, etc, as 1950democrat and later as turndownobama-com.

I&#039;ve started a diary at clintondems.com supporting Summers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a PUMA because I supported HIllary. I supported Hillary because she and Bill did a good job in the 90s. They appointed Summers and he was a big part of their economic success.</p>
<p>Before attacking the CLINTON&#8217;s Treasury appointee who cleaned up after Bush Sr and did a good job with bailouts &#8212; PLEASE look into this more carefully. Please let&#8217;s attack some bot candidate instead.</p>
<p>Summers was up for confirmation hearings several times as he worked his way up through the Treasury after Clinton appointed him in 1993 (as Under Secretary iirc). The 1991 memo was an issue then but Bill wasn&#8217;t worried (imo the memo was satire).</p>
<p>Accusations of &#8216;abrasive personality&#8217; didn&#8217;t keep Bill from promoting Summers throughout the Clinton administration.</p>
<p>This &#8216;innate differences&#8217; thing happened in 2005, but it is neo-lib nonsense &#8212; like saying Gore claimed he invented the internet, or Ferroro and the Clintons made &#8216;racially insensitive&#8217; remarks, or Palin &#8216;thought Africa was a country.&#8217;</p>
<p>Restoring the Clinton cabinet is a GOOD thing for the country. Let&#8217;s not give the bots an excuse to sabotage it.</p>
<p>For my own PUMA credentials &#8212; see my old blog begun last fall, 1950democrat.livejournal.com; and my later web pages ironmyvote.com begun early 2008; turndownobama.com begun May 2008; PumaResponders.com begun this summer. I&#8217;ve been posting for months on Hillaryis44.org and from their beginnings on clintondems.com, bitterpoliticz, pumapac.org, etc, as 1950democrat and later as turndownobama-com.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve started a diary at clintondems.com supporting Summers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Boston Globe on Summers and The New Agenda : The New Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/11/06/summers-is-over-the-washington-post-reports-on-the-new-agendas-anti-summers-position/comment-page-1/#comment-2280</link>
		<dc:creator>The Boston Globe on Summers and The New Agenda : The New Agenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 16:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1425#comment-2280</guid>
		<description>[...] identifies The New Agenda as an opponent of a Summers’ appointment (and see previous posts here and here). A women&#8217;s rights group called The New Agenda, established earlier this year by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] identifies The New Agenda as an opponent of a Summers’ appointment (and see previous posts here and here). A women&#8217;s rights group called The New Agenda, established earlier this year by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry O’s Larry Problem : The New Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/11/06/summers-is-over-the-washington-post-reports-on-the-new-agendas-anti-summers-position/comment-page-1/#comment-2277</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry O’s Larry Problem : The New Agenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1425#comment-2277</guid>
		<description>[...] article identifies The New Agenda as an opponent of a Summers’ appointment (also here, and here). A women&#8217;s rights group called The New Agenda, established earlier this year by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] article identifies The New Agenda as an opponent of a Summers’ appointment (also here, and here). A women&#8217;s rights group called The New Agenda, established earlier this year by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Siskind</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/11/06/summers-is-over-the-washington-post-reports-on-the-new-agendas-anti-summers-position/comment-page-1/#comment-2266</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Siskind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 05:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1425#comment-2266</guid>
		<description>He may be (over his head)!

Let&#039;s hope that our press in the Boston Globe and the Washington Post, plus a NYT articles will have them think it through.  I imagine Valerie Jarrett&#039;s inbox is rather full as well.

If Obama does NOT pick Summers, we will have to give him credit as such.  We need to reinforce positive as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He may be (over his head)!</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope that our press in the Boston Globe and the Washington Post, plus a NYT articles will have them think it through.  I imagine Valerie Jarrett&#8217;s inbox is rather full as well.</p>
<p>If Obama does NOT pick Summers, we will have to give him credit as such.  We need to reinforce positive as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnnieCollier</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/11/06/summers-is-over-the-washington-post-reports-on-the-new-agendas-anti-summers-position/comment-page-1/#comment-2263</link>
		<dc:creator>AnnieCollier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 04:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1425#comment-2263</guid>
		<description>&quot;I can’t help thinking that if obama cared about women in the first place, he wouldn’t have chosen this particular economist - especially at this particular time.&quot;

I wonder if Obama is even aware that there&#039;s an issue with Summers and his comments regarding women.  It&#039;s certainly not at the top of his agenda and I agree that he doesn&#039;t care.  The man is so obviously arrogant.  With that attitude for all the world to see, his fall will be a brutal one...as they usually are.  Nixon comes to mind.  And, Bill too.  Anything not addressed in personal shortcomings is just sitting there waiting to reveal itself.

He seems over his head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I can’t help thinking that if obama cared about women in the first place, he wouldn’t have chosen this particular economist &#8211; especially at this particular time.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wonder if Obama is even aware that there&#8217;s an issue with Summers and his comments regarding women.  It&#8217;s certainly not at the top of his agenda and I agree that he doesn&#8217;t care.  The man is so obviously arrogant.  With that attitude for all the world to see, his fall will be a brutal one&#8230;as they usually are.  Nixon comes to mind.  And, Bill too.  Anything not addressed in personal shortcomings is just sitting there waiting to reveal itself.</p>
<p>He seems over his head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zee</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/11/06/summers-is-over-the-washington-post-reports-on-the-new-agendas-anti-summers-position/comment-page-1/#comment-2257</link>
		<dc:creator>Zee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 23:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1425#comment-2257</guid>
		<description>Oh, and notice the absence of NOW from the article.  No statement from our supposed champions of women?  Well, step aside NOW, we have a new spokesgroup.  The New Agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and notice the absence of NOW from the article.  No statement from our supposed champions of women?  Well, step aside NOW, we have a new spokesgroup.  The New Agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

