<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amy Siskind on Fox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/10/30/amy-siskind-on-fox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/10/30/amy-siskind-on-fox/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: win</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/10/30/amy-siskind-on-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator>win</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1350#comment-2799</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I am late to post on this as well, but I also felt that this election cycle was disheartening to women.  We often hear from politicians how women are not treated fairly in the work place or at home by others.  Yet this election cycle worse then any work place or many families do.  Women lost much of the respectibility they had gained in politics as major female candidates in both parties were ridiculed for nothing much beyond being a women and acting like one.  If Palin or Clinton did not act &quot;female&quot; enough they were ridiculed, if they did they were ridiculed.  The message came across clear, women do not belong in politics, its a &quot;mans&quot; world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I am late to post on this as well, but I also felt that this election cycle was disheartening to women.  We often hear from politicians how women are not treated fairly in the work place or at home by others.  Yet this election cycle worse then any work place or many families do.  Women lost much of the respectibility they had gained in politics as major female candidates in both parties were ridiculed for nothing much beyond being a women and acting like one.  If Palin or Clinton did not act &#8220;female&#8221; enough they were ridiculed, if they did they were ridiculed.  The message came across clear, women do not belong in politics, its a &#8220;mans&#8221; world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbl</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/10/30/amy-siskind-on-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2258</link>
		<dc:creator>gbl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 00:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1350#comment-2258</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m late to the party, but I&#039;d like to point out that in my experience, political candidates and those in office don&#039;t read newspapers. They read copious clippings and summaries prepared by their staff. 

I&#039;ve also been a reporter and I know firsthand what Couric was doing. So of course, does Brad, but he&#039;s being paid to spin it and find stuff on Google. What an intellect. Meh. 

Long ago, I said no more. It&#039;s a life of poverty and leisure. ;)  (Oh no did I wink?). But I don&#039;t have to work with the Brads anymore.  Loathsome little turds devoid of ethics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m late to the party, but I&#8217;d like to point out that in my experience, political candidates and those in office don&#8217;t read newspapers. They read copious clippings and summaries prepared by their staff. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also been a reporter and I know firsthand what Couric was doing. So of course, does Brad, but he&#8217;s being paid to spin it and find stuff on Google. What an intellect. Meh. </p>
<p>Long ago, I said no more. It&#8217;s a life of poverty and leisure. <img src='http://www.thenewagenda.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   (Oh no did I wink?). But I don&#8217;t have to work with the Brads anymore.  Loathsome little turds devoid of ethics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/10/30/amy-siskind-on-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2119</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1350#comment-2119</guid>
		<description>I, too, feel sad and frustrated that somehow the treatment of Sarah Palin has just been swept under the rug. Where is the outrage? I am at a complete loss. I feel like I&#039;m in a glass room that is surrounded on the outside by men and women. I&#039;m banging on the glass wall, yelling, trying to get their attention about this critical issue, but they don&#039;t notice...they go about their business as though nothing is amiss. Nobody seems to care.

I have attempted to talk with a couple girlfriends about my frustration and have been met with blank stares and comments like, &quot;oh, there isn&#039;t any sexism occurring in the campaign.&quot;...then I later find out they were Obama supporters (and presumably blinded by their more liberal views to see it).

As a last resort, I think &quot;well, surely someone at NOW or another prominent feminist will sound the alarm&quot; but then I am painfully reminded of how many of them have been exposed as frauds. They profess to fight for women&#039;s rights, calling out anyone who dares to incite sexism into issues, or target a woman for her beliefs. Oh, they do...just as long as you are a liberal woman. If you&#039;re not a liberal (pro-choice) woman, forget about it. To me, that makes them frauds. An organization that professes to be about women&#039;s equality should be non-partisan, taking their political party hats off to adequately address the issue.

How many steps back has the feminist movement taken as a result of the incidents in this campaign? It&#039;s been great to find this site and know that I am not alone in my frustration. Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to vent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, feel sad and frustrated that somehow the treatment of Sarah Palin has just been swept under the rug. Where is the outrage? I am at a complete loss. I feel like I&#8217;m in a glass room that is surrounded on the outside by men and women. I&#8217;m banging on the glass wall, yelling, trying to get their attention about this critical issue, but they don&#8217;t notice&#8230;they go about their business as though nothing is amiss. Nobody seems to care.</p>
<p>I have attempted to talk with a couple girlfriends about my frustration and have been met with blank stares and comments like, &#8220;oh, there isn&#8217;t any sexism occurring in the campaign.&#8221;&#8230;then I later find out they were Obama supporters (and presumably blinded by their more liberal views to see it).</p>
<p>As a last resort, I think &#8220;well, surely someone at NOW or another prominent feminist will sound the alarm&#8221; but then I am painfully reminded of how many of them have been exposed as frauds. They profess to fight for women&#8217;s rights, calling out anyone who dares to incite sexism into issues, or target a woman for her beliefs. Oh, they do&#8230;just as long as you are a liberal woman. If you&#8217;re not a liberal (pro-choice) woman, forget about it. To me, that makes them frauds. An organization that professes to be about women&#8217;s equality should be non-partisan, taking their political party hats off to adequately address the issue.</p>
<p>How many steps back has the feminist movement taken as a result of the incidents in this campaign? It&#8217;s been great to find this site and know that I am not alone in my frustration. Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to vent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/10/30/amy-siskind-on-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2057</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1350#comment-2057</guid>
		<description>I feel sad that women were treated like second-class citizens in this election and it went unnoticed by so many women!  It does not even make sense to me.  If any other underrepresented group were treated the way women were, there would be riots and chaos, and rightfully so.  I hope this group can make a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel sad that women were treated like second-class citizens in this election and it went unnoticed by so many women!  It does not even make sense to me.  If any other underrepresented group were treated the way women were, there would be riots and chaos, and rightfully so.  I hope this group can make a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reintroducing THE NEW AGENDA : The New Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/10/30/amy-siskind-on-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-2045</link>
		<dc:creator>Reintroducing THE NEW AGENDA : The New Agenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1350#comment-2045</guid>
		<description>[...] These notions allowed The New Agenda to be the only women’s rights group to speak out on the misogyny faced by Governor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] These notions allowed The New Agenda to be the only women’s rights group to speak out on the misogyny faced by Governor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lightacandle</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/10/30/amy-siskind-on-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-1911</link>
		<dc:creator>lightacandle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 03:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1350#comment-1911</guid>
		<description>&quot;SHADOW? That’s idea whose time has come.&quot;

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks.  What I am planning to do is end every e-mail with this signature:

“SHADOW” now . . . and “SHADOW” forever!

I hope to be able to start something that will at least cause conversation and, eventually, cause a change in people’s ways of thinking and talking about women.

Men are absolutely encouraged to join in this effort. After all, I am sure they don’t want their mothers, wives, daughters, sisters, aunts, grandmothers and granddaughters to be treated disrespectfully either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;SHADOW? That’s idea whose time has come.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Thanks.  What I am planning to do is end every e-mail with this signature:</p>
<p>“SHADOW” now . . . and “SHADOW” forever!</p>
<p>I hope to be able to start something that will at least cause conversation and, eventually, cause a change in people’s ways of thinking and talking about women.</p>
<p>Men are absolutely encouraged to join in this effort. After all, I am sure they don’t want their mothers, wives, daughters, sisters, aunts, grandmothers and granddaughters to be treated disrespectfully either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monarch</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/10/30/amy-siskind-on-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-1910</link>
		<dc:creator>Monarch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 03:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1350#comment-1910</guid>
		<description>SHADOW?  That&#039;s idea whose time has come.

As far as Barack&#039;s &quot;nuance&quot;, make me laugh.  He&#039;s been pretty blatant  and very, very one-sided about voter fraud, contempt for women and for those of us who work for a living.  The main problem with Governor Palin is that she exposes Barack for the sleazy politician he is.  No change there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SHADOW?  That&#8217;s idea whose time has come.</p>
<p>As far as Barack&#8217;s &#8220;nuance&#8221;, make me laugh.  He&#8217;s been pretty blatant  and very, very one-sided about voter fraud, contempt for women and for those of us who work for a living.  The main problem with Governor Palin is that she exposes Barack for the sleazy politician he is.  No change there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lightacandle</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/10/30/amy-siskind-on-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-1909</link>
		<dc:creator>lightacandle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 02:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1350#comment-1909</guid>
		<description>&quot;Joe Biden has been better for women in his career, and will be better in the white house.&quot;
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I wouldn&#039;t get too carried away with Joe Biden&#039;s concern for women. He is probably the single person most responsible for Clarence Thomas being on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Joe Biden was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee when the senate was considering the appointment of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court.

Biden was nasty to Anita Hill, who was the principal witness against Clarence Thomas. He also refused to allow a whole array of women, who were waiting in an adjacent room at the senate, to testify even though they had all come to tell their own stories of Clarence Thomas&#039;s sexual harassment of them.

But Joe Biden would not allow it.

Clarence Thomas sits on the United States Supreme Court, today, largely because of Joe Biden&#039;s actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Joe Biden has been better for women in his career, and will be better in the white house.&#8221;<br />
- &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; -</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t get too carried away with Joe Biden&#8217;s concern for women. He is probably the single person most responsible for Clarence Thomas being on the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>
<p>Joe Biden was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee when the senate was considering the appointment of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>Biden was nasty to Anita Hill, who was the principal witness against Clarence Thomas. He also refused to allow a whole array of women, who were waiting in an adjacent room at the senate, to testify even though they had all come to tell their own stories of Clarence Thomas&#8217;s sexual harassment of them.</p>
<p>But Joe Biden would not allow it.</p>
<p>Clarence Thomas sits on the United States Supreme Court, today, largely because of Joe Biden&#8217;s actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lightacandle</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/10/30/amy-siskind-on-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-1908</link>
		<dc:creator>lightacandle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1350#comment-1908</guid>
		<description>I have &quot;had&quot; it and am starting a new effort -- for now, I am calling it

     &quot;Stop Humiliation And Disparagement Of Women&quot;


The short version is &quot;SHADOW&quot;

I don&#039;t care how others may feel about Hillary Clinton or Sarah Palin, this campaign season has turned my stomach and saddened my soul. Seemingly &quot;nice&quot; people have mocked both Clinton and Palin in the most disgusting and evidence-free ways -- and for reasons unrelated to their effectiveness as public officials.

As Craig Crawford noted earlier in the campaign season, with regard to both President Clinton and Senator Clinton, &quot;I really think the evidence-free bias against the Clintons in the media borders on mental illness.&quot;

Crawford was right then, and his words apply even now to Senator Hillary Clinton and Gov. Sarah Palin.

Both of these women hold high and important political offices, yet they are treated daily to degrading and humiliating slurs and insults related to the fact they are women.

Just very recently, some man in West Hollywood got his jollies from hanging an effigy of Sarah Palin by a noose. Many people (both men and women) thought it was amusing and, so, the effigy remained in place for a week until the West Hollywood mayor persuaded the man to take it down.

On the other hand, an effigy of Barack Obama hung by a noose resulted in the arrest of the two young men who had put it up.

It was correct to arrest the men who put up the Obama effigy, but WHY was the hanging Sarah Palin considered humorous?

As a woman, I will tell you I was NOT amused -- I was horrified and enraged.

As the Nazis learned and honed to perfection: first you humiliate some group, then you blame them for society&#039;s woes, and then you can do anything you please to them -- even beat or kill them -- and no one will come to their aid.

Well, other disparaged groups have fought back and I am bewildered that no women (or very few women) have fought back against the organized and free-lance disparagement of Senator Clinton and Gov. Palin.

Well, every movement starts with a first step, and this will be my first step to 

      &quot;Stop Humiliation And Disparagement Of Women&quot;


&quot;SHADOW&quot; now . . . and &quot;SHADOW&quot; forever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have &#8220;had&#8221; it and am starting a new effort &#8212; for now, I am calling it</p>
<p>     &#8220;Stop Humiliation And Disparagement Of Women&#8221;</p>
<p>The short version is &#8220;SHADOW&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care how others may feel about Hillary Clinton or Sarah Palin, this campaign season has turned my stomach and saddened my soul. Seemingly &#8220;nice&#8221; people have mocked both Clinton and Palin in the most disgusting and evidence-free ways &#8212; and for reasons unrelated to their effectiveness as public officials.</p>
<p>As Craig Crawford noted earlier in the campaign season, with regard to both President Clinton and Senator Clinton, &#8220;I really think the evidence-free bias against the Clintons in the media borders on mental illness.&#8221;</p>
<p>Crawford was right then, and his words apply even now to Senator Hillary Clinton and Gov. Sarah Palin.</p>
<p>Both of these women hold high and important political offices, yet they are treated daily to degrading and humiliating slurs and insults related to the fact they are women.</p>
<p>Just very recently, some man in West Hollywood got his jollies from hanging an effigy of Sarah Palin by a noose. Many people (both men and women) thought it was amusing and, so, the effigy remained in place for a week until the West Hollywood mayor persuaded the man to take it down.</p>
<p>On the other hand, an effigy of Barack Obama hung by a noose resulted in the arrest of the two young men who had put it up.</p>
<p>It was correct to arrest the men who put up the Obama effigy, but WHY was the hanging Sarah Palin considered humorous?</p>
<p>As a woman, I will tell you I was NOT amused &#8212; I was horrified and enraged.</p>
<p>As the Nazis learned and honed to perfection: first you humiliate some group, then you blame them for society&#8217;s woes, and then you can do anything you please to them &#8212; even beat or kill them &#8212; and no one will come to their aid.</p>
<p>Well, other disparaged groups have fought back and I am bewildered that no women (or very few women) have fought back against the organized and free-lance disparagement of Senator Clinton and Gov. Palin.</p>
<p>Well, every movement starts with a first step, and this will be my first step to </p>
<p>      &#8220;Stop Humiliation And Disparagement Of Women&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;SHADOW&#8221; now . . . and &#8220;SHADOW&#8221; forever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juliette</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/10/30/amy-siskind-on-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-1907</link>
		<dc:creator>Juliette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=1350#comment-1907</guid>
		<description>Delta 
Please explain Barak Obama&#039;s intellectual curiosity. In all his time as chairman of the foreign relations subcommitte on Europe and NATO he has not held a single meeting. This committe is key to affecting our policy in the war in Afghanistan. Obama has shown very little curiosity in Iraq,as he never bothered to visit the nation all during 2005, 06and,07. Its seems that Obama&#039;s curiosity lies in the craft of steeling elections, the teachings of Malcohn X , Bill Ayers, Franklin Marshal, and James Cone. Sarah Palin is at least smart enough to know that the fact that Obama is so beloved by ever person who would like to destroy America, has great significance. These terrorists, dictators and preachers of hate seem to know Barak Obama better than most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delta<br />
Please explain Barak Obama&#8217;s intellectual curiosity. In all his time as chairman of the foreign relations subcommitte on Europe and NATO he has not held a single meeting. This committe is key to affecting our policy in the war in Afghanistan. Obama has shown very little curiosity in Iraq,as he never bothered to visit the nation all during 2005, 06and,07. Its seems that Obama&#8217;s curiosity lies in the craft of steeling elections, the teachings of Malcohn X , Bill Ayers, Franklin Marshal, and James Cone. Sarah Palin is at least smart enough to know that the fact that Obama is so beloved by ever person who would like to destroy America, has great significance. These terrorists, dictators and preachers of hate seem to know Barak Obama better than most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

