<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Agenda responds to NOW endorsement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/20/the-new-agenda-responds-to-now-endorsement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/20/the-new-agenda-responds-to-now-endorsement/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/20/the-new-agenda-responds-to-now-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 04:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=518#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>Those of you who are of the opinion we should be supporting Sen. Obama&#039;s ticket have not paid very close attention to how Sen. Clinton was treated.  Have you watched Gigi Gaston&#039;s Documentary http://wewillnotbesilenced2008.com/video/index.htm 
  It goes into extensive detail as to HOW OBAMA cheated his way into the Dem. Nomination.  How he stole that nomination from a WOMAN ... a chance for the very first woman we&#039;ve had to become President of the United States.  
  I don&#039;t want to hear any one of you complain about Woman&#039;s rights if you can&#039;t even cry foul to the crime that took place to a WOMAN.  Grow up.  Look at what Obama and his TEAM (as they call themselves) have done and what they will do to our country.  Have you not seen his comments towards WOMEN?  That&#039;s OK sweetie, do you know his record on paying his female staff?   ... Way below what the men are paid .... Get a grip ladies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you who are of the opinion we should be supporting Sen. Obama&#8217;s ticket have not paid very close attention to how Sen. Clinton was treated.  Have you watched Gigi Gaston&#8217;s Documentary <a href="http://wewillnotbesilenced2008.com/video/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://wewillnotbesilenced2008.com/video/index.htm</a><br />
  It goes into extensive detail as to HOW OBAMA cheated his way into the Dem. Nomination.  How he stole that nomination from a WOMAN &#8230; a chance for the very first woman we&#8217;ve had to become President of the United States.<br />
  I don&#8217;t want to hear any one of you complain about Woman&#8217;s rights if you can&#8217;t even cry foul to the crime that took place to a WOMAN.  Grow up.  Look at what Obama and his TEAM (as they call themselves) have done and what they will do to our country.  Have you not seen his comments towards WOMEN?  That&#8217;s OK sweetie, do you know his record on paying his female staff?   &#8230; Way below what the men are paid &#8230;. Get a grip ladies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BW</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/20/the-new-agenda-responds-to-now-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>BW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=518#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>Keiko said: “Do you really wish to foster discussion on all sides?”

Keiko - Respectfully, I personally don&#039;t want to &quot;foster discussion&quot; about whether it is ok to subjugate women, engage in misogyny, demean women, pay them less, threaten them with their  personal physical, professional and spiritual rights and choices and all the other topics that women have been dealing with for thousands of years.

WHY ON EARTH are these issues STILL issues? What is it about people in general, men, other women, cultures, religions and political leanings that give them the right to continually force women into a subservient position?

It is time to &quot;just say no&quot; and make it stick. Enough is enough.

I would hope TNA will keep this as the forward thought within this organization and maintain the pressure in the place this practice is underscored the most: In the Media.

The fact that there is a need for TNA simply underscores just how far we have yet to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keiko said: “Do you really wish to foster discussion on all sides?”</p>
<p>Keiko &#8211; Respectfully, I personally don&#8217;t want to &#8220;foster discussion&#8221; about whether it is ok to subjugate women, engage in misogyny, demean women, pay them less, threaten them with their  personal physical, professional and spiritual rights and choices and all the other topics that women have been dealing with for thousands of years.</p>
<p>WHY ON EARTH are these issues STILL issues? What is it about people in general, men, other women, cultures, religions and political leanings that give them the right to continually force women into a subservient position?</p>
<p>It is time to &#8220;just say no&#8221; and make it stick. Enough is enough.</p>
<p>I would hope TNA will keep this as the forward thought within this organization and maintain the pressure in the place this practice is underscored the most: In the Media.</p>
<p>The fact that there is a need for TNA simply underscores just how far we have yet to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Msakel</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/20/the-new-agenda-responds-to-now-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Msakel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 00:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=518#comment-962</guid>
		<description>I applaud The New Agenda and bravo to Dr. Violet Socks for her post.  It is unfathomable that women continue to believe that any one party has our agenda on its Agenda!

No one party can afford to ignore women&#039;s voices.  The entrenched misogyny in all political parties is a fact that needs to be addressed by strong female voices, irrespective of their party affiliation.  The media misogynist frat-boys, with a tremendous assisst from the Obama campaign, and from Sen. Obama&#039;s own camouflaged misogyny (&quot;Obama Gives Finger to Hillary&quot; mega-hit) pushed a smugly anorexic resume to the top of the interviews file!  The systemic sexism of the media has blurred its vision to the point where women candidates are degraded, demoted, demeaned and diminished with the blessings of women whose vision has been blurred by Obamyopia.  Unfortunately, this election offers no dilemmatic angst. The choice between Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumbo means that, once again, women&#039;s voices are silenced by a deeply misogynist media and a   &quot;Democratic &quot; campaign that has consistently and dangerously refused to respect and acknowledge the historic candidacy of Sen. Hillary Clinton.  Come November, the millions of cracks on the ceiling that obamyopics have tried to plaster over will be shattered in an unprecedented way.  Periodically, then, Sen. Obama will feel down  as result, and launch attacks against the women whom he thought he&#039;d &quot;win over easy&quot;--knowing that he&#039;ll just have to &quot;get over it&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I applaud The New Agenda and bravo to Dr. Violet Socks for her post.  It is unfathomable that women continue to believe that any one party has our agenda on its Agenda!</p>
<p>No one party can afford to ignore women&#8217;s voices.  The entrenched misogyny in all political parties is a fact that needs to be addressed by strong female voices, irrespective of their party affiliation.  The media misogynist frat-boys, with a tremendous assisst from the Obama campaign, and from Sen. Obama&#8217;s own camouflaged misogyny (&#8220;Obama Gives Finger to Hillary&#8221; mega-hit) pushed a smugly anorexic resume to the top of the interviews file!  The systemic sexism of the media has blurred its vision to the point where women candidates are degraded, demoted, demeaned and diminished with the blessings of women whose vision has been blurred by Obamyopia.  Unfortunately, this election offers no dilemmatic angst. The choice between Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumbo means that, once again, women&#8217;s voices are silenced by a deeply misogynist media and a   &#8220;Democratic &#8221; campaign that has consistently and dangerously refused to respect and acknowledge the historic candidacy of Sen. Hillary Clinton.  Come November, the millions of cracks on the ceiling that obamyopics have tried to plaster over will be shattered in an unprecedented way.  Periodically, then, Sen. Obama will feel down  as result, and launch attacks against the women whom he thought he&#8217;d &#8220;win over easy&#8221;&#8211;knowing that he&#8217;ll just have to &#8220;get over it&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. bobbi Anne white</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/20/the-new-agenda-responds-to-now-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. bobbi Anne white</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=518#comment-875</guid>
		<description>i have also taken links off my site that supported NOW. After what the dumbocratic party did to Hillary, how cold they suport Obama?

also it is a fact that senator mcCain&#039;s female staff are paid higher than Obama&#039;s staff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have also taken links off my site that supported NOW. After what the dumbocratic party did to Hillary, how cold they suport Obama?</p>
<p>also it is a fact that senator mcCain&#8217;s female staff are paid higher than Obama&#8217;s staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise (Brooklyn, New York)</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/20/the-new-agenda-responds-to-now-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise (Brooklyn, New York)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=518#comment-872</guid>
		<description>I agree. NOW has been too critical and down right condemning of women whose viewpoint differs from their own. Furthermore, I remember when NOW started off in the 70&#039;s and always thought that they had a hard line viewpoint, but there was no one else so many were forced, like it or not, to just settle.  

Now on hind sight, many of us realize that it was the wrong thing to do, but we thought we were doing the right thing in supporting of NOW since they are an organization of women.  However, time has shown that NOW has not reciprocated. 

I strongly believe that their lack of reciprocation and support for all women is one of the reasons we have not achieved that which we should have, could have and would have.

Moving on, I do not condemn NOW. I would like them to learn from past mistakes and I so welcome becoming a part of THE NEW AGENDA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. NOW has been too critical and down right condemning of women whose viewpoint differs from their own. Furthermore, I remember when NOW started off in the 70&#8242;s and always thought that they had a hard line viewpoint, but there was no one else so many were forced, like it or not, to just settle.  </p>
<p>Now on hind sight, many of us realize that it was the wrong thing to do, but we thought we were doing the right thing in supporting of NOW since they are an organization of women.  However, time has shown that NOW has not reciprocated. </p>
<p>I strongly believe that their lack of reciprocation and support for all women is one of the reasons we have not achieved that which we should have, could have and would have.</p>
<p>Moving on, I do not condemn NOW. I would like them to learn from past mistakes and I so welcome becoming a part of THE NEW AGENDA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indieyogini</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/20/the-new-agenda-responds-to-now-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>indieyogini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=518#comment-865</guid>
		<description>Feminism has lost its relevancy, thanks in part to moribund groups such as NOW and NARAL.  Feminism these days is stuck in academia and the fauxgressive left which has taken over the DNC.  As Zee points out it has become politically incorrect for feminists to speak out against the plight of women in Islamic societies.
  
I drifted away from NOW over the years and have let NARAL know that they won&#039;t be getting any further contributions from me due to their endorsement of Obama during a critical time in the primaries (when Hillary was embarrassing him by winning big states so the pressure mounted for her to drop out.)

I welcome The New Agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feminism has lost its relevancy, thanks in part to moribund groups such as NOW and NARAL.  Feminism these days is stuck in academia and the fauxgressive left which has taken over the DNC.  As Zee points out it has become politically incorrect for feminists to speak out against the plight of women in Islamic societies.</p>
<p>I drifted away from NOW over the years and have let NARAL know that they won&#8217;t be getting any further contributions from me due to their endorsement of Obama during a critical time in the primaries (when Hillary was embarrassing him by winning big states so the pressure mounted for her to drop out.)</p>
<p>I welcome The New Agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zee</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/20/the-new-agenda-responds-to-now-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>Zee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=518#comment-858</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wait, let me guess, the next step in your reasoning will be that if Israel has a female prime minister, the occupation of Palestine is less worrisome, and it might even be a good thing for Palestinian women.&quot;

Saralotta, the Palestinian women have a lot more problems than Israelis.  Living with a mindset that practices gender apartheid, for one.  Embracing a religion that teaches them if their sons martyr themselves they get glory in heaven...ie, children to rape for eternity.  All religions&#039; ideas of heavens are dubious, but I side with the Dutch cartoonist who joked &quot;Stop!  Heaven&#039;s running out of virgins!&quot;  The problems of Islamic women will continue as long as we pretend to &quot;respect&quot; a religion that treats them as chattel both on earth and in &quot;heaven.&quot;

But in the Whole Foods Nation is it heresy for me to say so, while it&#039;s a-ok to pick Sarah Palin&#039;s bones clear over her religious beliefs, which she has shown to keep separate from her governing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wait, let me guess, the next step in your reasoning will be that if Israel has a female prime minister, the occupation of Palestine is less worrisome, and it might even be a good thing for Palestinian women.&#8221;</p>
<p>Saralotta, the Palestinian women have a lot more problems than Israelis.  Living with a mindset that practices gender apartheid, for one.  Embracing a religion that teaches them if their sons martyr themselves they get glory in heaven&#8230;ie, children to rape for eternity.  All religions&#8217; ideas of heavens are dubious, but I side with the Dutch cartoonist who joked &#8220;Stop!  Heaven&#8217;s running out of virgins!&#8221;  The problems of Islamic women will continue as long as we pretend to &#8220;respect&#8221; a religion that treats them as chattel both on earth and in &#8220;heaven.&#8221;</p>
<p>But in the Whole Foods Nation is it heresy for me to say so, while it&#8217;s a-ok to pick Sarah Palin&#8217;s bones clear over her religious beliefs, which she has shown to keep separate from her governing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcia Pappas</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/20/the-new-agenda-responds-to-now-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcia Pappas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=518#comment-752</guid>
		<description>Just to let you know, I have dissented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to let you know, I have dissented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juliette Stango</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/20/the-new-agenda-responds-to-now-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Juliette Stango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=518#comment-743</guid>
		<description>I unsubscribed to NOW and attached a stong letter in opposition to their endorcement of Barak Obama. My problem with their endorsement is not that it was an all male ticket, if the ticket were Biden/Kucinich that would be fine. Joe Biden is responsible for the violence against women act. But Barak Obama is no friend to women. He mocked Hillary Clinton in a very sexist manor and never tried to stop the outragous sexism directed at her through the media, the DNC, his campaign and his friends, Rev. Wright and Rev. Pfleger. Barak Obama joyfully benefited from the most vulgar kind of sexism intended to destroy his political opponant and this is the second time he through a woman under the bus to get elected (Alice Palmer) who tryed to run against him for the IL state Senate;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I unsubscribed to NOW and attached a stong letter in opposition to their endorcement of Barak Obama. My problem with their endorsement is not that it was an all male ticket, if the ticket were Biden/Kucinich that would be fine. Joe Biden is responsible for the violence against women act. But Barak Obama is no friend to women. He mocked Hillary Clinton in a very sexist manor and never tried to stop the outragous sexism directed at her through the media, the DNC, his campaign and his friends, Rev. Wright and Rev. Pfleger. Barak Obama joyfully benefited from the most vulgar kind of sexism intended to destroy his political opponant and this is the second time he through a woman under the bus to get elected (Alice Palmer) who tryed to run against him for the IL state Senate;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn C</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/20/the-new-agenda-responds-to-now-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=518#comment-686</guid>
		<description>Just a note: The Washington Post story currently has 816 comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note: The Washington Post story currently has 816 comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

