<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin on feminist issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/15/sarah-palin-on-feminist-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/15/sarah-palin-on-feminist-issues/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/15/sarah-palin-on-feminist-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-1798</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=375#comment-1798</guid>
		<description>i notice that you didn&#039;t say how Palin refused to idinitfy herself as a feminist, backing away from a statement she had made to Katie Couric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i notice that you didn&#8217;t say how Palin refused to idinitfy herself as a feminist, backing away from a statement she had made to Katie Couric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/15/sarah-palin-on-feminist-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=375#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>Greetings!
Thank you soooo much for standing up for Sarah Palin. I  have 3 daughters &amp; we are all horrified at how the press has been treating her. It is so disrespectful &amp; should be considered insulting to all, but especially women.  This political bigotry has gotten totally out of hand &amp; it needs to stop.    I&#039;m so glad I&#039;ve found this site. .  It was a breath of fresh air to read something positive written about about Sarah Palin. She is a truly remarkable woman.
Sincerely grateful, 
~Christine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings!<br />
Thank you soooo much for standing up for Sarah Palin. I  have 3 daughters &amp; we are all horrified at how the press has been treating her. It is so disrespectful &amp; should be considered insulting to all, but especially women.  This political bigotry has gotten totally out of hand &amp; it needs to stop.    I&#8217;m so glad I&#8217;ve found this site. .  It was a breath of fresh air to read something positive written about about Sarah Palin. She is a truly remarkable woman.<br />
Sincerely grateful,<br />
~Christine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And therein lies the rub &#171; Blue Lyon</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/15/sarah-palin-on-feminist-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>And therein lies the rub &#171; Blue Lyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=375#comment-846</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeebus on a triscuit. Feminism is for Every Woman. Not just the ones you agree with 100%. From Dr. Violet Socks Sarah Palin calls herself a “pro-life feminist.” Basically, that’s feminism minus abortion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeebus on a triscuit. Feminism is for Every Woman. Not just the ones you agree with 100%. From Dr. Violet Socks Sarah Palin calls herself a “pro-life feminist.” Basically, that’s feminism minus abortion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goesh</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/15/sarah-palin-on-feminist-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>goesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=375#comment-732</guid>
		<description>I grew up in rural North Dakota where some of the best farm equipment operators were women, where some women managed the entire dairy herd and others could heave hay bales for hours on end and spend many hours in a day driving grain trucks. I knew one woman who could load trucks all day with sacks full of potatoes. That is quite a list of statements made by Governor Palin but I am not surprised or necessarily impressed over what has always been common sense to me personally and culturally experienced in my formative years. The vicious comments made about Sarah Palin  would be in paraticular extremely offensive to our women bearing arms in the 2 theatres of war we are currently in, Afghanistan and Iraq. That&#039;s right, women carrying rifles who have at times had to use them. As a man, I also find it very condescending that her mate is continually called a dude, first dude. A father of 5 with a steady work record in dangerous occupations is certainly not some dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I grew up in rural North Dakota where some of the best farm equipment operators were women, where some women managed the entire dairy herd and others could heave hay bales for hours on end and spend many hours in a day driving grain trucks. I knew one woman who could load trucks all day with sacks full of potatoes. That is quite a list of statements made by Governor Palin but I am not surprised or necessarily impressed over what has always been common sense to me personally and culturally experienced in my formative years. The vicious comments made about Sarah Palin  would be in paraticular extremely offensive to our women bearing arms in the 2 theatres of war we are currently in, Afghanistan and Iraq. That&#8217;s right, women carrying rifles who have at times had to use them. As a man, I also find it very condescending that her mate is continually called a dude, first dude. A father of 5 with a steady work record in dangerous occupations is certainly not some dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa F</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/15/sarah-palin-on-feminist-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=375#comment-729</guid>
		<description>Amy:

Thank you for the correction--and I would like to respectfully point out that a promise is not yet an advance. It is only a campaign promise...so far. And as far as The New Agenda is concerned, a white FEMALE anti-choice pro-gun pro-drilling candidate is better because.....she is a she? 

Look, I certainly get it about women in positions of leadership as advancing all women. (I am Hillary&#039;s age and in a male dominated profession, so I have had my own work cut out for me). And I support this as a general goal and as a good thing.

What I am concerned about is the idea of supporting ANY woman simply because of her gender. This is what McCain is counting on. 

He can promise all he wants, whatever he wants, but I agree with other posters here who say that just the presence of women is not enough. Its not just a numbers game, but one of substance, as you know. So I am looking at action. Given McCain&#039;s selection of Palin, a charismatic ideologue, who is to the right of Bush on almost every issue of national concern, to be a heartbeat away from running our country demonstrates bad judgement on his part. Just think of all of the other highly qualified, experienced Republican women he might have chosen. And there are lots out there.

So, instead, we get the current situation where either Palin is hiding or McCain is &quot;protecting&quot; her--both unacceptable from a feminist point of view. And the outcome being an insult to all of us who deserve to know who she is and what she really stands for. 

By the way, speaking of numbers, what do you make of the % of women delegates at the Republican Convention vs. the Democratic Convention...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy:</p>
<p>Thank you for the correction&#8211;and I would like to respectfully point out that a promise is not yet an advance. It is only a campaign promise&#8230;so far. And as far as The New Agenda is concerned, a white FEMALE anti-choice pro-gun pro-drilling candidate is better because&#8230;..she is a she? </p>
<p>Look, I certainly get it about women in positions of leadership as advancing all women. (I am Hillary&#8217;s age and in a male dominated profession, so I have had my own work cut out for me). And I support this as a general goal and as a good thing.</p>
<p>What I am concerned about is the idea of supporting ANY woman simply because of her gender. This is what McCain is counting on. </p>
<p>He can promise all he wants, whatever he wants, but I agree with other posters here who say that just the presence of women is not enough. Its not just a numbers game, but one of substance, as you know. So I am looking at action. Given McCain&#8217;s selection of Palin, a charismatic ideologue, who is to the right of Bush on almost every issue of national concern, to be a heartbeat away from running our country demonstrates bad judgement on his part. Just think of all of the other highly qualified, experienced Republican women he might have chosen. And there are lots out there.</p>
<p>So, instead, we get the current situation where either Palin is hiding or McCain is &#8220;protecting&#8221; her&#8211;both unacceptable from a feminist point of view. And the outcome being an insult to all of us who deserve to know who she is and what she really stands for. </p>
<p>By the way, speaking of numbers, what do you make of the % of women delegates at the Republican Convention vs. the Democratic Convention&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Siskind</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/15/sarah-palin-on-feminist-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Siskind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=375#comment-705</guid>
		<description>Lisa,

Respectfully disagree.  McCain already did something to advance our goals listed  here on our website - he promised us to have more women in his administration than any president in history.  Plus, he picked a woman for VP.  If not Palin, it would have been a white male pro-life candidate that likely would give some women a pause for that reason.  

Read the articles (and more to come) on our blog.  Having women in positions of power helps to advance women&#039;s issues.  There is a huge UN study that just came out last Thursday and specifically speak to this- Dawn C. will be writing about it shortly on our blog.

We are also having conversations and/or meetings with a surrogate for the Obama Campaign and the Green Party this week.

Women&#039;s rights for all candidates.  Now THAT&#039;s a worthy goal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa,</p>
<p>Respectfully disagree.  McCain already did something to advance our goals listed  here on our website &#8211; he promised us to have more women in his administration than any president in history.  Plus, he picked a woman for VP.  If not Palin, it would have been a white male pro-life candidate that likely would give some women a pause for that reason.  </p>
<p>Read the articles (and more to come) on our blog.  Having women in positions of power helps to advance women&#8217;s issues.  There is a huge UN study that just came out last Thursday and specifically speak to this- Dawn C. will be writing about it shortly on our blog.</p>
<p>We are also having conversations and/or meetings with a surrogate for the Obama Campaign and the Green Party this week.</p>
<p>Women&#8217;s rights for all candidates.  Now THAT&#8217;s a worthy goal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa F</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/15/sarah-palin-on-feminist-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=375#comment-704</guid>
		<description>OK, Palin&#039;s perspective on many issues directly affecting women seem benign. Though I profoundly disagree with her on other huge issues as pointed out by some of the other posters. However, in November we are voting for a ticket---and there are some serious questions women need to ask about the dynamic of this ticket in relation to our shared concerns.  

John McCain has cynically selected a woman running mate who he is systematically silencing by not allowing her press conferences or interviews. He is “handling” her in such a paternalistic way that I cannot believe that “non-partisan” The New Agenda is not aggressively addressing and tracking this behavior. His campaign is using the charge of “sexism” as a self-serving scare word to frighten off critics–thus co-opting the term to silence criticism rather than for its very serious true definition. If Palin is such a feminist, and so ready to be VP, why is she allowing herself to manipulated in this way. If she is such a qualified and capable candidate, why shield her from the press? If she is a strong, capable and independent woman, why is she hiding (especially given her comments about Hillary as quoted above)? Why is there such outrage when Gibson asks her tough questions that any Vice Presidential candidate should be able to answer directly and without made-up bravado? Such questioning is not sexist, it is due diligence by the press. Hillary never flinched when asked hard questions, and she never allowed the sexist comments and behaviors to ever derail her from appearing in public, meeting with the press or taking unscripted questions. Just because she is a working mom who thinks women should have equal rights is not enough for me to support Palin. In one of the two interviews she has given I saw only a charismatic ideologue who reminded me, like Cindy, of Bush.

In our current, admittedly broken, two-party system, anideological rejection of an Obama Adminstration (which is what we are voting for in November) is de facto support of a McCain Administration. Such an administration will do nothing, zip, zero to advance your agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Palin&#8217;s perspective on many issues directly affecting women seem benign. Though I profoundly disagree with her on other huge issues as pointed out by some of the other posters. However, in November we are voting for a ticket&#8212;and there are some serious questions women need to ask about the dynamic of this ticket in relation to our shared concerns.  </p>
<p>John McCain has cynically selected a woman running mate who he is systematically silencing by not allowing her press conferences or interviews. He is “handling” her in such a paternalistic way that I cannot believe that “non-partisan” The New Agenda is not aggressively addressing and tracking this behavior. His campaign is using the charge of “sexism” as a self-serving scare word to frighten off critics–thus co-opting the term to silence criticism rather than for its very serious true definition. If Palin is such a feminist, and so ready to be VP, why is she allowing herself to manipulated in this way. If she is such a qualified and capable candidate, why shield her from the press? If she is a strong, capable and independent woman, why is she hiding (especially given her comments about Hillary as quoted above)? Why is there such outrage when Gibson asks her tough questions that any Vice Presidential candidate should be able to answer directly and without made-up bravado? Such questioning is not sexist, it is due diligence by the press. Hillary never flinched when asked hard questions, and she never allowed the sexist comments and behaviors to ever derail her from appearing in public, meeting with the press or taking unscripted questions. Just because she is a working mom who thinks women should have equal rights is not enough for me to support Palin. In one of the two interviews she has given I saw only a charismatic ideologue who reminded me, like Cindy, of Bush.</p>
<p>In our current, admittedly broken, two-party system, anideological rejection of an Obama Adminstration (which is what we are voting for in November) is de facto support of a McCain Administration. Such an administration will do nothing, zip, zero to advance your agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maura</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/15/sarah-palin-on-feminist-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Maura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 22:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=375#comment-617</guid>
		<description>Why should women worry about men telling them they can&#039;t achieve things when there are so many women out there willing to do the hack job themselves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should women worry about men telling them they can&#8217;t achieve things when there are so many women out there willing to do the hack job themselves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ida</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/15/sarah-palin-on-feminist-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>ida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 05:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=375#comment-556</guid>
		<description>65% of married men think that Sarah can do the job of vice president because she is seen as a strong women that can do both and only 47% of married women think that she can do the job of vice president and the rest of the married mothers think that she can&#039;t juggle both because she has one kid going to war and one kid with down syndrome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>65% of married men think that Sarah can do the job of vice president because she is seen as a strong women that can do both and only 47% of married women think that she can do the job of vice president and the rest of the married mothers think that she can&#8217;t juggle both because she has one kid going to war and one kid with down syndrome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Violet Socks, Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/15/sarah-palin-on-feminist-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Violet Socks, Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 05:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=375#comment-554</guid>
		<description>This site is not going to be a signal station in the continuing smear campaign against Gov. Palin or any other woman candidate.

I&#039;m deleting comments that contain ungrounded accusations against Gov. Palin.  Please refrain from attempting to re-post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site is not going to be a signal station in the continuing smear campaign against Gov. Palin or any other woman candidate.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m deleting comments that contain ungrounded accusations against Gov. Palin.  Please refrain from attempting to re-post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

