<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “The Most Macho Speech of the Evening”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/04/%e2%80%9cthe-most-macho-speech-of-the-evening%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/04/%e2%80%9cthe-most-macho-speech-of-the-evening%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gem</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/04/%e2%80%9cthe-most-macho-speech-of-the-evening%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Gem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=64#comment-52</guid>
		<description>It was certainly an effective speech and her delivery was spot-on. But it was also hateful and nasty and for that reason, I&#039;m disappointed to see such high praise of it here. I thought it was meaner than Rudy&#039;s -- and that&#039;s saying a lot. Don&#039;t get me wrong. I object to the media&#039;s questioning of her capacity to be a mom and a VP, to the gratuitous camera shots of her legs and to the word &quot;shrill.&quot; But I in no way listen to her and feel like she&#039;s a neighbor or some friendly aunt. She&#039;s cut from the same vicious cloth as Rudy. I&#039;m not fooled by her folksy ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was certainly an effective speech and her delivery was spot-on. But it was also hateful and nasty and for that reason, I&#8217;m disappointed to see such high praise of it here. I thought it was meaner than Rudy&#8217;s &#8212; and that&#8217;s saying a lot. Don&#8217;t get me wrong. I object to the media&#8217;s questioning of her capacity to be a mom and a VP, to the gratuitous camera shots of her legs and to the word &#8220;shrill.&#8221; But I in no way listen to her and feel like she&#8217;s a neighbor or some friendly aunt. She&#8217;s cut from the same vicious cloth as Rudy. I&#8217;m not fooled by her folksy ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dulcy</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/04/%e2%80%9cthe-most-macho-speech-of-the-evening%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Dulcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=64#comment-34</guid>
		<description>My favorite headline re Gov. Palin&#039;s speech, &quot;She shoots!  She scores!&quot;
What a welcome sight, your NewAgenda blog!

PUMA purrs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite headline re Gov. Palin&#8217;s speech, &#8220;She shoots!  She scores!&#8221;<br />
What a welcome sight, your NewAgenda blog!</p>
<p>PUMA purrs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alix F</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/04/%e2%80%9cthe-most-macho-speech-of-the-evening%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Alix F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 06:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=64#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I thought her speech was fantastic.  Well written, well executed, overall an A+.  Frankly, it brought up a lot of points that I felt Hillary&#039;s campaign didn&#039;t go after tough enough (though for partisan reasons, it is obvious why she didn&#039;t.)  
I thought it was funny that MSNBC pundits kept saying that her speech was &quot;sarcastic&quot; as though that was a negative.  I like her sense of humour and I couldn&#039;t care less if she had Bush&#039;s speechwriter helping her on it.  
Maddow continues to disgust me with her focus on Palin &quot;pronouncing things phonetically.&quot;  I don&#039;t understand how they gave her a show after the hit job she did on women/Hillary during the primaries.  
A+ Palin.  I disagree on the pro-life stance as well as on others, but I relished in a woman standing up to the naysayers with sass and attitude.  Can&#039;t say I&#039;m voting for her, but she got my clapping tonight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought her speech was fantastic.  Well written, well executed, overall an A+.  Frankly, it brought up a lot of points that I felt Hillary&#8217;s campaign didn&#8217;t go after tough enough (though for partisan reasons, it is obvious why she didn&#8217;t.)<br />
I thought it was funny that MSNBC pundits kept saying that her speech was &#8220;sarcastic&#8221; as though that was a negative.  I like her sense of humour and I couldn&#8217;t care less if she had Bush&#8217;s speechwriter helping her on it.<br />
Maddow continues to disgust me with her focus on Palin &#8220;pronouncing things phonetically.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t understand how they gave her a show after the hit job she did on women/Hillary during the primaries.<br />
A+ Palin.  I disagree on the pro-life stance as well as on others, but I relished in a woman standing up to the naysayers with sass and attitude.  Can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m voting for her, but she got my clapping tonight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn C</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/04/%e2%80%9cthe-most-macho-speech-of-the-evening%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=64#comment-31</guid>
		<description>What I&#039;m loving: the talking heads on CNN doing a rebuttal of the speech are women. In fact, I saw a couple of women pundits &lt;i&gt;yelling&lt;/i&gt; at each other the other day on CNN, and they weren&#039;t talking about &quot;women&#039;s issues.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;m loving: the talking heads on CNN doing a rebuttal of the speech are women. In fact, I saw a couple of women pundits <i>yelling</i> at each other the other day on CNN, and they weren&#8217;t talking about &#8220;women&#8217;s issues.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Violet Socks, Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/04/%e2%80%9cthe-most-macho-speech-of-the-evening%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Violet Socks, Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=64#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Shrill?  Her speech was a knockout.  Everyone in the hall loved it, and everyone watching knew it was winner.  The talking heads afterwards seemed rather disappointed, but they had to admit that she passed &quot;with flying colors&quot; and that the McCain camp was no doubt high-fiving it over a huge success (this was on CBS -- Katie Couric, Jeff Greenfield, Bob Schaffer).

But I see the print media is weirdly unenthused.  Weirdly.  &quot;Palin mocks Obama&quot; says one headline.  &quot;Palin nominated&quot; says another.  Uh huh.

Look, I disagree with Palin on almost every policy position, but that  is one powerful woman and that was one powerful speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shrill?  Her speech was a knockout.  Everyone in the hall loved it, and everyone watching knew it was winner.  The talking heads afterwards seemed rather disappointed, but they had to admit that she passed &#8220;with flying colors&#8221; and that the McCain camp was no doubt high-fiving it over a huge success (this was on CBS &#8212; Katie Couric, Jeff Greenfield, Bob Schaffer).</p>
<p>But I see the print media is weirdly unenthused.  Weirdly.  &#8220;Palin mocks Obama&#8221; says one headline.  &#8220;Palin nominated&#8221; says another.  Uh huh.</p>
<p>Look, I disagree with Palin on almost every policy position, but that  is one powerful woman and that was one powerful speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn C</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewagenda.net/2008/09/04/%e2%80%9cthe-most-macho-speech-of-the-evening%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenewagenda.net/?p=64#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Someone called her speech &quot;shrill.&quot; Senator Reid? Begala and Brazile are defending the use of the word, others are criticizing it. Maybe we&#039;re going to see the referendum on sexism in media. Finally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone called her speech &#8220;shrill.&#8221; Senator Reid? Begala and Brazile are defending the use of the word, others are criticizing it. Maybe we&#8217;re going to see the referendum on sexism in media. Finally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

